A Sharp Review of the Sixteen Emperors of the Ming Dynasty, Lao Zhu Broke His Guard!

Write the true side of Zhu Yuanzhang. There are still bragging in the comment area. Take a serious look at history. Before I read history, I thought Zhu Yuanzhang was good. After reading it, forget it. He is a white-eyed wolf. He is not good for the people and officials. His son can kill innocent people indiscriminately. Officials cannot be greedy and their wages are low. To put it bluntly, Zhu Yuanzhang does not hate Yuan people, but hates that he is not Yuan people.

I don't know who benefits from stigmatizing Yu Qian and praising Zhu Qizhen. Our history since elementary school has written that Yu Qian is a national hero, and there is also talk about the Ming Dynasty. Not so many people watch TV these days. I learned about the name Tianzi from Mingyue back then. Anyway, every emperor has some praises and some scolds. From Emperor Xinjifa to Emperor Qin, Han, Wu, Tang and Song Dynasties, no matter whether he praises or scolds, there are a lot of historical materials. I am just an ordinary person. I have read quite a lot of books, but I can't tell clearly. But what you wrote about Yu Qian is almost becoming the most traitorous official in the world. Do you think it is appropriate?

Those who say conspiracy theories about the author, when did the author not write out all the historical data? I still don't believe there is any way to do it when all the historical materials are thrown at me. As for explaining and discrediting the Ming Dynasty, then you can show the history of the Ming Dynasty that can count. . Regardless of whether the Qing Dynasty smeared the Ming Dynasty or not, the author at least wrote based on historical records. As for the conspiracy theory part, when did you not mention it as a conspiracy theory in advance? I told you that this part has not been confirmed and has not been included in the evaluation of the emperor. So if you think you should believe it, you can believe it or not. It can also be said that the author is drunk when he is messing around.

The author outputs his own opinions throughout the text, including excerpted history. The thing about this guy is that he always excerpts historical materials without contextual reference. Coupled with his point of view, it feels right. Divide one thing into nine paragraphs, and each time you say one paragraph, each paragraph is correct, and the result will change. Moreover, the author looks at history in a static way and does not consider the situation at that time. He looks at historical figures as NPCs and does not consider the importance of people's hearts at all. For example: "Yu Qian can only prevent the southward migration, and there are still people in the imperial capital." Ask the author, if Yu Qian does not stop the southward migration, who will be the leader to defend the city? Also, if you, as a low-level non-commissioned officer, would defend the city well when all your superiors ran away?

Use something new, immediate, small-scale, niche, and personal favorite to write the system! For example: Why do martial arts fan fiction now generally use the terms acquired, innate, master, heavenly beings, and land gods to describe realms? Do you think the authors don't know that real battles involve poisoning, traps, intrigues, etc., In multiple dimensions? No no no! Everyone understands and understands it! It's just for the sake of clarity, concreteness, and conciseness, to express the content and facilitate writing, that's all! As for the [Post-Xianzong Tianxian] system, after many years of development, it has gradually been used more and more in martial arts novels and fan fiction, and has gradually become a highly universal system. . . Let's talk about the [Top-Top-Ren-Shangren-NPC-Pull] in this book. This evaluation system only became popular in a small area in September 2025! Anyone who often surfs the Internet knows that there is a "thing" that suddenly becomes popular, too sudden, too short-lived, and too much. For example, at the beginning of this year, dry steaming in the catering industry suddenly became popular on several short video platforms, but it disappeared after only half a year! In the same way, I don't have too many expectations about the future of the [Punch-Pull] system (I don't think it will become popular in the online literary world). . . In terms of writing and reading comprehension, do you think it is easier to understand [super-top-advanced-intermediate-beginner], or [ram-top-renshangren-NPC-pull], which is more straightforward, simpler and easier to understand? Hehe. The author simply slaps himself in the face at the beginning and screens out readers. There is no niche system. If I start the book with [Fengjie-General-OK-Weishui-Wudetao], except for Guangdong and Guangxi, who will not be able to understand it without saying a few words? ! . . . In short, this is just my personal opinion. Every time I read reviews about this book, I feel embarrassed. [Tamp] It's okay, [Pull]? At first I thought it meant pull👦. . . Vomit. . .

I can't stand it anymore. I've given up on conspiracy theories every day. Now I'm still bragging about Pig Town. I gave up.

Expelling the Tartars and restoring China now only deserves to be rated as finished. There is really nothing left to talk about. Even if we can go to high school for two days, it won't be like this.

This book was created following two directions. 1: Most of the "Twenty-Four Histories" are false, and most of the so-called actual records are also false. But if most of history is false, then I won't read it. That's metaphysics. If you don't read, how can you understand history? On the other hand, if everything is believed to be true and every sentence in the book is regarded as a confirmed creed, that is historical idealism. The correct attitude is to use Marxist standpoints, viewpoints and methods to analyze and criticize it, and turn upside down history. Two: "History of the Ming Dynasty" made me the most angry. Except for the two illiterate emperors Ming Taizu and Ming Chengzu who did relatively well, and Ming Wuzong and Ming Yingzong who were slightly better, the rest of the Ming Dynasty were not good and all did bad things. -- Above.

There are many conspiracy theories written about, such as the first betrayal of the country by a civil servant, civil forts, such as the stories that Liu Daxia and the Japanese pirates had to tell during the Hongzhi Dynasty, such as Xie Qian had one hundred thousand acres of land under his name when he retired, and many wrote about the seizure of power, the loss of the right to speak, and various mysterious causes of the emperor's death. Don't always treat ancient people as modern people, otherwise it will feel like you are not giving sharp criticism to the ancients, but instead adding personal anger.

All kinds of violent arguments are made frequently, but they don't get to the point. Totally nothing to see.