Great Tang: After the Imperial Exams, Li Er Sets His Sights on Me

I like history, and I am also a fastidious person. If there is anything wrong in my writing, please give me some advice and corrections. Regarding the introduction of the history of the Tang Dynasty, there are Old Tang Book, New Tang Book, Zizhi Tongjian, Cefu Yuangui, Tang Liudian, Tang Huiyao, Zhenguan Zhengyi and many other historical materials. Please comment based on history and make your words meaningful. Thank you.

That's the attitude towards other countries. Stop giving away our country's core technologies for free.

Well, whether you can pass the imperial examination during the Zhenguan period is not decided by Li Er, but by the family.

In fact, Buddhism and Taoism developed together, and there is essentially no difference (Buddhism has been sinicized, and Taoism has absorbed a lot of Buddhist content). Both are useful, but the lack of taxation and lack of state control are obviously not detrimental to social development, unless it develops into Christianity or Arabia, which is based on religion.

Buddhism is a high-end beggar's nest and they don't have anything to do with production.

Does Li Er have the courage to reform? You see, when he was in power, he not only used his own strength to gain merit in foreign wars, but also changed his domestic reforms without changing the medicine. Power was still concentrated in the hands of powerful families. The power to select officials under the imperial examination system was still in the hands of the clans. They did not dare to equalize the land among the families, and they did not dare to touch the population hidden by the clans. He did not dare to execute a rebel in the eldest son's family, which showed that the imperial power was very weak.

In fact, Buddhist ideas also have many merits, but as they gradually develop, Buddhists have problems, such as the so-called putting down the butcher's knife and becoming a Buddha on the spot, and housing criminals who commit murder and arson. This is very problematic. For example, monks cannot marry and have children, which is also very problematic for the development of society. Another example is that they occupy a lot of land but do not pay taxes to the country. Therefore, Buddhism has advantages and disadvantages for the overall development of society, but the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. This is my personal opinion. Don't criticize if you don't like it.

Deduction 1 is the Shenhao system Deduction 2 is a traversal system Deduction 3 is a god-level technology system Deduction 4 is a super death-seeking system Deduction 5 is to transform the world system Deduction 6 is the evil god system Deduction 7 means the system becomes stronger the more you die. Deducting 8 is a salted fish system Kou9 is an evolutionary system that started from some small animals and insects It's free to try it, what if it's true?

Buddhist teachings are good, but the problem lies with people

Buddhism has its own role. As a ruler, Buddhism depicts a beautiful future world for the people at the bottom. If you are born with hardship, just wait for the next life. In this life, you can just be a cow or a horse. Modern Hinduism actually has similar functions to Buddhism. As expected, they both come from the same place. This is good for the rulers and helps to maintain the rule. All dynasties have promoted Buddha, unless he crosses the red line and accumulates strength to rebel. This has led to the destruction of Buddha several times.