Reborn: A Thousand Charms

I don't understand. No matter how grand this extra story is, it's not just that Lu Yan is planning to like the new and dislike the old again, right? The most important thing about love is action, not temptation. Feelings cannot withstand the test. Lu Yan almost cheated on her again in this episode, but she wanted to put all the blame on Xiaohan. "I'm sorry for you, just because you don't love me." Lu Yan felt that he was wronged, but who made him feel wronged? Isn't it the life he chose? Even without his presence, a woman like Xiao Han will still be loved by an outstanding man, and there will even be no grudges in her heart, and both parties will be devoted to each other. Why should she wrong herself because of being moved, so that when she grows old, she will be laughed at by others and experience the harm caused by the same person again? I think Lu Yan is still selfish after all, and I can't see love in him. Only my love for the heroine's character sustained me through reading this article. The extra is a failure and could have completely disappeared. After reading the extra, I feel that there is no difference between Lu Yan in the previous life and Lu Yan in this life.

That man is so disgusting, I don't even believe in love anymore

Alas, maybe Jiang Han behaved too coldly and rationally in this relationship. This is not the reason for Lu Ting's cheating. Maybe Lu Ting hasn't cheated yet, and he just wants to find the feeling of being with the young Jiang Han back then, but this is disgusting enough. What is a substitute? They look alike, have similar temperaments, and dress similarly, but they are not the same person. No two leaves in the world are exactly the same, let alone people. Maybe Lu Ting and Su Tingting really have nothing, but so what? Lu Ting is over fifty, not a young man in his twenties. I don't believe that Lu Ting can't understand what Su Tingting means. He thinks that Su Tingting is young, innocent, and looks like Jiang Han and should be taken care of. Everything is done by the media and Su Tingting's economic company and has nothing to do with Su Tingting. But just because of this, we should keep a distance from Su Tingting, no matter what the reason is (perhaps Su Tingting expressed her love to Lu Ting, emphasized that she would not destroy Lu Ting's marriage, just asked Lu Ting to accompany her to the amusement park and then left, etc.). , The matter was reported by the media), Su Tingting said to see if Jiang Han's reaction is that he loves Lu Ting, Lu Ting listened again, pretended to disappear, etc., Or something happened to Su Tingting's only relative, Lu Ting was worried about accompanying him, etc.), Lu Ting was disgusting to do this, who is Su Tingting to Lu Ting, Lu Ting deserves to go to the amusement park. Jiang Han should live alone. Anyway, Jiang Han never wanted to be with Lu Ting in his life.

Will it be updated tomorrow?

I think this knot cannot be untied Or should we just keep putting it off?

Almost forgot So because of this, the two of them HE?

Is it because the author's original cp was strongly opposed and suddenly lost its direction? Never give up on writing. Although I am confused, I still want to see the heroine be happy. Isn't it nice to be with Lu Yixuan?

This comment is waiting for review by the administrator and has been automatically blocked by the system. It will be displayed after passing the review!

