
Lol: Interviewing Professional Players Starting from S3
About This Novel
The year of S3: Uzi failed in the World Championship for the first time... Faker won his first world championship... The shy left LCK and moved to LPL, looking for opportunities to debut... JKL is still just a small anchor... ... Xia Jie traveled to S3 and interviewed professional players as a host. It was originally just a small live broadcast, but it unexpectedly became a huge success...
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(1)Scraped 6d ago
If you reveal some future content, the butterfly effect will inevitably be triggered. If the result of the game changes, the faker's trophy you receive may also suddenly change. However, this is not the most serious. You will find that the one who should have won loses, and the timeline will completely interfere with the event line. If you plan to follow a completely unchanged timeline and avoid timeline interference, I would like to know what your settings are in this regard. For example, at important event line nodes, players will be involved in the event line. Your memory will be sealed, and the memory will be unfrozen when the event line overlaps with the original event line. Although the players may be dissatisfied, this can avoid the interference of the butterfly effect on the actual ongoing world line. They will understand if they think about it. Time travel is outrageous enough and multiple memory interferences are nothing. However, I think the author intends to use this solution to gain the favor of the players and establish connections. There is nothing wrong with it. But is this foreshadowing to have the opportunity to explain the ongoing LOL game? Are you planning to keep up with current events and intersperse some past-tense interviews with players? But there's another question. On the premise that they already know you, they suddenly have a memory of you interviewing them in Season S? They will definitely pay attention to your live broadcast room and what the mentality of people who have not been interviewed by you will be. Generally speaking, I support it. I am mainly curious about how the author wants to fill in the holes or simply leave it to readers to fill in the holes. After all, people will still believe in what they come up with, but I still hope to solve these problems. After all, there are not many books about this type of LOL. It is considered a novel genre (?-Ω-`). After all, there are really not many books about LOL from this perspective. Come on, author?(????)
Rating
Community(0)
Official(1)Scraped 6d ago
If you reveal some future content, the butterfly effect will inevitably be triggered. If the result of the game changes, the faker's trophy you receive may also suddenly change. However, this is not the most serious. You will find that the one who should have won loses, and the timeline will completely interfere with the event line. If you plan to follow a completely unchanged timeline and avoid timeline interference, I would like to know what your settings are in this regard. For example, at important event line nodes, players will be involved in the event line. Your memory will be sealed, and the memory will be unfrozen when the event line overlaps with the original event line. Although the players may be dissatisfied, this can avoid the interference of the butterfly effect on the actual ongoing world line. They will understand if they think about it. Time travel is outrageous enough and multiple memory interferences are nothing. However, I think the author intends to use this solution to gain the favor of the players and establish connections. There is nothing wrong with it. But is this foreshadowing to have the opportunity to explain the ongoing LOL game? Are you planning to keep up with current events and intersperse some past-tense interviews with players? But there's another question. On the premise that they already know you, they suddenly have a memory of you interviewing them in Season S? They will definitely pay attention to your live broadcast room and what the mentality of people who have not been interviewed by you will be. Generally speaking, I support it. I am mainly curious about how the author wants to fill in the holes or simply leave it to readers to fill in the holes. After all, people will still believe in what they come up with, but I still hope to solve these problems. After all, there are not many books about this type of LOL. It is considered a novel genre (?-Ω-`). After all, there are really not many books about LOL from this perspective. Come on, author?(????)









