Apocalyptic Disasters: My Rules Are the Rules

This author's portrayal of natural disasters is arguably the best; the disaster is depicted with exquisite detail and is truly remarkable. Why is the rating so low when it should be at least 9 points?

A truly captivating story! The author, "" (a pseudonym), demonstrates exceptional talent in both its intellectual depth and its analysis of society and human nature. Why then is the score only in the sixties? Perhaps the author didn't focus on improving the score? That's understandable; writing such a compelling and insightful story requires immense effort. Keep it up, and keep striving for the readers who are meant to read it! 👍👍👍

A book expert with over 20 years of experience highly recommends this book. Don't be fooled by the rating; this book is at least a 9.5. It would be an injustice if this book wasn't popular, but unfortunately it isn't. Is it because there are too many taboos that platforms dare not promote it?

To be honest, it's really well-written. It truly captures the meaning of the word "apocalypse." Too many apocalyptic novels start with societal collapse, the loss of humanity, and state machinery that seems like paper. Unless the earth explodes, any disaster has a process; people who have lived in peacetime for a long time can't simply abandon their humanity overnight.

The description of real society is incredibly impressive.

In my personal opinion, this is a very good book. It was easy for me to get into, and it's very well written. It's an apocalypse, so I can understand who dies. Life is unpredictable, and there's no such thing as a smooth journey. A 7.8 Rating is a bit of an underestimation of this book. Great job, keep it up! Having read up to chapter 987, it's hard to give a proper review.

This is the best post-apocalyptic novel I've read so far. The characters are well-written, and there are no zombies, superpowers, or other weird tropes, which fits the genre perfectly. However, the updates are too slow. I don't understand why the rating is so low; I've been a bookworm for over a decade. I feel it's much better than those highly-rated novels; it must be being maliciously downgraded…

This is much better than the top-ranked post-apocalyptic novels; the setting is more logical. Unlike one book where the protagonist doesn't build a faction, but instead collects billions of dollars worth of supplies from Walmart and orders hundreds of banquets just for himself and his harem.

Why is the rating so low? This book is better than most books with a score of 9 or higher. The author is intelligent, logical, and writes naturally with emotion; some parts particularly well capture the bleakness and helplessness of the apocalypse. The characters are very well-developed, fully embodying the word "diverse." The protagonist is ruthless but not heartless, intelligent, courageous, and resourceful—a very good book!

I think this is the best post-apocalyptic novel I've ever read. Some people think the author made the protagonist, Wu Jun, seem like a saint, but I think the author portrayed the protagonist very meticulously. Humans are inherently contradictory; no one is entirely good or entirely evil. Others think the pacing of the plot is too slow.