Unexpectedly, Jinjiang got angry again and mercilessly swallowed my long review, vomiting blood. Fortunately, it was written in draft, and sensitive words were changed. I really hope the author can take a look. Haha, I guess the author is very depressed. He originally wanted to write a story about how to redeem a slightly flawed male protagonist. As a result, the male protagonist was scolded to death. It is useless for the author to emphasize that his three views are correct. The male protagonist is not that bad, but his mind is temporarily cheated. I don't know how the author defines spiritual infidelity? My definition is having a heartbeat but no action. I don't understand why the author always writes about the male protagonist in the dark when describing his past life. He goes home at midnight every day, is half-business and half-dating, and is so cold to the female protagonist that he almost treats her as transparent. Does the author think that the male protagonist and his mistress are not cheating without that last step? Is it a serious affair? If the interaction between the male protagonist and the mistress is just like the previous two chapters, I still agree that the male protagonist is just spiritually cheating. He is attracted to the mistress and is indifferent to the female protagonist, because it is the mistress who takes the initiative to have some intimate actions with him. He is attracted by it because he and the mistress are old acquaintances and know that the mistress is like this, so he does not refuse. But if the work date between the male protagonist and his mistress includes hugging and kissing, then they are in a relationship, right? It's only a matter of time before we get to the last step. Generally, couples have to go through the process in the end, at least two or three months. So the male protagonist is not on a spiritual level. He has completely cheated on him both mentally and physically? There is no heroine in his heart at all. Why the author insists on writing it so unclearly, in order to preserve the misery of the heroine in the previous life, he murmurs about the death of his own hero. The author doesn't think that in Chapter 41, the heroine is relieved that "Although Lu Ting was attracted to Xu Mo and indifferent to her, he did not have a relationship with Xu Mo?" Changing it to "Although Lu Ting was attracted to Xu Mo and indifferent to her, he did not make excessively intimate gestures towards Xu Mo" would better express the personality of the male protagonist and his only It means spiritual infidelity. Although the male protagonist is confused by the mistress and his heart is shaken by the female protagonist, he still has his own character. His enthusiasm for the mistress is just curiosity, but he still has feelings for the female protagonist, so he still restrains himself towards the mistress. The communication with the mistress is just like what we have seen in the previous two chapters, the mistress is just teasing and touching. Don't refuse the mistress's actions to deliberately create a close relationship with him, wouldn't this express the author's intention to express the personality of the male protagonist in the previous life? If the male protagonist and his mistress had already kissed and hugged each other in the previous life, I don't understand why the female protagonist should be happy that they didn't have a relationship. Do you still respect her until the last step? If it reaches this level and she still returns home every night, the male protagonist has cheated on her and trampled her self-esteem underfoot. So, what does the author think? Since we are looking at the interaction between the male protagonist and the mistress objectively from a third-party perspective, why do we have to talk about the male protagonist and the mistress in vague terms? No wonder everyone hates the male protagonist. Because no one would like a man who can have a passionate relationship with another woman when his wife is pregnant, and be so in love that he forgets the child and the child's mother, let alone kill the heroine because of this man's affair. Author, think about it for yourself. Is it really the readers who are being extreme, rather than you who are trying to kill your own male protagonist? I also think that if a man cheats on his wife while she is pregnant, then this man is garbage, or non-recyclable. I don't know if the author agrees, but such a man is just underwear for others. Regardless of whether he was reborn or something like that, how could he pretend that the betrayal didn't happen when it clearly happened? Unfortunately, it also cost an innocent life. The author emphasizes that the male protagonist in this life will not be tempted by things in the past life and will be a loyal dog. We should not replace him in the past life. To be honest, if the author hadn't written that the male protagonist in the previous life had nothing but the last step with his mistress, and only had his mistress in mind, causing the female protagonist to die tragically, and two lives? It was caused by the male protagonist's cheating. Which reader would accept this? If the male protagonist only gets along with the mistress as in the first two chapters, and the mistress finds someone to harm the female protagonist's child, I think it is still a matter of the mistress's character, and the male protagonist is still innocent. If the relationship between the male protagonist and the mistress is like a lover except for the last step, I think the male protagonist is absolutely responsible for the tragedy of one female protagonist being killed and two dead. He is the source of the tragedy, because he is the one who sent the message to the mistress that I love you, but I still have to marry the female protagonist because of her child. The love that the mistress wants is right in front of her, and the male protagonist is sure to love her. She removes obstacles for her lover, and the male protagonist does not take action personally. But it is his attitude towards the mistress that makes the mistress to be cruel. Two lives, as long as he is Lu Ting, he will bear two lives. How can he have the nerve to ask the female protagonist in this life to be with him? This is why everyone feels that the male protagonist is selfish and pretentious when watching the extra episode. If he hadn't responded enthusiastically to the mistress's feelings and refused to give the mistress a clear explanation, how could the mistress