Livestream: From the Start, I Tear Into a History Professor

First of all, based on the story of this book, the protagonist and the two professors who confront each other at the beginning have the same nature. One is to seize a point to blacken and the other to wash. Author, have you ever known Cao Cao? Do you know how many evil deeds, bad policies, and evil things Cao Cao has done? Hero? Loyal minister? Heh, you just criticized Cao Cao one-sidedly and then let it go? All the comments that convinced the protagonist regarded Cao Cao as a loyal minister in troubled times and a hero who worried about national affairs. He killed relatives, friends, old friends, killed the queen and the second prince, not a word was mentioned. The point of view the protagonist gave me was ** and hypocritical. The protagonist's mission is to reveal the historical truth. Don't you think it's ridiculous, the author, to call it a one-sided expose? He can't even be objective. He praises the things he likes crazily. He ignores the main points and generalizes the things he doesn't like. It's funny.

Is Cao Cao a true hero? *Fart! If you say he is a traitor, I will not refute you. You have seen a hero who kills others when he is suspicious. Then the hero in your mind is really cheap.

I feel like Luo Guanzhong either hates Cao Cao or likes Liu Bei's three brothers, Zhuge Liang, etc. I don't have your wife and daughter to support him at all.

Talking about historical masterpieces, what kind of mindless nonsense did you write off-site? Is it embarrassing to write it??

Don't mislead others. The Empty City Strategy is one of the thirty-six strategies. Not only Zhuge Liang has used it in history, anyone with some intelligence knows that anyone who writes novels like yours needs to know a little bit about it. And you can even write the most basic things wrong, haha.

In the comments section, some of the big guys have different opinions on the historical viewpoints written in the book. To this I want to say, don't dwell on this issue anymore, please just read it as a story. Just treat it as a parallel world. Some of the comments really made me angry. In addition, this book is not about eunuchs, so please feel free to read it. Comparison

When you write this kind of novel, are you a little more neutral? As you said, Cao Cao is a hero? Why don't you say ** or something like that? Let's just talk about Kong Rong. He didn't do anything and was killed on a random charge. Is this what a hero does? Even if you say "annihilate the heroes", no one will say anything, and there is also the Ming Dynasty. If the Ming Dynasty refuses to give in, it is indeed the emperor who guards the country and the king dies in the country. But it cannot be denied that most of the emperors in the Ming Dynasty were weird. This is a fact! Even if you write a novel, you must at least have a neutral attitude. If you praise one and belittle the other, do you want the protagonist to talk about history in this way?

About Jianzhi No. 1'S book "Live Broadcast: An Angry Revenge Against the History Professor at the Beginning" Chapter 12: The Soul of the Ancestral Dragon is Dead and Qin is Still Here!! Chapter review.

About Jianzhi No. 1'S book "Live Broadcast: Beginning with an Angry Revenge against the History Professor" Chapter 6: Get double rewards! (Kneel down and beg to evaluate the flowers) Chapter review.

I read the book reviews, but I haven't read the book yet. I said that I won't even take a look at a book with less than 100 pictures. In Feilu, this is a dead end. The eunuch made by Feilu is so touching that readers dare not read it easily. When there are few chapters, readers don't read the author and miss the eunuch, so this is a complete dead end. With 100 pictures, it is destined**