Detective Conan: The Great Detective's Ghost System

In fact, to be honest, I don't think Director Ochiai is a good person. I think no matter how artworks are compared, they can't be compared to a person's life.

Director Ochiai is indeed not a good person. What the boss did was at most a breach of trust and a crime that did not lead to death. He killed someone without surrendering and framed others. If he surrendered and was responsible enough, he would not be considered a good person. The honest doctor is not a good person either. He just avenged his family. I cannot say that he is bad, but he is not a good person either. I can only say that it is a pity.

After reading the introduction, I didn't want to read what the author's views were. Director Ochiai made it clear that the ownership of the artworks belongs to the owner, and the owner has no power to deal with his own things. If he doesn't open the museum, he will be killed. Other people's bosses can also be other people's husbands and fathers of children. There are children of my own parents and there are a lot of people who rely on the boss to support their families. Just for this reason, the author kills people and I really can't stand it.

People need justice, but they don't need crimes in the name of justice; people need order, but they don't need a ruling that overrides order. The only thing that can maintain justice and order is the law. No one is qualified to go beyond the law. Otherwise, it would be the greatest sin!

With all due respect, author, do you have any opinion on the law? Poor people must be hateful, whether they are honest or Director Ochiai, before they kill people, they are just poor people, but after they kill people, the first thing that comes to anyone's mind when mentioning them is that they are murderers, no matter how pitiful they are and how pathetic they were in the past.

Can you say that your hard work can transform yourself into a moral saint with peace of mind? How crooked are the three views?

Curator Luohe is not a good person, he is just a lunatic.

Regardless of the three views, the detective finds the criminal and the procuratorate makes the verdict. This is not normal! There is no emotion in the investigation process. If you think there are extenuating circumstances, you can find a lawyer to reduce his sentence. It doesn't mean that you think he is a good person and he will not go to jail if he kills someone! If everyone is like this, why do we need laws? Life is priceless, just like Director Ochiai in Conan, I laughed. If you say that there is this clause in the contract of selling and not modifying, you can definitely sue him. They are all adults. If someone fails to fulfill their verbal agreement, you will kill someone. What kind of logic is this? In business intrigues, if I cheat and lose, I blame you for being inferior to others. You have to admit it. It's not like children fighting.

It is said that revenge for killing one's father is irreconcilable. Honesty's whole family was killed. Revenge is necessary and it would be wrong not to take revenge. But regarding Director Ochiai, someone bought it with real money. Doesn't he have the right to dispose of the things he bought? When someone buys it, not to mention renovating the restaurant, it is also his right to renovate the toilets, because this will kill people, which is not a good person and a pity.

Ah, there is something wrong with the author's three views, right? I'm afraid a person like the author is a person! Killing someone, no matter what the reason, is a violation of the law, and you will be awaiting legal sanctions. Where does the reason come from? Unless the person was killed by someone other than himself, the author should treat the person like this