Rebirth of America, My Mentor is a Wizard

Even if you don't consider the logic problem, the chapter is already broken at the beginning. The novels created by the author draw comprehensive references and pay homage to Lao A. It can even be said that there is almost no author's own stuff. Even the Chinese and English names of the protagonist are references and tributes. The author most likely does not understand the actual situation of Prison A, and has not studied it at Western University. Of course, the same is true for the author. The difference is that this book was not written by me but by the author. If the author does not know anything and only uses Prison A's story as a benchmark, then the story will be distorted in the second retelling. Of course, there is no problem with distortion. The problem is that if it is distorted and some parts of the story are left blank, it will be difficult for the author to straighten it out and connect the previous and the next. So the author chose System + Extraordinary. The tasks issued by the system can connect the story, and the extraordinary can make up for some logical contradictions in the story, and to a certain extent reduce the need for deus ex machina due to death. This idea of ​​​​the author is the reason why the author classifies this book as inferior. It can't even meet the lower-middle standard of barely being able to watch. Because the problem with this idea is that people's vision and abilities are often related to each other. The protagonist breaks the limits of the human body in just a few chapters. What does this mean? The protagonist is the strongest person in that world, No.1. Can such a person's perspective be the same as that of Lao A? Prison A will be desperate, helpless, a little playful, a little bohemian. Because he knows that he can't change anything, he can't save the people of Xida, he can only tell the stories he saw. Someone will always remember, someone will remember, and someone will remember, that's all. But the protagonist has power. Although the protagonist in the early stage did not have the power to change the world, the protagonist broke the limits of the human body in less than a week. The protagonist should be confident, and the protagonist will not think that there are any difficulties that cannot be overcome. Speaking of which, let me mention mathematics by the way. Mathematics is not just a joke. Humans cannot be worse than AI. The AI ​​exam can reach the level of 985 middle school students. What the author means is that there are only so many types of mathematics, and it is much easier to answer one question type than to create one. Therefore, even people who have no aura at all can get ideas for at least all the question types they have answered by answering questions. The protagonist's intelligence level, or spirit, also breaks the limits of the human body, showing that he has the memory to break the limits of the human body. Such an extraordinary person cannot do mathematics. At the very least, mathematics at all stages from the frontier to the bottom, which does not involve the mathematics of land reclamation, will not be difficult for the protagonist. Moreover, in frontier land reclamation, there are lucky ways as well as the stupidest and slowest way. It does not mean that frontier land reclamation can only rely on luck to produce a genius and then carry the world forward. There may be such people, but basically in most cases, technological progress does not rely on such exaggerated geniuses. But a method. A way to move forward steadily. The author's writing style is also too immature, and he has committed the problem of enclosing his own cuteness. Is the novel written for the author himself or for the readers? How many readers have read Prison A in detail? Are there many people who watch Prison A occasionally? Are there many people who have heard of Prison A? Or are there many people who have never even heard of Prison A? The author believes that there are more and more information as it goes on, and the author's processing of a lot of information will be incomprehensible to those who have not watched Prison A in detail, or who have not listened to the live broadcasts of those programs. The author keeps saying, ah, Xida is finished, ah, Xida is hell, ah, Xida's rituals and music have collapsed. Why does the protagonist or the author think that Western University is going to be doomed? Why do you think Western University is hell? People who have listened to those programs at least have an answer in mind that A gave. But what about people who haven't heard of it? The author accidentally mastered a technique, meditation. I believe in the power of belief. The author pretended to forget the relevant memories, or suppressed them a little to imitate the perspective of someone who does not understand. I simply cannot understand what the author is talking about, because there are too many possibilities, and the author did not converge on these possible situations. The story told by Prisoner A was restrained, and Prisoner A did not say anything such as [Go back and think about it] [Think about it yourself] [Is this right? Think about it? , Lao A gave an accurate answer, Lao A dared to make a judgment. The author subconsciously shirks the blame. The author does not dare to make this judgment, which will lead to the fact that the answer is not the only one. Because the person who asked the question did not give a standard answer, then if there are two sets of answers that can be justified and logically consistent, even if the two sets of answers conflict with each other, but because the author has not made a final conclusion, then these two answers cannot at least tell who is wrong or who has the problem. The problem with the author is that the author fails to take on the reader's perspective. This book isn't even about people, it's about a broadcast of a sporting event. For example, when playing football, the audience cannot see the picture, but the broadcaster can see it and then broadcast it through language. To write a story, you need to write your own story, to understand it thoroughly, and to take other people's stories and integrate them into your own story, rather than just parroting other people's stories. This novel is really, even difficult to criticize, because criticism is to criticize the novel itself for not meeting expectations and not meeting the standards of a novel. Just like a great chef would not criticize a teenager for sharing the housework, a great painter would not criticize a child's graffiti. As for this novel, it is difficult to call it a novel. It is not a question of what is wrong with it. If a person makes braised pork and finally makes pot-roasted pork, and can talk about the problems, this book is equivalent to making a bicycle. Let alone braised pork, it's not even food. This novel is not so much a [novel] as it is a [Prison A Story Club Selection]. That would be fine if it was truly a pure selection. The author is also like Xin San in checking for duplicates, so he has to have some ingenuity of his own, and then the same problems as Xin San will appear. What the author mentioned above are only objective issues. As for the subjective aspect, this book is very popular at first glance. It has nothing of its own except for popular memes. The author is the first book of Level 1. From a subjective point of view, firstly, the author has nothing of his own, and it will fall apart when the hot memes are gone. Secondly, the author is ready to cut it at any time.

I asked why I couldn't find the copy of Don Quixote after searching for a long time. It turned out that it was taken off the shelves a few days ago.

Why do I remember that the Don Quixote book also had this routine?

Are there any fans of Lao A here? Brother? Ah?

It's only 60,000 yuan and there's a limited exemption. There are no books that have been exempted recently.

Yes, it blends the real world of Western University with the wizarding world. It is very interesting and worth reading!

After reading a, look at this again to consolidate the knowledge points

Interesting, but what does all that corruption mean? I can only roughly understand

Just because of the name of the author, I want to use my temporary membership to prostitute you for free.

I wonder if no one is following this book. Why is it recommended every day and the recommendation position is used like this?