This is Not a Group of Kings Who Have Subjugated Their Country

The Human Emperor - Emperor Xin, was the first ruler in Chinese history to carry out major reforms. During his reign, the people lived and worked in peace and contentment, the country's power grew day by day, and he had the courage to expand territory! Later, Emperor Xin's great reforms touched the interests of the nobles. Later, he took advantage of the imperial master's eastward expedition and openly rebelled against him for three ridiculous reasons! After successfully usurping the throne, he openly smeared the black Emperor Xin and imposed the title of King Zhou, causing Emperor Xin to be reviled by the world for thousands of years. During this period, a white-washing faction headed by Yan Hui appeared to rectify Emperor Xin's name, but the effect was not good... Lutai self-immolation, this is the last face of this eternal holy emperor... By the way, the second ruler to carry out major reforms is also the last ruler of China to carry out major reforms. He is - Zulong Yingzheng! If Emperor Xin's reform is successful, then Emperor Xin will be as famous as Zulong! An eternal holy emperor, an eternal emperor...

Wearing courier clothes at a class reunion, and in the end it was the class monitor who pretended to be cool, pretending to be a pig and eating the tiger, it was so disgusting, I asked him to quit

1-Is Emperor Yang Guang of Sui Dynasty a tyrant? This is actually easy to answer, yes or no, why, because history itself is an ambiguous subject, and you cannot rely on the only information to evaluate the ancients. Let's talk about him again. Remember, he is a monarch, not a sage. The monarch represents absolute rights, with legislative power, life and death rights, including not being restricted by the law. In fact, to be honest, I don't agree with the author's idea. It is too ideal. I think if you lose, you lose. There is nothing necessary to say. Why did the Sui Dynasty fall? Everyone knows that building the Grand Canal and conquering Goguryeo were too big a step, which would naturally cause a backlash. This was extremely costly to the country. Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty did not expect that it would cause such a large rebel force. The soldiers were already exhausted when they conquered Goguryeo. Even if they were wearing heavy armor and spears, they had no power to fight back. In fact, to be honest, I only care about the results. Regardless of the process, if you fail, you have failed. What is there to say? The emperor of a country is so childish, and there is no one else. Why did he conquer Goguryeo? They scolded you a few times, but you returned it with your fists and beat him half disabled. You still expect him to be grateful to you. It is too childish. He also recruited a large number of militiamen and the death toll was countless. It is too ridiculous. But he built the Grand Canal (which cost countless people and money) and established the imperial examination system (in fact, most of them were modified based on his father's work). (To be honest, Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty was not a wise king, but he was not a tyrant either. He directly skipped the emperor's corrections without going through primitive accumulation. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty could reform, but he could not. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty had three generations of wise kings. But he only lasted one generation, and his nature was different, so there is no comparison. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty had real power, money and military strength, but Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty had very little money and wanted to build the Grand Canal. How to build it? He asked the people for manpower. He had a strong family. Come to recruit troops or help me move mountains to cultivate Taoism. People can conquer the Xiongnu, but Emperor Yang of Sui can't. Why? Can you conquer a country far in the east with such a small amount of money? It must be said that Emperor Yang of Sui is quite powerful? , The authorities have actually stabilized. If it is not enough, it will be of no use. If you need to bomb it, you have to bomb it. When the few troops are used up like this, it will collapse, which means that the army will be defeated. No matter how hard you try, it will not help.)

Another book I read today is very similar to this one, except that the emperors in the book are not the same, and even the way of describing them is similar. The other book described Li Shimin as "the crime is eternal, but the crime is contemporary." However, in this book, the author describes Yang Guang as "the crime is in the present time, but the crime is in the future". Even the description techniques, the subjects taken by the protagonist, and the content of just joining the group are all similar, they are all a test. After commenting on the shortcomings of one emperor, another emperor who disliked him rewarded him. I am really confused, as the two books were not written by the same person. How come they are so similar? Here is a picture for your reference.

Didn't you say that there is 1 million in the mobile phone? (There is also payment information). Can't you see the information after so many days? Furthermore, when Yang Guang sent out a calligraphy, wouldn't he think about why someone would send calligraphy and painting after receiving the red envelope? (What's more, didn't the system prompt: Yang Guang painted a calligraphy and painting?) (I saw Chapter 19, which means that it must have been at least 3 days, right? It's time to discover these things, right?)

Ming Dynasty may not be perfect, but it is definitely not that bad.

The author contains personal information, has too deep personal emotions, and maliciously slanders the Ming Dynasty.

Okay, as a bookworm for ten years, this book is considered a good book. The only flaw is the description of the real world, which is too pretentious. Nowadays people like to pretend to be dark. But overall it's still very good, and the author's writing skills are also good. I hope there won't be any eunuchs. 😘😘

Unlimited extreme smearing of the Ming Dynasty, the sun will set, people will age and die, let alone one dynasty, he actually used the decline of the Ming Dynasty in the last years to criticize and smear the entire Ming Dynasty, and the derogation is useless. It seems that every dynasty can decline, but the Ming Dynasty cannot, and if it declines, the entire Ming Dynasty is garbage and incompetent. Through comparison, the Qing Dynasty is infinitely elevated. I don't know what the author is thinking, deceiving primary school students to hate the Ming Dynasty.

This book does not distinguish between priorities and keeps describing these emperors. The main character is totally the old man.