want to harm the heroine? What do you think, author? As long as you explain it clearly and don't hesitate so much, the male protagonist will not be so miserable by you. Everyone will hate him. As you know, the popular incident of Faye Wong and her mistress forcing her original wife to death is what everyone hates the most, because they not only hurt the original spouse, but more importantly, they hurt innocent lives. It is the most shameful and unforgivable to develop female sex during a woman's physical and mental vulnerability during pregnancy. After reading Chapter 41, I feel that the male protagonist is all ruthless and meaningless in cheating men except not getting to the last step with his mistress. Especially when you write it from the perspective of a third party. From the most objective point of view, even the male protagonist in this life can't stand it. The male protagonist in the previous life and the mistress are so ambiguous and passionately in love. How can the female protagonist magnify her uneasiness? If the male protagonist's cold personality responded so enthusiastically to the mistress's feelings as you wrote, he would definitely only have eyes for the mistress and not have the female protagonist and her children at all. So how could the male protagonist in his previous life be temporarily derailed? Why wasn't he the murderer who killed the heroine and the child? Such a male protagonist would still be burdened with the blood debt of two lives in another life. How could he repay it? Because how can a mother forgive the father who accepted her child for hurting my child for another woman? This is the bottom line, right? How can the male protagonist have the nerve to ask the female protagonist to make him compensate? How did he compensate? No matter how many times he dies in this life, no matter how much compensation he gets, it will never be acceptable. Therefore, the most depressing thing is probably the male protagonist. Even though he has always appeared as a loyal dog man in this life, he has not gained any favor at all. Instead, he has been accused of being a pretender and a scumbag. This is because you, the author, wrote that the male protagonist in the previous life was not an adulterer at all, but a real scumbag who killed his wife and children because he had an affair with his mistress. Why on earth do you want to love and support the male protagonist and yet hurt him like this? In fact, the heroine and the hero in the previous life could not see happiness at all. To be honest, the dull personality of the hero is more suitable for the mistress's cheeky personality. I think in the previous life, the mistress was aggressive and wanted to snatch the male protagonist away before his marriage. Her behavior was actually acceptable, because the female protagonist looked like a quail and didn't think she loved the male protagonist much. The male protagonist, who was also a workaholic, couldn't tell how much he liked the female protagonist. Lord, although I think the mistress is arrogant enough, why should she say that she is the hero's true love? Her language skills are actually quite low-level, and she looks like she is trying to squeeze out the heroine's position. Generally speaking, men are fine with it, but they probably won't be able to stand this kind of shamelessness for a long time. If she wasn't so crazy and wanted to kill the heroine's child, she would just be shameless in pursuit of her love. But the mistress is burdened with two lives and was able to get away with it in her previous life, which makes people hate her. Of course, readers must always tolerate the mistress's male protagonist to bear this hatred, so don't blame the readers for hating the male protagonist. The heroine was really useless in her previous life. She actually scared herself to death. What's that law called? The more you worry about it, the more things will happen. Isn't that the heroine? In the previous life, the heroine felt that she would do the same because her mother and sister had abandoned her, so she suppressed her personality and served the male protagonist with a low eyebrow. Even when she saw someone seducing her fiancé, she did not dare to stand up and defend her love and marriage for fear that the male protagonist would not like it. It's so pitiful that all the communication with the male protagonist for ten years was work. After resigning, she didn't even have a topic to talk about. She really lived a pathetic life. Children, current events, the past and the future that everyone has experienced, there are so many things that can be communicated to the male protagonist. Can it restore the male protagonist's heart that is about to cheat? The heroine didn't have any of it at all. Just like this, she watched the mistress approaching step by step, until she gave up her life after being plotted. The heroine was really hopeless in her previous life. Not only did she place her happiness and life on the hero, she also didn't know how to let the hero know that you would die without him. It wasn't that she was still pregnant with the child. I really don't think she had anyone to blame for her death. It was her who filled herself with negative energy and gave up on herself. She personally gave up on her own happiness. She didn't even dare to work hard. She only felt sorry for herself. It didn't make sense to just blame the shadow of her childhood. There were many people who had a worse childhood than her. No matter how hard they worked hard, it was impossible for her to lose without a fight. Love needs to be managed, and it does not mean that if you have been together for a long time, it will last forever. For example, the male protagonist and the female protagonist in the previous life, although they have worked together for ten years, they have no communication and no common interests except work. Two boring gourds, one only contributes silently, and the other is so accustomed to asking for things that he ignores the other's efforts. It makes sense that their relationship can be so easily shaken by the mistress. It's just that why should the author treat the readers so neatly that they not only require the male and female protagonists to bear the love debts and human lives of the previous life and recall them in this life, but also require the readers to separate the male and female protagonists in this life and the previous life and become two different people? This is not to force the reader to have a