Power and Prestige in a Wealthy Family

Just saw this on the site Topic: Complaint against the author Xueluo Yingwu, who was found guilty of plagiarism and then maliciously cursed the reporter and editor in other articles [20,262] God, I don't know what that amazing poster grew up on. He blamed all the readers' curses on Xueluo. I really don't know what to say. His titanium alloy dog eyes were really blinded. Although I know that it is wrong to curse people, it is superfluous for such a scumbag who confuses right and wrong. At the same time, I also ask that scumbag to see clearly, who is scolding you? Don't say Xueluo comes to scold you again.

Speaking of which, I have been following the article "Legendary Son" for a long time. It is undeniable that I really liked reading it at the beginning, otherwise I would not have spent money to read it. However, as the article unfolded and progressed, I felt more and more that the article was dragging and I was speechless about the CP, so I abandoned the article. Even if I didn't like reading it, I never complained about it because my views do not represent everyone's views. In other words, just because I don't like it doesn't mean that the article is not well written. It's just that everyone has their own preferences for radish and green vegetables. But I like the article "The Concubine" very much. Since this is my favorite article, I am willing to support the article "The Concubine". Is it wrong for me to defend the article that I like? I really can't understand why someone would attack me because I support the article "The Bastard". Haha, I can only say that those people are too self-centered! Do you think that everyone has to act according to your ideas? Xueda, I'm not good at writing, and I don't know what to write, but I really enjoyed reading your article "Concubine". The happiest thing every day is to see that the articles I like in the collection have been updated, and then click to read them one by one. Then that feeling of satisfaction is my spiritual food for the day. So that day, I happily clicked on Shuzi's article, only to find that the link was gone. I thought the website was down again. When I was finally told that the article was locked, my first reaction was sadness, followed by anger… Just like that, the articles I like to read cannot be updated at the moment, and I still want to know who Xiao Shou's CP is, and now I have become a mystery… I also want to know whether Xiao Shou will be forced to retreat and fight back under the attack and pressure from various forces in the future? There is no hope for the time being… I can't figure out how such a low-key concubine who likes to pretend to be someone offended the concubine faction? Is it because he is too tolerant and pretends to be stupid that those self-righteous legitimate sons think that he is easy to bully? Maybe it is true to the saying, a good person will be bullied by others, and a good horse will be ridden by others! This is also the sadness of the author of Little Transparent! It's easy to be lenient, but why are there so few particularly radical readers in the world? They usually don't do anything (they don't write articles, they only make bricks), they just like to go through different lists of articles and leave self-righteous comments. Their words are arrogant, radical, and pungent. They think they are "gods" and they are the only one who thinks they are the only one. They don't consider the feelings of the author who worked hard to write, or the mood of other readers. Some people may say that they have a clear distinction between love and hate, and some may say that they are full of food and support, but they still go their own way and are very happy. They like to give "-2" to the articles they don't like, and never see the author's efforts. They can use fierce words to criticize the authors they don't like. Being cunning and mean is synonymous with them. They dare to try any way to vent their inner pleasure. The more unhappy you are, the happier they will be, the more sad you are, the happier they will be, and the more angry you will be, the more they will feel a sense of accomplishment! To be honest, people are impulsive. There are times when I read an article and I feel unhappy, and there are times when I complain when I reply to a review. However, even if I don't like an article, I have never given a negative mark, and I have never criticized the author in the article. I don't appreciate it, which only represents my personal opinion. Since I don't like it, it's nothing more than clicking a cross, deleting the favorites, and then turning a blind eye. I really can't understand how someone could give "-2" so easily? Put yourself in their shoes, if one day you, one of those experts in making bricks, write an article (although this possibility is very small), and someone else comes to help you, would you feel aggrieved? Are you lost? Are you happy? Creation requires motivation. If the author has something unsatisfactory, you can point it out and make suggestions instead of just suppressing and criticizing. Otherwise, how many writers can continue to survive in Jinjiang? The last thing I want to say is, Xueda, there are still many readers who like and want to read your article. Although it is locked now, it may be deleted in the future. However, being locked or deleted does not mean that everyone thinks you have plagiarized. It can only mean that some people have different views, and some people have succeeded. The reason for your failure is that the small shrimps cannot compete with the big fish. I have always believed that you should stand up from where you failed. Many readers suggested that you simply switch to other websites. I don't think it is necessary. I am not afraid of the shadow slanting if I am upright. At worst, I will rewrite it. I don't seek to exceed it, just to have peace of mind! There are still many readers who will always support you. As for those abusers who like to take the initiative to verbally attack others, please be more sensible. Your views do not represent everyone's views. Please "be kind"!

