Rujin just can't understand it. Why should a legitimate daughter lose to a concubine-born daughter? Why must the villainess always lose to the heroine?
P.S. This story updates monthly or yearly. Don't read it if that bothers you.
I feel like I clicked on it accidentally half a month ago, and I clicked on it specifically today to see if there are any updates, which is really disappointing. It's been so long since the author didn't want to write and stop occupying the list. I really doubt that the author is an editor in Jinjiang or something.
Wow, what kind of pit is this? I haven't updated it for a long time.
I also don't understand those people who give negative marks. It's not a V-stamp, they don't charge money, and they don't ask you to look at them. That's free service.
To be honest, even if the free article is a scam, I should say thank you to the author. After all, it makes the reader happy for a few seconds.
Because I have made pitfalls, but in the end I couldn't hold on and fell into a pit again. So, author, I understand you. Code wording is just like going to the toilet. When you feel something, you will lose consciousness. If you are constipated, you may not be able to hold in a word for many days. As for negative points or something, don't worry too much about it. The same rice feeds all kinds of people, not to mention there are so many varieties of rice in the world. I have eaten several varieties of rice this year. After reading the comments, a dear friend is actually right. Since Jinjiang has set up this function, readers can and should use it. It's just that the author worked hard to write the words, and readers should also be more understanding.
What's going on, just one chapter on the list?
I don't understand what's going on with the various lists in Jinjiang, but I only wrote about a thousand words and it got listed.
I like this kind of article very much, and the author's writing style makes people want to read more. I just want to ask, can it be faster?
I really couldn't help but come in and give it a negative score. I clicked on it several times and couldn't remember the name. When I clicked on it, I saw why this one was on the list again.
What's the point of opening a trap like this? Is it purely an act that harms others and benefits oneself?
The author has time to explain, so why not continue to fill in the holes. It's really uncomfortable that a chapter has taken so long and still dominates the list.
I feel like I clicked on it accidentally half a month ago, and I clicked on it specifically today to see if there are any updates, which is really disappointing. It's been so long since the author didn't want to write and stop occupying the list. I really doubt that the author is an editor in Jinjiang or something.
Wow, what kind of pit is this? I haven't updated it for a long time.
I also don't understand those people who give negative marks. It's not a V-stamp, they don't charge money, and they don't ask you to look at them. That's free service. To be honest, even if the free article is a scam, I should say thank you to the author. After all, it makes the reader happy for a few seconds.
Because I have made pitfalls, but in the end I couldn't hold on and fell into a pit again. So, author, I understand you. Code wording is just like going to the toilet. When you feel something, you will lose consciousness. If you are constipated, you may not be able to hold in a word for many days. As for negative points or something, don't worry too much about it. The same rice feeds all kinds of people, not to mention there are so many varieties of rice in the world. I have eaten several varieties of rice this year. After reading the comments, a dear friend is actually right. Since Jinjiang has set up this function, readers can and should use it. It's just that the author worked hard to write the words, and readers should also be more understanding.
What's going on, just one chapter on the list?
I don't understand what's going on with the various lists in Jinjiang, but I only wrote about a thousand words and it got listed.
I like this kind of article very much, and the author's writing style makes people want to read more. I just want to ask, can it be faster?
I really couldn't help but come in and give it a negative score. I clicked on it several times and couldn't remember the name. When I clicked on it, I saw why this one was on the list again.
What's the point of opening a trap like this? Is it purely an act that harms others and benefits oneself?
The author has time to explain, so why not continue to fill in the holes. It's really uncomfortable that a chapter has taken so long and still dominates the list.