In the Marvel Universe, I Go to Hogwarts to Learn Magic

How can Harry Potter's combat power survive in American comics?

In fact, despite everyone complaining about the economic problems of wizards, Gringotts is connected with the economy of ordinary people, so what about capital, and the biology of goblins who are as intelligent as wizards? In the plot, the wizard economy is always based on magic metal. There is no shortage of food and energy wizards. It is difficult to carry out large-scale primitive accumulation of capital in a monopoly manner. What is the prerequisite for capital to become popular? You must have the resources that others are pursuing to harvest the value of others. This resource is extraordinary in HP and cannot be grown in the ground. It can only be created by wizards. So I can create it and you can create this resource. Why do you have to be exploited by me for nothing? I personally feel that the model of wizard society should be an academic monopoly model. Ancient families and elite wizards set up patents in the form of knowledge monopoly to obtain large amounts of funds, hoard large amounts of gold galleons, and then control the entire trading market. Wizards' pursuits are different from ordinary people. The existence of the replication spell and the traceless extension spell means that there is no competition for survival resources at all. So we might as well imagine that in an extraordinary society where everyone has enough food and clothing, and the material desires are satisfied, what is left for wizards to pursue? It's nothing more than stronger magic and longer life. So under our existing capitalist framework, can any capital operation model that uses survival resources to exploit human value be applied to the wizarding society?

The most important thing is that not being aggressive is rare in this fat road, but it is a bit poisonous for book friends here. There is no system, just a little cheat, and the protagonist's abilities are all explored by himself, which seems a bit boundless. Moreover, there is no female protagonist in the article about the idea of ​​raising children, and it feels like the author came from outside.

Merlin's beard, large intestine, small intestine, cecum, nose hair, iron eggs, belly... What else hhh

Harry Potter's magic is all at your will

Harry Potter's magic is still very useful in Women's Federation 1 and 2. It may not be as good as the gems later on, but the Deathly Hallows is not bad. At least the hp system of the movie version is still OK.

I really don't know, so many people in time travel always like to lick the original protagonist. Very, if it is the kind that is really awesome and can take you flying, it doesn't matter if you lick it. You don't have any cheats, but if you have a cheat, then lick a chicken feather. It's okay if you don't kill him. Besides, Harry Potter has a useless purpose. He is also a waste. He was not taken flying by others. If you lick him, it will be normal for him to block his shield or be chewed to death by a big melon.

It was interesting at first, but I kept talking and analyzing it, and I didn't even know if I was watching a fanfic or a simulation of Five Years of Magic and Three Years. It's getting more and more serious, and sometimes there's even no plot in the entire chapter, which is all based on modern scientific analysis of magic. Are you squatting like crazy in Tieba to open a book?

Is there no distinction between author li and lie? Didn't you graduate from elementary school? Dumbledore is written as Dumbledore, why don't you write it as Dumbledore?

The plot is so written that I can't understand what the main character is going to do, it's a mess.