VIP Announcement: After discussing it with my editor, this story will become a paid novel on September 25, this Sunday. Three chapters will be posted that day. This is a lighthearted story with a guaranteed happy ending. If you like my style, please add my author page to your favorites. I'll also post blurbs for two new stories sometime soon. I hope you'll support them when the time comes. Thank you so much. Love you all!
Qiao Jingran: I like you. Qiao Yifeng: You can't. Qiao Jingran: Why not? Qiao Yifeng: Because... we're both girls. Qiao Jingran: So what? Qiao Yifeng: Girls can't... Qiao Yifeng: Um... Mmm... Before Qiao Yifeng could finish speaking, Qiao Jingran kissed her to silence her and dragged her to bed. Why say so much? Let's do it first and talk later. After we've done it, you can't still deny that you like me, can you? Once we've done it, you can't refuse to take responsibility for me, can you?! I'm taking advantage of how much you love me to do whatever I want to you! Afterward. Qiao Yifeng: ...You... You... (Her breathing was still uneven, with a faint gasp.) Qiao Jingran: Now do you like me? Qiao Yifeng: We've already done it, so what's the point of talking about whether we like each other! Qiao Jingran: Waaaaah, we did it and you still won't admit you like me! You have to take responsibility for me! Qiao Yifeng: ... (Shouldn't I be the one who got eaten here?)
Little angels, look over here~ To put it simply: a goofy, clingy, mischievous, devoted puppy of a top x a tsundere bottom who pretends to be calm but spoils her rotten. PS: They are not sisters and are not blood related. This story is lighthearted, with a secondary couple. A sweet, doting romance. Enjoy!
Please add my author page to your favorites:
Previous story, now complete:
Theme:
Because many later readers do not understand the situation, let me explain why in many cases where they feel differently, they say this book is plagiarized.
The story begins when the author of the original article sent out the palette of the previous dozen chapters, pointing out that this article may have been plagiarized, and made it clear that as long as the author of this article gives a reasonable explanation for the content of the palette, the original author will publicly apologize to the author of this article (either in the form of a lottery or forwarding).
If this is just a misunderstanding, it can actually be easily resolved. Just explain it clearly to the author of the original article, which can not only get rid of the plagiarism hat, but also bring some readers to this article due to the relationship between the original author himself. It's good to explain things clearly.
However, the author of this article did not give any meaningful response, not even a positive response! I just kept crying and said that I was going to be censored. I @a relatively authoritative big V and gave two links that could not be opened at all. Then after finishing this article, I disappeared. There was no news from a certain blog, and there was no news from Jinjiang.
So, why do this? Whether you feel aggrieved or angry, a clear explanation is the best solution, why not?
The most reasonable explanation is that this article is plagiarized, and the author simply took the money and ran away, so what if he lost his head? Anyway, as long as the article is not deleted or locked, the profit from this article will still belong to the author of this article. Don't say anything about being angry or dizzy. If you were really so courageous, I would have deleted and locked the article long ago.
I accidentally opened the comments and saw this article again. I was still angry when I saw the comments of the keyboard warrior. I just want to say to the author, come on, there is still a lot of room for improvement in writing. Come on~ This is an era of keyboard warriors. This is an era where people can criticize without knowing the truth. Don't take it too seriously. Whoever takes it seriously will lose. Being angry will also hurt your body. It hurts the liver~ Well, I can't be angry anymore, it's not worth it, so I ignore all keyboard warriors. You don't need to explain or explain, because there is no need at all~ If you are still writing articles~ I wish you better and better~ As I get older, I am always more verbose~ I won't write anymore, that's all~ Although I want to say a lot~
To be honest, I have never said such an exciting thing
Ahem, my moonstone is dedicated to the big one.
I hate those keyboards.
The only regret is that there is not enough money.
Like this book very much. Well, I really don't know what to say. Anyway, I just don't like those guys who grind dungeons, and I want to brush them back.
