They Dug Up My Childhood Toys During Demolition, Shocking the Academy of Sciences

In fact, there is absolutely no need for the author to follow Tony's route. Tony's Mark Armor actually has relatively poor combat effectiveness. The main reason is that Tony himself is more familiar with technological warfare. However, no matter how he compresses the space, some particularly powerful weapons are difficult to install on the Mark Armor. Energy is also a problem. Although there is a reactor, it can be seen from the famous scene in which a Thunder Armor is charged several hundred percent. Although the reactor is said to have unlimited energy, it seems embarrassing that its maximum energy limit is not It is extremely high, and generally there is no problem. However, when using some high-energy weapons, such as the weapon used by Thor to charge the armor in Avengers: Endgame, the reactor alone is estimated to take several minutes to charge. This is also the limitation of small reactors. In fact, compared to Batman next door, the technical content of his armor is not as high as Tony's, but its combat effectiveness is stronger. The main reason is that Batman's own combat effectiveness is very strong. The armor only enhances his attributes. The author can definitely make some energy blades and some armors for close combat.

It looks good but why is the rating so low? [What] The author will update soon! [Learned] Come on [like]

I think it's okay. This kind of subject matter is interesting to read, but boring to read in detail. I really want a Viana.

Very good, a very good book!

A well-written novel. A very interesting novel.

Good-looking, good-looking, good-looking

Although the previous article is particularly toxic, it is good-looking.