Female Sophist

The golden lawyer traveled through ancient times and became an "adulterer" who was about to be punished! When she opened her mouth in court, she shocked the entire dynasty—— Bai Qianxue, a top modern lawyer, died suddenly in his office after winning the case. When she opened her eyes, she was tied up in the ancestral hall wearing a wedding dress, and heard the sentence of "adultery in the pond". Faced with the county magistrate's disregard for human life, the arrogant frame-up of the nobles, and the thousand-year-old cannibalistic law of etiquette—— She turned over "Qing Law" with her backhand and sneered: "The procedure is illegal and the case is invalid." From then on, the judicial circles of the Qing Dynasty ushered in the most terrifying "sophist": · To defend the indentured slaves who were beaten to death, she introduced the principle of "balance of consideration" and broke the "owner's privilege of life and death" for the first time - the nobles were furious! · To overturn the verdict of a scholar who was convicted of speech, she proposed that "the crime of speech requires actual harm" and pointed at the literary prison - the court was in an uproar! · To avenge the imperial merchants who were forced to death by the monopoly contract, she introduced the concept of "obvious unfairness" and shaken the century-old business order - the powerful were afraid! However, her real opponent has just surfaced: Shang Muxiao, the minister of Dali Temple, appears to be a cold-faced and strict judicial machine, but secretly he is an intelligence chief disguised as a playboy. He grabbed her wrist: "Bai Qianxue, your sophistry is shaking the foundation of the country." But she looked directly at him: "If the country is unfair, it should be shaken." The regent Mo Jingchen, the most powerful man in the palace, regards her as the sharpest edge in the chess game. He threw out the bait: "Join my shogunate and I will allow you to reform the laws of the world." But she shook her head: "My justice is not under the roof of the powerful." When "procedural justice" encounters "substantive justice"