Alas~ I really want to say something but I don't know what to say, but I still want to say something! I'm just a reader who has read two books and give my personal opinion! I really doubt whether the word "righteous indignation" has a positive or derogatory meaning. I have read both articles. If I look at the details, there are many, many differences in the previous chapters. They are all rebirth articles, they are all modern articles, they are all ethics articles. If you write articles under the premise that each of them has already determined the direction of writing, it is very likely that there will be a crash. Isn't this excusable? Most TV dramas will indicate that "any similarities are purely coincidental." Since this sentence exists, there must be a reason for its existence. Just like so many Qing palace dramas, who can say that they can not have any similarities. I also wrote about the color palette. In terms of titles, they all belong to ethical texts. Nianxia will definitely want to call Nianshang by his name. In the early stage, as an elder, I would naturally think that Nianxia is neither older nor younger, which is rude. In terms of age, the author sets them as older sisters. From a practical point of view, the difference between them is 1 to 5. They should not be attached and eventually fall in love. You will snatch mine and I will snatch yours. Mom loves you a little more and dad loves her a little more. Between 6 and 10, it is a reasonable time. The senior year is already sensible and can take care of the junior class when the parents are very busy. If they are over 10 years old, the senior year has to go to school first, and there is not so much time to take care of the junior year. Next, if it had been longer, there would be no need for adoption, and this article would not exist; from the character setting, this article is about unrequited love in the second year, and it does not say that the sister also has the same love. In order not to trouble the sister, he began to degenerate himself. The sister died due to an accident, and the pig's feet were due to drinking and smoking, and may have been burned to death in the end; but in the other article, the two fell in love with each other, but they did not know it. Since they are all about rebirth, of course there must be rebirth. This article is just a single rebirth under the year. Since rebirth naturally seeks a happy ending, the previous life was not together, which is still a tragic ending. If we work hard to pursue it in this life, no matter how bad the ending is, it can be even worse than the previous life. In this environment, all kinds of coquettish selling under the year A cute person who eats tofu and crashes into a car must be said to be plagiarized. The other article is indeed a double rebirth. Although most of the articles cannot be discovered without careful reading, the result of the interaction between two rebirths is much more complicated than a single rebirth. Moreover, the article is not limited to these two rebirths, so it is bound to be more complicated. There is also the secret kiss. As a reborn Nianxia, I will definitely try my best to take advantage. It will naturally be a meme to rub against the quilt. Since we are all in the same bed, stealing a kiss while Nian is asleep may be a habitual thinking. If I am in the same bed with the person I like, I will also find a way to steal a kiss, and the secret kiss in this article is not too detailed. In another article, the secret kiss meme was lying in wait for a long time, and the Nian who was secretly kissed pretended to be asleep. The previous chapters can only be said to be similar when read. Given the general environment, there must be some limitations. Isn't it reasonable to have similar results? The author's writing style may not be as good as another author's writing style, but after reading the whole text, you can find that the author typed it word by word and took great pains to write it! However, because of some similarities in previous chapters, it was completely denied, even maliciously slandered and negative. The direction of the author's writing later is completely different from the direction of the other article. Although there are more sub-CP plots in the later period, it completely shows that this is the author's own idea! When you see those people who say things like human flesh, lock-up, suicide, etc., Are you really speaking out of your conscience? When you see those who say exactly the same thing, have you really read through the two books seriously? You did not read through both books, maliciously spreading rumors, which not only made more readers think that this article was plagiarized, but also made the readers of the other article feel angry. However, once the public explanation is made, more people who only read some of the previous chapters will think that the similarities in this article are plagiarism. The blow to the author may be even more serious. An article that he put a lot of effort into was defined as plagiarism, and the whole article was slandered. Some NCFs even made endless comments and negative comments! Let some readers who have not read the other article think that they have been deceived, and abruptly turn their liking for this article into disgust! As time goes by, the author of the other article may have forgotten this incident, and life remains the same without any impact or change. However, fans will come to humiliate me from time to time. This is seen from the comment time, and it is also true. However, the author of this article will always bear the blame for plagiarism, and may even never be in the mood to write Lily articles again. It doesn't say how good the author's writing style is, it doesn't say what the quality of the article is, and it doesn't say what the author's purpose is in writing the article! Is it really good to define the entire article as plagiarism just because some of the earlier plots are similar? Don't you know the destructive power and dissemination power of online words now? Don't you know that it is illegal to slander and spread rumors to a certain extent? Don't you know that slander to a certain extent will cause irreparable consequences for the parties involved! These are some of my feelings about some malicious slanders! I just hope that this article and the author can be treated fairly and not be given some false labels! Plagiarism has its own definition and distinction of plagiarism, attached at the end, I hope people who read my feelings can take a good look at the definition of plagiarism! ! !
Ps: Plagiarism refers to the act of stealing or modifying other people's works and treating them as one's own. Using the same method, completely or partially completely (settings, dialogue, concepts, lines, scenes, pictures, etc.) Copying other people's works or changing their form or content to a certain extent.
1). Plagiarizing and exploiting the thoughts, ideas and opinions of copyrighted works. Generally speaking, it is legally allowed for an author to freely use the themes, themes, opinions, ideas, etc. Reflected in another work to create new creations, and it cannot be considered plagiarism.
