
Honghuang: Starting by Slaying a Tyrant
洪荒:从诛杀暴君开始
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 534k Words
- Genre
- Fantasy
- Subgenre
- Otherworld Continent
- Updated
- 7y ago
- Source
- Faloo
Synopsis
All-time: Reads, Flowers.
226Chapters
2.1MReads
299Flowers
10.0Score
More by this author
Readers also read
Reader comments 50
Translated by Google Translate








Are all the people in the Qing Dynasty saintly and wise? I'm afraid you're going to laugh me to death. I don't look at the Qing Dynasty as a son of the Han family, but as an outsider. Kangxi, the most famous and most accomplished figure in the Qing Dynasty, Yongzheng and Qianlong combined are not as good as the political uncles. The only thing worth mentioning about the Manchu Qing Dynasty is the large land area. There is really nothing else worth mentioning. Is the author from the Manchu Qing Dynasty? Still can't kneel down? Or have you watched too many TV series? Most of the TV series are about whitewashing the Qing Dynasty and discrediting the Qin Dynasty. They are bah bah bah fun.
Idiot, write blindly. King Zhou was a wise king, but he was deceived. Brother Zheng is definitely a wise man, and 90% of the time he is exhausted from working. Burning books was not thorough enough, otherwise China would not have been poisoned by Confucianism for two thousand years. In the Sui Dynasty, Yang Guang had a vision, but the family members were holding him back. Li Shimin was useless and sent a bunch of technical talents to Turpan without explanation. He was put on a pillar of shame and sentenced to death without explanation.
Forget about other things, the First Emperor is the only emperor throughout the ages. I asked how many emperors can do this without killing a single hero? Burning books and entrapping Confucians is just killing some magicians and some Confucianists who deceived the public. It's just that the First Emperor did not rely on Confucianism to govern the country, so he was later hacked. Moreover, Qin's laws can be said to be the most perfect in ancient times. It's just that the nobles of the six countries couldn't stand it, so they only started to talk about Qin's violence after they raised armies.
Qin Shihuang, you call others tyrants? Those who burned books and ensnared Confucians were all alchemists. Even before the Tang Dynasty, there was no such thing as burning books and enslaving Confucians.
In fact, instead of writing this, the author, you might as well write about the war between RMB and Yuan Datou. After all, Yuan Datou was the orthodox at the beginning, right??? And how much inheritance did China lose during the ten-year Cultural Revolution??? I think this is a tyrant compared to Brother Zheng.
Is Qin Shihuang considered a tyrant? Go check the information and read the history books yourself!
I don't know about other things, but why are you so slandering my brother Zheng? I'm afraid you want to die. No one in China's five thousand years of history dares to slander my eternal emperor Zheng. Brother Zheng does want to become an immortal and immortal, but that's for the sake of the people. Even if my brother Zheng is terminally ill, who dares to oppose him openly as long as he doesn't die?? Who dares to rebel against the inheritance passed down by so many talented people from hundreds of schools of thought for so many years??
Are you qualified to be like Qin Shihuang? Is the Cixi old witch your ancestor? Beast
I don't know about the Xia Dynasty, but the following are all promising kings.
I wanted to laugh a little when I read the introduction, and I wanted to laugh again when I read the book review, but I didn't. Then I couldn't help but laugh when I read the content. Nuwa, brother, are you still in the prehistoric times? A saint was imprisoned by an emperor who only had luck. I guess it's the emperor Daluo (the most), huh. . . Our emperor is so awesome (no slander intended), really