Three Kingdoms: Ghost Strategist and Imperial Tutor, Teaching Liu Bei to Seize Jingzhou First

I just want to ask, can the protagonist, from a humble family like this, really be brought into the core layer under Liu Bei?

There is no golden finger again, you are really obsessed, and you are crossing the river in white clothes. You don't really think that someone likes the Soochow rats, do you? Lu Meng was almost scolded for doing this.

The protagonist is indeed from a poor family, this character is established! How many times has the protagonist made clever calculations to help Liu, but Liu is still doubting, doubting, shocked, thanking, doubting again, shocked again, thanking again, the endless loop! He still had to ask all the questions, and after asking, he started to do things, but he was still doubtful. Zhang also had no respect at all and was always dissatisfied. It would be better for the protagonist to disappear for a year and see! It would be different if Zhuge Liang was in this position.

It made me laugh so hard. What did Liu Bei use to fight Jingzhou at the beginning?? Jingzhou belongs to aristocratic families. He must have thought too much about what Liu Bei can do to others in Jingzhou.

Le, the Three Kingdoms starts with Jingzhou? Are you kidding me? At the beginning of the Three Kingdoms period, when Liu Biao was in his prime, Jingzhou was the most difficult to conquer. Wouldn't anyone really be smart enough to think that Liu Biao, the leader of the Eight Horsemen of Jing and Xiang, was a waste? When he became the shepherd of Jingzhou, he rode into Jingzhou alone. He had no power at all, but he was able to secure his position as the lord of Jingzhou. Moreover, when he was in power, he could be said to be impregnable. Jiangdong could not even defeat Jiangxia. Everyone knew how much Jiangdong wanted Jingzhou, but even if thousands of people attacked Jiangdong's Sun Even when he was old and seriously ill and indecisive, no one from the Jingzhou family dared to jump around. Once he died, the entire Jingzhou state immediately collapsed. Maybe he was not aggressive enough, but he was one of the best in the entire Three Kingdoms in terms of defense. In the early stage of the Three Kingdoms, he captured Liu Biao's Jingzhou? Your ability is enough to defeat Yuan Shao, Cao Cao, and Sun Ce.

Can the author not always write about battles to reflect the protagonist's resourcefulness? It feels a bit boring. Can the author write about the development of people's livelihood after the city is conquered, recuperation, statistics of how many soldiers, horses, food* and so on? Don't go over it in one stroke, making people feel that after fighting one after another, the world was conquered in two years.

I didn't even read the content, but I knew as soon as I saw the title that there was something wrong with this book from the very beginning. It is indeed a good idea to persuade Liu Bei to invade Xuzhou and take Jingzhou, but this is not your original idea. It has been verified in history. When Chen ** was working under Liu Bei, he advised Liu Bei "not to march eastward to capture Xuzhou" because he would be flanked by Yuan Shu and Lu Bu, who wanted him to go south to Jingzhou, but Liu Bei did not listen. At that time, Liu Bei was the shepherd of Yuzhou, and Chen ** was his assistant and chief adviser. Liu Bei used Chen ** so highly and did not listen to his advice. So why does the author think that Liu Bei will listen to the protagonist's advice?

Why are they all like Water Margin, with all the big news happening in the blink of an eye? You let most of the thirty-six strategies go to waste. Suspicious soldiers, empty camps, and making money are all useless.

I want to say, isn't there anyone who can't create? When the People's Republic of China was first founded, many people also said that there was nothing at that time, so they could fight America with nothing. In the end, facts spoke louder than words. We always have to bring it into that time, that time, that time, and the author is not allowed to create conditions for co-authoring, and the author is not allowed to adapt? If it were written about Cao Cao, it would be reasonable to fight at that time. It would be unreasonable to write about Liu Bei. Just like many foreign worshipers nowadays, it is reasonable for a single person to kill a division in a foreign movie, but it is false and empty in a domestic movie to have a single person kill a dozen people alone. To what extent is this a double standard? According to me, everything depends on that time, and nothing is allowed to change. Why don't you watch Mao? It's better to watch Romance of the Three Kingdoms or Romance of the Three Kingdoms. That's when it was authentic.

Did you get a puncture in your brain? The cavalry used crossbows? Laughing like crazy!