2). Plagiarizing and using the historical background, objective facts, statistics, etc. Of other people's works. The copyright laws of various countries do not protect the historical background, objective facts and statistics expressed in the work itself, and anyone can freely use it. However, completely copying someone else's words that describe objective facts and historical background may be considered plagiarism.
3). Plagiarism and fair use. Fair use is the legal basis for an author to exploit other people's works, and its scope is generally determined by each country's copyright law. Anything beyond the scope of fair use generally constitutes infringement, but does not necessarily constitute plagiarism.
4). Plagiarism and coincidence. Copyright protects original works, not first-time works. Similar works cannot be considered plagiarism if they are created completely independently by the author.
Offset the points gained by the previous boss.
So, can the author explain the plagiarism issue? It has been several months, why there is still no positive response?
Because many later readers do not understand the situation, let me explain why in many cases where they feel differently, they say this book is plagiarized. The story begins when the author of the original article sent out the palette of the previous dozen chapters, pointing out that this article may have been plagiarized, and made it clear that as long as the author of this article gives a reasonable explanation for the content of the palette, the original author will publicly apologize to the author of this article (either in the form of a lottery or forwarding). If this is just a misunderstanding, it can actually be easily resolved. Just explain it clearly to the author of the original article, which can not only get rid of the plagiarism hat, but also bring some readers to this article due to the relationship between the original author himself. It's good to explain things clearly. However, the author of this article did not give any meaningful response, not even a positive response! I just kept crying and said that I was going to be censored. I @a relatively authoritative big V and gave two links that could not be opened at all. Then after finishing this article, I disappeared. There was no news from a certain blog, and there was no news from Jinjiang. So, why do this? Whether you feel aggrieved or angry, a clear explanation is the best solution, why not? The most reasonable explanation is that this article is plagiarized, and the author simply took the money and ran away, so what if he lost his head? Anyway, as long as the article is not deleted or locked, the profit from this article will still belong to the author of this article. Don't say anything about being angry or dizzy. If you were really so courageous, I would have deleted and locked the article long ago.
I accidentally opened the comments and saw this article again. I was still angry when I saw the comments of the keyboard warrior. I just want to say to the author, come on, there is still a lot of room for improvement in writing. Come on~ This is an era of keyboard warriors. This is an era where people can criticize without knowing the truth. Don't take it too seriously. Whoever takes it seriously will lose. Being angry will also hurt your body. It hurts the liver~ Well, I can't be angry anymore, it's not worth it, so I ignore all keyboard warriors. You don't need to explain or explain, because there is no need at all~ If you are still writing articles~ I wish you better and better~ As I get older, I am always more verbose~ I won't write anymore, that's all~ Although I want to say a lot~
To be honest, I have never said such an exciting thing
Ahem, my moonstone is dedicated to the big one.
I hate those keyboards.
The only regret is that there is not enough money.
Like this book very much. Well, I really don't know what to say. Anyway, I just don't like those guys who grind dungeons, and I want to brush them back.
Alas~ I really want to say something but I don't know what to say, but I still want to say something! I'm just a reader who has read two books and give my personal opinion! I really doubt whether the word "righteous indignation" has a positive or derogatory meaning. I have read both articles. If I look at the details, there are many, many differences in the previous chapters. They are all rebirth articles, they are all modern articles, they are all ethics articles. If you write articles under the premise that each of them has already determined the direction of writing, it is very likely that there will be a crash. Isn't this excusable? Most TV dramas will indicate that "any similarities are purely coincidental." Since this sentence exists, there must be a reason for its existence. Just like so many Qing palace dramas, who can say that they can not have any similarities. I also wrote about the color palette. In terms of titles, they all belong to ethical texts. Nianxia will definitely want to call Nianshang by his name. In the early stage, as an elder, I would naturally think that Nianxia is neither older nor younger, which is rude. In terms of age, the author sets them as older sisters. From a practical point of view, the difference between them is 1 to 5. They should not be attached and eventually fall in love. You will snatch mine and I will snatch yours. Mom loves you a little more and dad loves her a little more. Between 6 and 10, it is a reasonable time. The senior year is already sensible and can take care of the junior class when the parents are very busy. If they are over 10 years old, the senior year has to go to school first, and there is not so much time to take care of the junior year. Next, if it had been longer, there would be no need for adoption, and this article would not exist; from the character setting, this article is about unrequited love in the second year, and it does not say that the sister also has the same love. In order not to trouble the sister, he began to degenerate himself. The sister died due to an accident, and the pig's feet were due to drinking and smoking, and may have been