Script: The battle between concubines and concubines Actor: "It's Difficult for the True Son" as the legitimate son "The Helplessness of the Second Son of the Prince's Concubine" as the Concubine Plot: As a legitimate legitimate son, he was born to be in the spotlight and enjoy unlimited glory. And the life of a concubine is destined to be full of twists and turns, from being ignored to showing his talents to being suppressed... What will be the outcome, will he be strangled or start a new family? (Looking forward to HE)

The two articles can indeed be regarded as similar articles, and the author must have been deeply influenced by them. However, as a reader who has read both books seriously, I can responsibly say that it is not plagiarism at all.

Why can it be locked? It's so good-looking. Support the author. To be honest, this article is different from the legitimate son, but the names are a bit similar. By the way, don't the ancient house fights and palace fights all have the same routine? Can those who give negative marks stop looking jealous and giving random marks?

To be honest, I have read both articles. The background of this article is 70% similar to that of the legitimate son, but the content and plot are completely different. It is much better than the legitimate son. At least I am still following every chapter, but I stopped following the legitimate son when I saw that the male protagonist can talk. A mother who can talk is not bad for the legitimate son, and the emperor's uncle is supportive. The plot has no extension at all, and it is just a drag. But the male protagonist wants to be an idle royal family. The story of a man who was treated as a mediocre person and then was sent to the supreme position, and then blackmailed the civil and military officials of the entire dynasty. The two articles are completely different, so they are not plagiarism. The same background but different story content is considered fan fiction. JJ is 70% of a fan, so jj can lock all the articles. Even the background is not exactly the same, and the content is much more interesting, so it is not considered plagiarism. Only those who have read the article are qualified to comment, not to mention that I have read both articles. I am not biased, I am just telling the truth.

Even if you brush up your scores, you still plagiarize. . Even if you plagiarize, you still won't admit it. . .

Sir, I have never read Bastard. I like this type of writing very much, but I don't like to follow it, so I keep saving it. I just found out on the site that Bastard has been locked, so I can only use this place to tell you that we support you. Theme: Restoring the innocence of "The Helplessness of the Second Son of the Prince's Concubine" [1,21] Jinjiang in the palm of your hand——Braun e-book I have been following Xueluo's article "Second Son". Two days ago, I saw some readers saying that the book plagiarized "The First Son Is Difficult". Today I found out that "Second Son" has been blocked. I was very shocked. I also watched "The First Son" and it was completely different from "The Second Son". I would like to ask, if the ancient palace fights have left out those specific emperors, princes, ministers, and eunuchs, can they still be regarded as palace fights? Come on Xueluo, we support you. №0 ☆☆☆Liu Xiaoya left a message on 2012-09-28 13:59:20☆☆☆ Jinjiang Mall-Soya Milk Maker, Yogurt Maker, Small Home Appliances Hot Sale Why is it locked? Can you give me the reason? I like to read this now. I finally found this type of article, but before I could read it, it was locked. If it is determined to be plagiarism, please let me know who has been plagiarized and where it has been plagiarized. Don't block the article as soon as someone complains about plagiarism, pornography, or violence without even reading it, and order you to get rid of it immediately, or else I'll scold you here every day. №1 ☆☆☆Suo Wen's mother is a chicken and his father is a duck. He left a message on 2012-09-28 15:47:31☆☆☆ If you support adults, please go to the station and complain. It's useless if there are too few people.

Sir, why did you lock that article?

Hey-hey! I kiss you! I'm busy too! The child is sick again! The autumn wind is blowing, enteritis is coming! Worried me to death