
You Asked Me to Explain the Law and Judge Cases, So Why Am I Exorcising the Living on Livestream?
让你普法审案,你直播超度活人?
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 680k Words
- Genre
- Urban Romance
- Subgenre
- Urban Life
- Updated
- 2y ago
- Source
- Faloo
Synopsis
All-time: Reads, Flowers.
339Chapters
5.6MReads
8.3kFlowers
9.7Score
More by this author
Taking Stock of the Harem of the Protagonists of Chinese Comics and the Field of Shura in the Heavens
Genshin Impact: Only I Have a Beautiful Escort Team!
I, the Younger Brother of Sha Ruijin, the King of Handong Behind the Scenes!
Navigation: in the Beginning, the Childhood Robin Destroys the Navy!
Super God: Play as the Holy Lord, Starting with Liang Bing!
People Are in the Chat Group, Taking Stock of the Top Ten Virtues of Jianghu
The Book Girl's Video Begins with Seven Villain Sisters!
Genshin Impact Short Video, Arecino Becomes a Maid at the Beginning
If You Are Asked to Be a Reporter, Are You Selling Fire and Arms?
I Am a Game Power Leveler, How Can I Clear the S3 Season?
Start as Sikong Zhen, I Am the Hero Himself!
If I Ask You to Open an Internet Cafe, Will You Earn First-Class Achievements Every Day?
Readers also read
Livestream Challenge: Are You Really Building Shanhe University?
Showbiz: Sure, I’ve Been Washed Up, but I’ve Never Been Broke
Forensic Doctor: I Love Dissection, and Hannibal Is My Idol
Hong Kong Films: My Cousin Guanzai Sen Was Killed, So I Went on a Rampage
Honkai: Star Rail: I Am the Aeon of Hope, and I Join the Chat
Sincerity Is the Ultimate Killer Move: I'm Taking the Internet by Storm
Reader comments 50
Translated by Google Translate
Are courts that lax? Is a murderer sentenced like that? It is not necessary for the public security organs to supplement the investigation, find the murder weapon, search for evidence, and then file a public prosecution at the prosecutor's office. This is the procedure. The author does not understand anything.
Rape by a man does not constitute the crime of rape, but it does constitute the crime of obscenity, injury and insult. As long as you change the crime to something else, it will be fine. Why do you have to write a crime of rape?
To be honest, Chapter 109 is very problematic. This plot could not have been written. It is easy for people to think that the author is planning to write multiple female protagonists. To be honest, in urban novels, you are a rich man, a gangster or a mercenary. If you open a harem, no one will care about you, because your identity represents you. The moral character of a character does not need to be that high, but if he is a civil servant, a judge, or a police officer, with this kind of public status, readers will have very high requirements for the moral character of the protagonist, especially not knowing the law and breaking the law, especially having a harem, whether it is illegal or moral. The influence will affect the view of the protagonist. This view has always been there. Whether accidentally or intentionally, it will affect this book. After all, for a judicial officer to open a harem, this is not breaking the law knowingly. Even if it is not illegal, as long as it is discovered, it is morally still There are problems, especially the discussions among netizens and the final Internet violence. Some things cannot be hidden for a lifetime. They will be exposed one day. As long as you don't do such things, they will not be exposed and there will be no loopholes. Some things may be wrong if you do them, but as long as you don't do them, they will not be wrong.
It's far worse than others of the same type. You don't have to be rigorous about any subject matter, but you can't popularize the law.
To be honest, this is the first time I have seen in a Feilu novel that a girlfriend breaks up after less than thirty chapters. No wonder a new female character is being paved. I thought it was a harem before, but it turned out not to be a harem. To be honest, you might as well not write the plot of a girlfriend. So, what is the good point of having a girlfriend, especially since the protagonist now relies on the system and can be regarded as a super human in the future and can live forever. He is not from the same place and can be said to be a person in two worlds.
The first case, the case of "Lv beat a car thief" tried by the judge, was about the car thief asking for compensation from the car thief, Lv. Then the plaintiff should be the car thief and the defendant Lv. The author could not tell the plaintiff and defendant, so he wrote it backwards. If the car thief was charged with stealing the battery, then the plaintiff would be the prosecutor and the car thief would be the defendant. This case has nothing to do with Lv. These are two independent cases and should be tried separately and issued separate results. In addition, it remains to be discussed whether Lv's beating is consistent with being an act of righteousness. He subjectively hit someone because he hated the thief, not to stop the thief from stealing the car. Moreover, his reason was known to the presiding judge.
There is something in Chapter 73 that I can't understand. What does it mean that the evidence in some cases is not enough and requires a judge to conduct an on-site inspection to find out the truth? Isn't it the job of the police to investigate evidence of criminal crimes? The judge must personally do the investigation and collection of evidence, so why do we need the police?
The name in the introduction is different from the name in the book
I don't understand: Isn't the municipal court an intermediate court? Why did it become superlative in the book???
The interaction between the prosecutor heroine and the protagonist is quite sweet, but she has an affair with a woman and has no desire to continue watching. The protagonist, a judge, intervenes in other people's feelings with justice and compassion. With Neptune's ability and the woman's attitude towards Neptune, it is obvious that she cannot be the heroine.