
The Most Powerful Founder of Civilization in History
by Mu Wuwei
About This Novel
It's still a familiar plot, it's still a familiar formula, you start with a ship, and the auxiliary system is added at the same time, you sit and watch the destruction of the Western Zhou Dynasty, loot the princes, stop Guan Zhong, save Xiaobai, and watch the Spring and Autumn Period for hegemony. The system prompts: "The host is satisfied with the dual hegemony route, open the dual route, please pay attention to the host to check!" I just saved a character who was erased from the history books, what about the system? With a long life, I just want to be the founder behind the scenes. Alas, now I can only marry Bai Fumei, become the boss, and reach the pinnacle of power. . . .
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(8)Scraped 4d ago
All I can say is that there are so many trolls these days.
Again, I will delete the post if you say bad words. To read history, you must understand history. I am sorry for deleting that reply by mistake, but the so-called clan and emperor after death was something that only existed in the unified dynasty. The Western Zhou Dynasty could have a system of tribal chiefs, and the Emperor of Zhou was the leader of the alliance. However, historical data are missing. No matter online encyclopedias or general history, they are recorded according to the age of the king, and my dialogue questions use His Majesty, regardless of whether the emperor or the king is alive. They are all called like this, and I have never used the title You Wang. I have a good look at it. Even the princes are still called Junshang. Please clarify the relationship between narration and dialogue before commenting. Besides, I write books purely as a hobby, not as a profession. Otherwise, I will not refuse to sign the contract if it is almost 300,000 yuan. If I have good suggestions, I will improve it. Just like the cavalry article, if you copy all the history in the novel, I think you can read the General History or 24 Histories to read the novel. There is no need at all.
I give the author five stars, but I still have to complain. The construction of this book is a bit too out-of-the-box. It was dizzy when I read this and that. I thought I was reading several books together, but I couldn't stand it anymore. I was confused and confused.
Don't know about segmentation?
I always don't know how to divide it into sections. Each chapter seems like a big mess.
It's a bit like writing in vernacular, but overall it's pretty good.
Come on (ง ˙o˙)ว. . . .
come on! ! ! Well written, but there are typos
Come on! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
digress
Let me first state that I don't criticize the author, and I basically don't comment on any books. But in this book, I personally think that you are going off topic or repeating too much. I feel that the author is writing history rather than novels. Eight out of ten words are history and two words are novels. It is a bit disjointed. I am also a hardcore novel fan. I have read hundreds of chapters of this book by the author and I am still a little confused. The storyline jumps out too much. I write about other plots as I write, and then suddenly jumps back. The sense of flow is a bit missing. Of course, this is my personal opinion and I hope the author doesn't take it to heart. Overall, reading this novel was like climbing a floor. I was looking at the scenery on the top of the building and suddenly it made me go back to the first floor. After reading it, I was suddenly asked to go back to the top of the building to read it. In addition, the plot is too big but the logic of the story is too fixed. History accounts for 80%, and the plot of the protagonist is just incidental.
Looking forward to it
If you haven't read it yet, let's check in first!
The author of this book has something to say
As a newbie, I may not have time to check for typos, but I also have friends who help me slowly check them. Regarding punctuation, I may not have paid attention to it. Some people say that my writing is bad. Please write a popular novel first before commenting on others. If you can only say no Know how to do, as the saying goes, don't do to others what you don't want others to do to you. If you don't do it yourself, why should you tell others? If you don't like it, you don't have to read it, right? Internet novels are just a tool for daily entertainment. If this is true, then basically most books can be removed from the shelves, right?
Rating
Community(0)
Official(8)Scraped 4d ago
All I can say is that there are so many trolls these days.
Again, I will delete the post if you say bad words. To read history, you must understand history. I am sorry for deleting that reply by mistake, but the so-called clan and emperor after death was something that only existed in the unified dynasty. The Western Zhou Dynasty could have a system of tribal chiefs, and the Emperor of Zhou was the leader of the alliance. However, historical data are missing. No matter online encyclopedias or general history, they are recorded according to the age of the king, and my dialogue questions use His Majesty, regardless of whether the emperor or the king is alive. They are all called like this, and I have never used the title You Wang. I have a good look at it. Even the princes are still called Junshang. Please clarify the relationship between narration and dialogue before commenting. Besides, I write books purely as a hobby, not as a profession. Otherwise, I will not refuse to sign the contract if it is almost 300,000 yuan. If I have good suggestions, I will improve it. Just like the cavalry article, if you copy all the history in the novel, I think you can read the General History or 24 Histories to read the novel. There is no need at all.
I give the author five stars, but I still have to complain. The construction of this book is a bit too out-of-the-box. It was dizzy when I read this and that. I thought I was reading several books together, but I couldn't stand it anymore. I was confused and confused.
Don't know about segmentation?
I always don't know how to divide it into sections. Each chapter seems like a big mess.
It's a bit like writing in vernacular, but overall it's pretty good.
Come on (ง ˙o˙)ว. . . .
come on! ! ! Well written, but there are typos
Come on! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
digress
Let me first state that I don't criticize the author, and I basically don't comment on any books. But in this book, I personally think that you are going off topic or repeating too much. I feel that the author is writing history rather than novels. Eight out of ten words are history and two words are novels. It is a bit disjointed. I am also a hardcore novel fan. I have read hundreds of chapters of this book by the author and I am still a little confused. The storyline jumps out too much. I write about other plots as I write, and then suddenly jumps back. The sense of flow is a bit missing. Of course, this is my personal opinion and I hope the author doesn't take it to heart. Overall, reading this novel was like climbing a floor. I was looking at the scenery on the top of the building and suddenly it made me go back to the first floor. After reading it, I was suddenly asked to go back to the top of the building to read it. In addition, the plot is too big but the logic of the story is too fixed. History accounts for 80%, and the plot of the protagonist is just incidental.
Looking forward to it
If you haven't read it yet, let's check in first!
The author of this book has something to say
As a newbie, I may not have time to check for typos, but I also have friends who help me slowly check them. Regarding punctuation, I may not have paid attention to it. Some people say that my writing is bad. Please write a popular novel first before commenting on others. If you can only say no Know how to do, as the saying goes, don't do to others what you don't want others to do to you. If you don't do it yourself, why should you tell others? If you don't like it, you don't have to read it, right? Internet novels are just a tool for daily entertainment. If this is true, then basically most books can be removed from the shelves, right?









