
Fa Qing: Starting from the Time When the Prince Became a Bandit
About This Novel
In the 17th year of Chongzhen's reign, Emperor Chongzhen was hanged on a coal mountain. Wu Sangui led Qing soldiers into the pass, and Zhu Cixiang, the prince of the East Palace, escaped. Dorgon was ambitious and aspired to conquer the Central Plains; Li Zicheng lay dormant and licked his wounds and made a comeback; Zhu Yousong took advantage of the chaos to ascend the throne and steal artifacts; Zhang Xianzhong started a business in Shu and was ready to go; Ming Dynasty was facing the chaos of the five-party conquest, and Zhu Cixiang had only one goal: to defeat the Qing, defeat the Qing, and then defeat the Qing.
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(5)Scraped 21d ago
I'm about to give up the book and keep reading. It's sixth on the overall list. The pursuit of equality and unified taxation is not bad, but is it too naive to implement it at this time? Guess how much there is too much resistance. Look at the case of tax arrears in Jiangnan, the Manchu Qing Dynasty. How many people were killed with such intensity that even the merits were exempted, and it was not completely solved. Your edict is like a success?
Started to brag about the Francois again, dozens of people destroyed an empire, just kidding. A few hundred people broke up a large tribal alliance with smallpox. Before the gun in the back hall appeared. Thick cotton armor alone would disgust the Spaniards to death. The Ming army also had vehicle formations and trenches, plus cotton armor. The archers alone were enough for them to drink a pot, and even Gu Er was killed by the heavy cavalry. Those white scum soldiers who came to the Far East came to the battlefield in the Central Plains just to deliver food. And there are no splashes, only artillery has something to offer.
There is a problem with your thinking. You take the status of the prince too seriously. If you lose Beijing, you have to start over. With the status of the prince, some people are willing to invest and some are not. It's that simple. You have to rely on yourself to build the foundation.
Three stars, I really like the saying that a great scholar will debate the scriptures for me~
Hurry up Hurry up Hurry up Hurry up Hurry up Hurry up Updates
Rating
Community(0)
Official(5)Scraped 21d ago
I'm about to give up the book and keep reading. It's sixth on the overall list. The pursuit of equality and unified taxation is not bad, but is it too naive to implement it at this time? Guess how much there is too much resistance. Look at the case of tax arrears in Jiangnan, the Manchu Qing Dynasty. How many people were killed with such intensity that even the merits were exempted, and it was not completely solved. Your edict is like a success?
Started to brag about the Francois again, dozens of people destroyed an empire, just kidding. A few hundred people broke up a large tribal alliance with smallpox. Before the gun in the back hall appeared. Thick cotton armor alone would disgust the Spaniards to death. The Ming army also had vehicle formations and trenches, plus cotton armor. The archers alone were enough for them to drink a pot, and even Gu Er was killed by the heavy cavalry. Those white scum soldiers who came to the Far East came to the battlefield in the Central Plains just to deliver food. And there are no splashes, only artillery has something to offer.
There is a problem with your thinking. You take the status of the prince too seriously. If you lose Beijing, you have to start over. With the status of the prince, some people are willing to invest and some are not. It's that simple. You have to rely on yourself to build the foundation.
Three stars, I really like the saying that a great scholar will debate the scriptures for me~
Hurry up Hurry up Hurry up Hurry up Hurry up Hurry up Updates