schizophrenic rhythm. No wonder the readers hate the male protagonist because how can they accept that he is not the same person in the previous life? In fact, a reader suggested that the parallel time and space can better express what the author wants to express. In the same time and space, the heroine is reborn before her death, determined to be herself and love herself. In this way, her attitude changes, to change the cheating male protagonist, to abuse the male protagonist, and to make him work hard to win back the female protagonist who has given up on him. Let the male protagonist understand that love is for both parties. Even if they will not die for each other, loyalty, care, management and gratitude are necessary. Isn't it better? The male protagonist's spiritual cheating is not so shameful, especially in your conception, the male protagonist is only temporary and not completely male. Why do you have to change your life? Wouldn't it be more meaningful to let the seemingly innocent male protagonists in this world, the male and female protagonists who know their mistakes and can correct them, grow up and learn to love amidst setbacks and ups and downs? If you insist on this rebirth setting, why bother writing the male protagonist's past life in the dark? In fact, his attraction to the mistress in his previous life is completely understandable, because he and the female protagonist already have problems. When you write, why do you write the male protagonist as a ruthless man who is obsessed with the mistress but completely ignores the pregnant female protagonist? Why doesn't the man who killed his wife and children call his underwear used by his mistress? Author, it's not that you said what the male protagonist's personality is like, readers will understand that he just cheated on his soul, but you wrote in detail that he was so ambiguous with the mistress, and responded so enthusiastically to the mistress's feelings. Even if the male protagonist in this life is just to see if they have taken the last step, how can such a male protagonist who is already in love with the mistress be considered spiritually cheating? How can readers accept the explanation that he is not like this, so they are even more disgusted with him, because they have already killed the heroine and their children because of his cheating, and they still don't realize the seriousness of their mistakes. They also lament that no one loves him more than the heroine. With such a male protagonist, no matter how loyal you are in this life, he will make people feel indifferent and think that he is a hypocritical and selfish scumbag. I want the author to arrange I think the author can be more fair to the male protagonist when writing about reliving his past life. The details will not emphasize the sadness of the female protagonist's previous life and how she was let down by the one she loved so much, and the male protagonist will not be criticized as much. For example, the plot of the mistress's application was explained in time, and the male protagonist urgently needed an assistant to help with all the work at hand because the heroine was pregnant, resigned, and was about to hold a wedding. In this way, the mistress's application and admission were much more reasonable. Although he was with the mistress every night, it was actually work, and he really wanted to continue his commitment to the heroine, but he just couldn't refuse some of the mistress's little moves. If the author could just say one or two more words, wouldn't you just say what you said before? Isn't the male protagonist's personality three-dimensional? The male protagonist doesn't explain because he really needs someone to work. The mistress is really the only suitable one in the short term. It's not his intention. He has never responded proactively with the mistress. (As I said, the heroine is glad that he didn't do any intimate actions. This reflects more of the heroine's despair at home alone. The heroine has no self-confidence and faces the mistress's initiative and intimacy with the male protagonist. Xiang is very uneasy, so he ignores the fact that the male protagonist is just trying to find time to get married. Then the male protagonist in his previous life will not be so miserable in your writing. You just say that the male protagonist is not like this and what his character is like, but in the details, you write him as an irretrievable scumbag. Will readers like me not be entangled? I don't know if what I said above is the male protagonist you want to write, but if Author, you insist that the male protagonist just made a small mistake common to ordinary people in his previous life, and there is no need to write anything in particular. Explain in detail the reason why the male protagonist and the mistress work together, and change the female protagonist's emotions. Everyone will understand and believe that the male protagonist is really just temporarily attracted to the passionate mistress. Why do you have to use the male protagonist himself and the female protagonist in the rare time of reliving the previous life? How can I use the protagonist's emotion to highlight the misery of being let down by the heroine and the ruthlessness of the hero? If what I imagined for the hero was not what you wanted to write, and the previous life of the hero and his mistress were as rampant and openly trampling on the dignity of the heroine as a fiancée as written in Chapter 41, then maybe you, the author, really think that as long as a man keeps his body, everything else can be forgiven. I know that the author worked very hard, and it was very depressing to see the male protagonist that we all hate so much, but can the author understand how we readers feel when we see such a male protagonist? Can the author explain it clearly? I'm so confused whether to continue watching it, because I'm getting more and more depressed and unhappy as I watch it. No matter how much I abuse the male protagonist, I can't accept it even if I think of the heroine accepting the man who cheated and killed her own flesh and blood. I think of the mistress getting away with killing people, and I feel that no matter how the heroine is reincarnated, I feel aggrieved. Am I taking one corpse and two lives too seriously, or does the author think that two lives are nothing? Alas~~~ Actually, we readers are more depressed than the author (the most depressing thing is that Jinjiang keeps deleting my comments, which makes me vomit blood)

