
Great Tang: From the Start, I Join the Emperor's Chat Group
大唐:开局加入皇帝聊天群
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 825k Words
- Genre
- Military & History
- Subgenre
- Time Travel
- Updated
- 5y ago
- Source
- Faloo
Synopsis
All-time: Reads, Flowers.
565Chapters
8.5MReads
24kFlowers
10.0Score
More by this author
Readers also read
I’m Coming Clean: This Is the Emperor’s Chat Group
Great Tang: I Choose to Become a Female General from the Start
I Am the Three Kingdoms' Greatest Strategist!
Great Qin: Qin Shi Huang Has Only a Hundred Days to Live from the Start
Sui and Tang: Choose the Peerless Prince Who Stands Shoulder to Shoulder with the Emperor from the Start
The 141 Task Force Is Here! Quick, Get the Nuclear Weapons!
Reader comments 50
Translated by Google Translate

You may not believe it, but the real prosperity of the Tang Dynasty was during the period of Wu Zetian.
Compared with Hu Hai, the so-called prodigal son Mao of the second generation ancestor is not even considered. The sixth generation of Da Qin Fen unified the world and conquered all the great kingdoms Hu Hai lost in three years.
Is Li Shimin a famous emperor through the ages? I'm a mud horse. Why don't you say that Li Shimin gave technology to Japan, also called Japan, and then Japan defeated the Tang Dynasty and Ming Dynasty?
I'm just curious, Li Shimin and Zhu Di don't know the deeds of Qin Shihuang and Cao Cao? Why do they all look like they don't know each other? You said Qin Shihuang didn't know the subsequent emperors. I can understand it. After all, Qin Shihuang was the first emperor, but the subsequent emperors didn't know Qin Shihuang? Zhu Di still doesn't know that Lao Cao's house was stolen?
He is also a history professor, and I think he is only at the level of civil science... I think there is something wrong with just commenting on Liu Bei. Anyone who has read a series of histories of the Three Kingdoms will not give Liu Bei a hypocritical evaluation. In such a splendid era of the Three Kingdoms, only the three families of Cao, Sun and Liu were left. Do you think everyone can stand out in troubled times? Can you get ahead by being hypocritical? Can you establish the Shu Han without any ability? Laugh.
Got the author! Quick! Pull the rope on the 1st floor, boil water in the pot on the 2nd floor, prepare firewood on the 3rd floor, salt, oil, sauce and vinegar behind the 4th floor, hey, why are you taking off your pants on the 5th floor? This cannot be done! No day! The 6th floor stopped the 5th floor, and the 7th floor called up to the 8th floor to carry the author together! Careful! It bites, it bites! 9Th Floor, come and shut his mouth. The 10th floor has set up the tables, chairs, bowls and chopsticks, and when the 11th floor is finished working in the kitchen, the 12th floor will help the 11th floor kill the author. Floor 13, hey, floor 13, why are you cutting the author's rope? Hello! Stop it! The author ran away! The author was let go from the 13th floor! Floor 14, Floor 15, Floor 16, quickly catch the traitor on the 13th floor. Go to the 1718th floor to author you. You two bring the seller over and hold him down! I ask you to let him go! I ask you to let him go! I'll slap you to death! Tell me honestly, why did you let the author go? What? You slept with the author! Did you hear it on the 5th floor? The author already has someone! Well! Fifth floor, why did you take off your pants again?
Doesn't the emperor behind know about the emperor in front?? Zhu Di of the Ming Dynasty should know the lives of the previous emperors.
Zhu Di didn't know Tang Taizong Li Shimin, and Li Shimin didn't know Liu Bang and Xiang Yu. Emperor Qin and Emperor Wu of Han - the ancestors of Tang and Song Dynasties. The Song Dynasty does not know the Tang Dynasty, the Han Dynasty does not know the Qin Dynasty!
Author, please explain clearly that the Ming Dynasty did not understand the history of Qin, Han, Three Kingdoms, and Tang. This is how serious the cultural gap is to understand their history.
The author describes the characters very realistically, and each character has distinct characteristics →silliness. . . . . . . .