Humanity's End? Ask the Heisei Riders First

It's good looking. So far, the weekend Valkyrie fics on Tomato are considered to be in the first echelon. Reversing time and space 🤦 In that case, let's take a look again 🍉

This is a very excellent book about knights. I beg the author to update it as soon as possible [Sending my heart] Well, I went back and carefully reviewed the previous five battles. I still felt that the loss in the fifth battle was too outrageous. Yajida, who represents the infinite possibilities of human beings, lost to the gods who represent the caste system. This is completely anti-human.

It's pretty good, why do some people say that it is actually the spirit of chivalry and the seniors who brought us up together? So we cannot accept the fact that we are moving forward together and are angry at being defeated by this so-called god. I explained it blindly because I didn't read it. In the new chapter, Yajida, who was fighting for the destiny of mankind, was defeated by Shiva in India. Let's not talk about the meaning of the two. Three consecutive games were narrow defeats... To be honest, I can understand the other knights in the fifth game, but are you saying that Yajituo, the human knight who kicked the God of Creation, lost? Has the tokusatsu disaster finally come? (Sad)

It's pretty good-looking, and overall interesting. Big cheers for the author (I wrote the wrong comment just now) Yajita's loss was inexplicable, but the others could understand. However, it is incomprehensible to write down representatives who rebel against the will of gods for the sake of the outline.

Looks good. I hope it will be built soon. As a fake fan, I feel helpless when the fourth boy (Dragon Rider) fails to win... But if the fake mask can't defeat the God of War, there is no way to fight... The author is so miserable... The knights will be scolded if they lose, but they will be scolded if they win. In fact, this book is very good and has many interesting points. I don't understand Yajituo's loss… First of all, the four boys were written to death (the universe is not as good as the sea, it may be because the popularity is low and there are not many people who wrote and criticized it). Dragon Knight was written to death again... I just saw the Yajituo part today and I was speechless🤔 I have run out of lightning protection rabbits.

It's a good article. From the current perspective, it's at least T1 level among Tomato Knight articles. The main drawback is that the fighting is a bit turn-based. It's basically a cycle where one party makes a move, one party suffers a loss, and then moves again, and the other person suffers a loss. Finally, the ultimate blow is used to determine the outcome. I hope there can be improvements in this aspect. In addition, I personally don't think it matters about the defeat of the knight. Aunt Dong has so many holster battles and it seems that she has become desensitized to the knight's combat power. As long as she doesn't lose too hard, that's it. Emmm... It's a bit difficult to comment on at the moment. Of the three knight-defeating games, I think only Si Chai has good writing. Even though the defeat was honorable, both the knight side and the god side had excellent sculpting, and the battles were quite interesting. As for Dragon Knight and Yajituo, I can only give an average evaluation. Both the battle and the sculpting of both sides were too bland. Considering the main audience of this book, it is commendable that the author dared to write about the three consecutive defeats of the knights, but it is better not to have such courage. Even if we do not consider things like fighting crickets, losing three games in a row is still too much. The candidates for the defeated knights are also difficult for readers to accept. I hope that the arrangement of the defeated candidates and the description of the game process can be more thoughtful in the future. Although there have been a lot of criticisms, I still hope that the book will get better and better, and I also hope that some readers will not be too extreme. The recent plot arrangement of the book does have quite a problem in my opinion, but it is still not a deduction for being anti-human and having incorrect views.

This book is really beautiful. It presents the spirit of chivalry to the audience in a very profound way. The combat power is balanced and the characters are perfectly consistent with the original work. I recommend everyone to read it. It is as good-looking as the masterpiece "Ultra: Human Betrayal?" In my opinion. "I Backhandedly Choose Darkness" recommends everyone to read this novel and suggests that the author also change the title of the novel to "Knight: The End of Humanity?" Ask us Heisei Knights first

It's very good-looking. It writes out things in a timely manner that netizens only dare to imagine. That's okay. Suddenly changed.

It is indeed different from Shuangwen: the fighting in this novel is very good, although it must be written well. After all, most of the content of Valkyrie at the end is fighting, but you cannot deny that he has problems with the plot of fighting, and his writing and drama are also good.

It's good, but it's a pity that Ryuki and Gentaro died. The review is early. If Gentaro is gone, I can think that the value is low; if Shinji is gone, I can think that the author convinced myself for the plot. But Yajitha lost. I really think I couldn't convince myself. Yajitha was originally set to have infinite evolution and it was unlikely that he would lose. Moreover, he was also a god-killer. The black gods who corresponded to God were all defeated by Yajitha. How could you, Shiva, who is not the original myth, win?