Is Jinjiang smoking? Why is there so much money deducted for this chapter? Also, I cried after devouring my long review of the previous chapter Fortunately, I can type it with memo and I can send it once, but I can send it without marking it, so why? Can you, the author, take a look? I've coded a lot of words~~Don't you think you wrote the male protagonist in the dark? Why did he behave like a normal person when he fell in love with Xu Mo despite his mental cheating? Or do you think that the male protagonist is wrong, no matter how bad it is, how to write it to keep a loyal dog in this life? Is this really good for the hero? It's hard to accept a man who killed his wife and children due to an affair, and it's the same for him to be reborn. To be honest, when I read this chapter, even though the male protagonist in this life has cleared the line with the mistress in this life, and saw the heroine in the previous life die tragically and everything has returned to dust, I still feel depressed. I just feel that the male protagonist in this life has become like the mistress in the previous life. He is so confident that it is inexplicable. How can the female protagonist be willing to attend his mother's birthday after experiencing her own death one more time? How could he be so confident in asking the heroine to go? No wonder everyone doesn't like him. And neither the male protagonist nor the female protagonist seems to have any feelings for that child? Or do they not realize why the tragedy happened? Maybe now the heroine doesn't love the hero, not even his children. However, as a reader, it is really because the heroine died in the previous life that it was difficult to blame the hero. He acted like a loyal dog for not doing anything in this life, but the author, his firmness towards the heroine is all because he felt that he had failed the heroine in the previous life, so he had to make up for it in this life. Even the hero himself was carrying debts from the previous life. Although the previous life was over, the damage was so deep. In the hearts of the two of them, the change of the heroine is a manifestation of people experiencing extreme pain. If the hero says it, it will be difficult to feel that he is innocent in this life. If he was really just mentally cheating in his previous life, his efforts in this life are still worthy of understanding and acceptance. Otherwise, if you write that he and his mistress were both passionate and cheating, please get out of here no matter how regretful it is. I want to ask, is there any retribution for the mistress in the previous life who killed two people and got away with it like this? It's so unreasonable, why are two human lives so unimportant just because the heroine can be reborn? If there could be a side story about the mistress in her previous life, for example, where did she get the motive to be cruel to the heroine? Was it because she couldn't get the response she wanted from the hero, but the hero was still determined to marry the heroine? Or the male protagonist begins to restrain himself from dating. All of this does not mean that the male protagonist in the previous life only temporarily cheated on the mistress, but he is still firmly responsible for the female protagonist. Such a male protagonist can be said to be regretful for the female protagonist's tragedy, and the male protagonist's compensation in this life is much more reasonable. At least he also has that kind of confidence. Otherwise, as the author wrote before, the male protagonist had a heated relationship with his mistress because of his cheating, and gave the mistress a desire to quickly rise to the top, which led to the tragedy of the female protagonist. Then how could the male protagonist, a murderer, have the confidence to demand that the female protagonist accept compensation from him in this life? I'm still very optimistic about Lu's male counterpart, and I hope that the heroine will be free and unrestrained with him in this life, work hard to manage love, and leave behind the wrong person she fell in love with in the previous life. But the author insists on not changing the male protagonist, but don't make the male protagonist such a scumbag, don't make him the kind of scumbag who had an affair with his mistress and killed his first wife. Such a scumbag will still be a scumbag in another life, because his fault is not mental cheating, but immorality and unfaithfulness, which ruthlessly drove his first wife to death. A top scumbag, an irrecyclable scumbag, no matter how loyal he is in this life, I feel that he is so shameless and pretentious, I really can't like him, I just want to tell him to get out. Depressed, continue to be depressed, how can I continue to look at such a male protagonist? It's so indifferent~~~ When I see him show his kindness and act like a loyal dog, I just feel so hypocritical. It's really not that I have a deep prejudice against him. It's you, my own mother, who went to hell to discredit him. It's you who made us all hate the male protagonist.