The True Qin Shi Huang: Benevolent Rule Over All Under Heaven

As the author said, the first time I knew Qin Shihuang was because of "Meng Jiangnu Crying at the Great Wall". I was too young at that time and didn't have much impression. It wasn't until I went to junior high school that the teacher also said that Qin Shihuang was a tyrant. Then I watched a documentary that talked about the Qin and Han dynasties, and their views on Regarding the attitude of the Xiongnu, the First Emperor directly fought them, while the Han Dynasty adopted the policy of peace and marriage, so he read many books about the First Emperor one after another, and he had more respect for the First Emperor in his heart. Looking at the subsequent dynasties, how they treated their enemies, the Han Dynasty could not defeat them. , Make a marriage, Jin Dynasty, can't fight, run away, Sui Dynasty, lose, I will fight, Tang Dynasty, can't fight, sign a treaty, make peace, Song Dynasty, can fight, cede land, can't fight, cede land and pay compensation, Ming Dynasty, don't cede land, don't pay indemnity, don't make peace, don't pay tribute, but I abandon the border, Qing Dynasty North Korea, cannot be defeated, signed unequal treaties, paid indemnities and ceded territory, not to mention other aspects, it is simply a dimensionality reduction blow. The author analyzes the real His Majesty the First Emperor from different angles and different concepts, which is enough to show that the First Emperor is the true Mingde Saint King, and truly explains what For the sake of Guizhou, the leader of the world, and for future generations, what is the only emperor through the ages? Only Yingzheng, the ancestor of China, only the First Emperor!

Since he did not kill a single hero, the four thousand-year-old projects of Qin Zhidao, Great Wall, Ling Canal, and Zheng Guo Canal were built and even spies could be reused. Although Qin people's power was consumed, none of them were selfish, and everything they did was for Qin. It can be seen that his pattern is not ordinary.

I think what Mr. Cheng said is the most correct: Keep in mind the principles of reading history, read more event records and less the author's conclusions. "Historical Records" is undoubtedly a masterpiece, but Sima Qian did use some Spring and Autumn writing techniques. I think the reason why Sima Qian added some unnecessary bits and pieces to mislead readers is more for political correctness than for the sake of preservation. After all, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty did not allow him to write "Historical Records". Just like the current movie review, if he hadn't revised it again and again, he would have been killed long ago. It is also possible that later generations of the Han Dynasty had burned "Historical Records" long ago, or the revision was even worse. Qin Shihuang's "Ren Ding the Four Seas" is worth reading. The first emperor, who had a more comprehensive experience, also learned how to read historical materials and news so as not to miss the truth.

Bring order to Brother Zheng Although he has never killed the hero, he is said to be violent and suspicious. It is clear that there are many dangers in ascending the throne, but it is said that he is taking advantage of the achievements of his ancestors. Historical books have always been written by Confucianists. Even though they are full of doubts and contradictions, few people have verified them with reasonable evidence, or at least few have been circulated. Thanks to the author for his objective and detailed analysis. All possible factors were added together to analyze and come up with the one that is most consistent with the logic of action. I can't say that it has restored the facts 100%, but we can't just listen to one family's opinion when it comes to history, so we might as well take a look.

Showing another side of Qin Shihuang, history is written by the victor after all

Looking at it from different angles, we see a different Qin Shihuang. Qin made clothes for Han to wear, all aspects of them.

You have to look at history with dialectical thinking, because you never know how unscrupulous a group of people will do to slander someone.

I think the author's perspective has given me an inspiration, that is, a layman will find a different perspective after a try, and he is probably right (I am not saying that the author is a layman, but I think of things that I usually don't understand and try to be enlightened by people who don't understand it. If I insist on saying that there are many in Conan), of course, I agree with Teacher Yi, just from the perspective of a reader, not from the perspective of agreeing with the book.

From an angle I have never thought of, it seems that history cannot just be read through words.

I have read part of it so far, and it is very meaningful for non-professionals who have not read historical records, interpreting history from another perspective. Horizontally compare the practices of different kings with the same status, look at him from the perspective of the king, and understand his different strategies from the social background of the time. Reading history can be wise. If it is not a result-only theory that believes that Qin destroyed him, he must be a tyrant to understand it.