Hunting Fairies and Demons

From three chapters to two chapters, and possibly one chapter, until it goes bankrupt, the book is finished.

I found that the protagonist likes to cause trouble, and the author deliberately wrote the plot of gang trafficking in order to find money for the protagonist. I want to say whether the protagonist is too lenient. When he first started practicing martial arts, did he feel invincible? Still an old author. This routine is very childish. Very childish. The protagonist offended so many people when he first entered the city. If the protagonist with some intelligence did this, at least the protagonist could run away, but the protagonist's parents would definitely die miserably. The worst way to die.

The protagonist is in a dangerous small village. In order to avoid the crisis, he decided to escape to the city with his parents, so he hunted near the village to make money. Decided to collect enough money to buy a house. There had been a crisis in the village before. The protagonist felt more and more that the village could no longer survive, so he decided to speed up his efforts to save money to buy a house. But there is a loophole in this. He can't afford a house, so he can rent a house in the city. He is really an idiot protagonist (the author). Do I have to buy a house when moving to the city? So awesome? So everyone in the city is a homeowner? ! This author feels tough and makes up for the plot, which makes my brain explode!

It shows that this is a masterpiece that has been conceived for a long time, and not a single character was written without any brains. The main character is extremely stupid. There are a lot of disgusting sandbox plots in it. I can't write about it without having cerebral thrombosis for 10 years.

A few honest farmers died and no one took care of them, but the three idlers who did not provide food for the protagonist were taken care of. The protagonist killed people and didn't take anything for fear of being held accountable. Isn't this a vendetta?

The logic above is a little unreasonable. I just killed three people yesterday, and no one would doubt me because I was weak in the past few months. The next day I came back carrying hundreds of kilograms of prey. He also talked about deterrence, but it depends on the situation. Originally, the protagonist's family was considered "strong" in the village, and it would not be better if their wealth was not exposed for a period of time. It's hard to understand the logic of writing like this now and not being able to read it thoroughly. Another flaw is that as mentioned before, they treat their parents as "parents" after being together for only one month. I know this kind of thing is difficult to write, but in fact, it can be described as a relative or something. Then describe it slowly, or just say that being a "parent" would be too abrupt. Very cheap. I just read the previous personal review.

Sherlock Holmes said that when the law cannot bring justice to the parties involved, private revenge is legitimate and even noble from this moment on.

The logic is too confusing, and it becomes more and more difficult to compile. As long as you make a brainless start, you are preparing a lot of brainless plots to complete it.

Lao Mu, taking the initiative to kill people and seize treasures is an act of banditry and banditry. It is a little Japanese style. Correct it immediately!

I've almost finished reading. There are only a few martial arts. Is it possible that in such a big world, there is no martial arts for cultivating the spirit? Moreover, martial arts is too simple.