burned to death in the end; but in the other article, the two fell in love with each other, but they did not know it. Since they are all about rebirth, of course there must be rebirth. This article is just a single rebirth under the year. Since rebirth naturally seeks a happy ending, the previous life was not together, which is still a tragic ending. If we work hard to pursue it in this life, no matter how bad the ending is, it can be even worse than the previous life. In this environment, all kinds of coquettish selling under the year A cute person who eats tofu and crashes into a car must be said to be plagiarized. The other article is indeed a double rebirth. Although most of the articles cannot be discovered without careful reading, the result of the interaction between two rebirths is much more complicated than a single rebirth. Moreover, the article is not limited to these two rebirths, so it is bound to be more complicated. There is also the secret kiss. As a reborn Nianxia, I will definitely try my best to take advantage. It will naturally be a meme to rub against the quilt. Since we are all in the same bed, stealing a kiss while Nian is asleep may be a habitual thinking. If I am in the same bed with the person I like, I will also find a way to steal a kiss, and the secret kiss in this article is not too detailed. In another article, the secret kiss meme was lying in wait for a long time, and the Nian who was secretly kissed pretended to be asleep. The previous chapters can only be said to be similar when read. Given the general environment, there must be some limitations. Isn't it reasonable to have similar results? The author's writing style may not be as good as another author's writing style, but after reading the whole text, you can find that the author typed it word by word and took great pains to write it! However, because of some similarities in previous chapters, it was completely denied, even maliciously slandered and negative. The direction of the author's writing later is completely different from the direction of the other article. Although there are more sub-CP plots in the later period, it completely shows that this is the author's own idea! When you see those people who say things like human flesh, lock-up, suicide, etc., Are you really speaking out of your conscience? When you see those who say exactly the same thing, have you really read through the two books seriously? You did not read through both books, maliciously spreading rumors, which not only made more readers think that this article was plagiarized, but also made the readers of the other article feel angry. However, once the public explanation is made, more people who only read some of the previous chapters will think that the similarities in this article are plagiarism. The blow to the author may be even more serious. An article that he put a lot of effort into was defined as plagiarism, and the whole article was slandered. Some NCFs even made endless comments and negative comments! Let some readers who have not read the other article think that they have been deceived, and abruptly turn their liking for this article into disgust! As time goes by, the author of the other article may have forgotten this incident, and life remains the same without any impact or change. However, fans will come to humiliate me from time to time. This is seen from the comment time, and it is also true. However, the author of this article will always bear the blame for plagiarism, and may even never be in the mood to write Lily articles again. It doesn't say how good the author's writing style is, it doesn't say what the quality of the article is, and it doesn't say what the author's purpose is in writing the article! Is it really good to define the entire article as plagiarism just because some of the earlier plots are similar? Don't you know the destructive power and dissemination power of online words now? Don't you know that it is illegal to slander and spread rumors to a certain extent? Don't you know that slander to a certain extent will cause irreparable consequences for the parties involved! These are some of my feelings about some malicious slanders! I just hope that this article and the author can be treated fairly and not be given some false labels! Plagiarism has its own definition and distinction of plagiarism, attached at the end, I hope people who read my feelings can take a good look at the definition of plagiarism! ! ! Ps: Plagiarism refers to the act of stealing or modifying other people's works and treating them as one's own. Using the same method, completely or partially completely (settings, dialogue, concepts, lines, scenes, pictures, etc.) Copying other people's works or changing their form or content to a certain extent. 1). Plagiarizing and exploiting the thoughts, ideas and opinions of copyrighted works. Generally speaking, it is legally allowed for an author to freely use the themes, themes, opinions, ideas, etc. Reflected in another work to create new creations, and it cannot be considered plagiarism. 2). Plagiarizing and using the historical background, objective facts, statistics, etc. Of other people's works. The copyright laws of various countries do not protect the historical background, objective facts and statistics expressed in the work itself, and anyone can freely use it. However, completely copying someone else's words that describe objective facts and historical background may be considered plagiarism. 3). Plagiarism and fair use. Fair use is the legal basis for an author to exploit other people's works, and its scope is generally determined by each country's copyright law. Anything beyond the scope of fair use generally constitutes infringement, but does not necessarily constitute plagiarism. 4). Plagiarism and coincidence. Copyright protects original works, not first-time works. Similar works cannot be considered plagiarism if they are created completely independently by the author.
Offset the points gained by the previous boss.
So, can the author explain the plagiarism issue? It has been several months, why there is still no positive response?