Scamming the Young Sword Master From the Start

Why would I even bother with a harem anime? 😫😨 That's not how it's written in Marxist philosophy at all!! Love is not an abstract spiritual infatuation, nor is it an emotional detachment from reality. Rather, it is a practical relationship under specific historical conditions—an essential connection formed between people in the process of material production and social interaction, possessing objective necessity, and certainly not a random outburst of subjective imagination! 😤😤😤 You must first prove the practical nature of love: it is not a one-way projection of consciousness onto reality, but a two-way construction of "intersubjectivity"—your feelings cannot remain at the level of thought; they must be transformed into concrete actions to change the objective reality of "our relationship," through care on a material level, empathy on a spiritual level, and responsibility on a practical level, to complete the dialectical leap of "cognition-practice-re-cognition-re-practice." 🤓 You must use the method of contradiction analysis to deconstruct the inherent logic of love: you must acknowledge the unity of opposites between "individual independence" and "relationship as a whole," while also demonstrating that you can seek "harmonious unity" within "differences and contradictions"—not erasing my uniqueness, nor dissolving your subjectivity, but resolving the contradictions through joint practice to form a "dialectical unity" where 1+1>2. You must prove that our contradictions are "non-antagonistic contradictions," capable of achieving dynamic equilibrium through communication and tolerance, rather than leading to antagonistic conflict and division. You must demonstrate the historicity and development of love: love is not a static "established state," but a "collection of processes" that is constantly enriched with the development of practice. You must prove that your love is not a sentimental impulse that remains at the "initial stage," but can continuously discard old forms and develop new content in the dimension of time, with our shared experiences and changes in the social environment—rising from "sensory knowledge" to "rational knowledge," from "physical attraction" to "spiritual resonance," and from "personal love" to "sharing the responsibility of social relationships." You must disprove "abstract love" and "selfish love": using historical materialism, you must demonstrate that true love is necessarily rooted in the fundamental pursuit of "the free and all-round development of human beings." It opposes the instrumentalization and objectification of people—you cannot treat me as an "object" to satisfy your own emotional needs, but must acknowledge that I am an "actual subject" equal to you. Your love must serve the free development of both of us, not your unilateral possession. You must prove that your love is not an extension of the "logic of capitalism" (treating emotions as bargaining chips), but a micro-prelude to the relationship of a communist "association of free individuals"—based on the essence of equality, mutual assistance, and sharing. It lacks the rigorous analysis of dialectical materialism, the realistic foundation of historical materialism, and the practical support of a theory of practice! It is neither dialectical, nor objective, nor realistic! I do not accept it.

This new book is probably the one about the delusional girlfriend Alicia on the bestseller list; mentioning that will result in its permanent ban.

The section on rescuing Cangcheng is far too brief. How was the protagonist's special status discovered? What preparations did Cangcheng make beforehand for the battle against Luo Hou? Logistics, army, organizational structure, strategic arrangements, and any contingency plans? Was the protagonist's statement a prophecy from the Last King, a joke by Aha, or an arrangement by Fuli? How did the protagonist go to Luo Hou and how did he return? How did Di Gong Siming detect Luo Hou? What was Cangcheng's reaction when he observed Di Gong Siming's light arrow? How were the already made strategic deployments withdrawn? What were the interactions with other immortal ships? ... It's all too brief, practically as bland as drinking water.

The author later deleted the separate chapter explanation. Cuttlefish's comment was quite accurate: if a web novel reaches the point where the author has to issue a separate chapter explanation, it's a failure, even though he himself ended up doing the same. The plot is fine; Hedgehog Cat is very impatient these days. I've seen several authors whose books collapsed because readers were impatient, complained about the slow pace, and arbitrarily changed the outline.

Not bad. The beginning is much better than those books that always try to pull off a big plot twist. I can trust the writing style. Let's see how the story unfolds. However, the writing style... Seems a bit old-fashioned. The book feels new, but the author doesn't. Let's observe further. #(You know what I mean)

Readers, use your box power against this kind of author!

The rumor that Wang Shu is a Mirror Flow fertility expert is actually quite credible if you don't know about the chat group. Why is he so compatible with reproduction? Why is he considered a saint of procreation? Why was his era so late? Why does he like the Big and Small Mirror Streams so much? (Because he's a fan of...) Why does he care about Daikyo's meals? Why does he possess swordsmanship talent surpassing that of the Mirror School? Why does he also enjoy showing off his sword skills and become obsessed with sword practice? Why is he so devoted to the Immortal Boat yet so unfamiliar with the Immortal Boat life of the immortal race? Why is he both righteous and kind? His name is Wang Shu, which means "moon" or "moonlight" (as mentioned by a fellow reader). There is only one answer. He is the son of the Ōkyō school. Jingyuan: Really, can't we bring them? Could you give us a few more?

Could we have a past-future crossover? With big and small mirrors gushing out! I can't resist ordering them all! #(Hehehe)

Don't get too obsessed with Ellie's book, it's less than 600,000 words.

I was wondering why that other book, "Aili," had such similar writing style. They even deleted my comment when I mentioned it. Turns out, this one was also abandoned! #(Vomit)