Period: A Villain Has to Be Bad, Right?

It's Chapter 84. Although the heroine is a villain, she doesn't take the initiative to hurt others. Although the hero and heroine have changed from lovers to enemies, what does it have to do with our villain heroine? She is just acting as the original hero's affectionate girlfriend according to the plot. She also gave the original hero three chances and reminded him many times. However, the original hero just didn't believe it. Whether he was really stupid or pretending to be stupid, things were done by himself, so the final result can only be borne by the original hero and heroine. Of course, it cannot be ruled out that the current villain heroine is much colder and smarter than the original villain heroine. After all, one was born through hard work in a post-apocalyptic society. She is just cold-hearted and cold-hearted. She is already abiding by the rules if she does not do evil. We really cannot expect her to be like the original villain heroine, a simple and timid girl who was pampered by her elders and grew up. In today's society, adult college students can become all kinds of old oilers if thrown into it for ten years, let alone her who has no abilities in the apocalypse since she was a child. It looks good, at least it looks good so far.

It's okay, but the heroine's force value is too low and she has no ability to protect herself, but her scheming and strategizing are pretty good. I prefer a heroine who is selfish and doesn't help the poor.

Not bad, the heroine is relatively scheming and skillful among her peers, but she is still a bit immature compared to those old foxes. He can't hide his expression outside, but he can do it well in front of the target person, but once he is out of sight, his face immediately changes. That is, under the arrangement of the author, he can only be seen by the person named Su, otherwise he has to be careful about capsizing.

It has always been very consistent with the character. The author has also been saying that the heroine has no three views. There was no collapse all the way. But I think she is still a good person. She has some bad intentions and some cynicism, but she does not really harm good people. Even if he harms someone in the bullpen, he still knows that the person in the bullpen is a bad person. So most people can't see this.

It's good to watch. I feel that the original male protagonist's character is well written and he has more presence than the male protagonist [laughing and crying]

I finished reading it in one go. The apocalypse is inherently morally corrupt. There is nothing wrong with selfishness. Although it does not have strong force value and the sense of supernatural power is very weak, it is more like a holy mother than other apocalypse. It is full of compassion. It is much better to lower the requirements for men and not be vigilant at all. I feel that someone finally has the brains to write an article.

White skirt ➕ Countryside ➕ Era. If you don't know how deadly these combinations are, you can check out the mud wedding in the countryside (this only lasts three or two days)

Not bad, a bit like a different kind of reborn villain's revenge,

It's good-looking, and the arrangement of the male protagonist in the end is also very good, and the crime will not lead to death.

It looks good. I like bad guys with clear goals. After all, I'm not a good person either [laughing][laughing][laughing][laughing]