Daming: I Screened the Documentary in Hongwu

Was Zhu Yuanzhang still that stubborn in the early years of Hongwu? Human thinking changes according to the environment, and today's thoughts are somewhat different from tomorrow's thoughts. Zhu Yuanzhang was not a deaf person in his later period, he was just disappointed. He respected young people very much, especially young people who were not contaminated. He would listen to your suggestions and reasons, and he would not lose his temper. He was not as cruel as the legend says. He treats people with more brains than anyone else, and he will get angry if he feels that he is being tricked. Learn about him personally from history. He was very eloquent, good at speeches and good at learning. In Chinese history, his eloquence was the best among emperors, and he was very good at confusing people. Zhu Yuanzhang's strengths are 100% not mentioned in time-travel novels, and all of them are written about his shortcomings. History also says little or nothing about his strengths. For example, if a person is knowledgeable and simple, he will listen to his heart. If he is an honest person, he will be considerate. This means that Zhu Yuanzhang is a person with high emotional intelligence and good eloquence, but his shortcoming is that he was born low and is also a big argumenter. If you speak with too much logic and lack of reason, and what you say is different from what you do, then he will look at you through colored glasses and then argue with you. In other words, he doesn't trust you anymore. You have to know that he often argued with his generals about strategy and tactics during the war. What was his argument about? It's about developing thinking. Why can't it be done when he becomes the emperor? Queen Ma was arguing with him and Zhu Biao was arguing with him. They were gone and there was no one to argue with him. There is nothing wrong with Li Shanchang and Hu Weiyong. Because they did things, Lao Zhu put colored glasses on them. Even the Prime Minister looked at them through colored glasses. To sum up, he is a resourceful and decisive person. What do you mean? Everyone is more scheming, suspicious, and judgmental? It means he is very confident. Being eloquent means being able to argue. Being eloquent proves that he is a person with high EQ or IQ. Being argumentative means that others do not understand him and he is lonely. He is good at giving speeches, which proves that he understands human nature very well. His eloquence combined with speech means that he is a good at convincing people, and he is also a well-rounded person. He can speak a few words about people and ghosts. Such a person is a powerful figure even in modern times. Is it possible for a person who is not open-minded to be like this? His biggest shortcoming is his birth, which is also his biggest strength. The shortcoming is that his thinking is partly based on bottom-level logic. People at the bottom are upright, and if you are not upright to them, they will also be upright to you. The reason why he does not trust civil servants is that civil servants are too fickle. They say one thing and do another, and their words are different from their actions. This is how he treats civil servants. Being good at learning puts him in his own position, one up and down. Sometimes he is thinking from the bottom and sometimes he is thinking from the top. There is no anchor.

The author uses modern people's thinking to measure feudal emperors! Lao Zhu, Lao Zhu, why did you die without knowing? Your modern boss, if you dare to call me Lao Li, Lao Li or whatever, I will make you miserable and walk around in circles. The feudal emperor wants to kill your nine tribes.

How should I put it? It is true that we lacked technology in ancient times compared to later generations, but it was not particularly lacking. If you have this skill, teach them. It is political performance that will get you promoted. No one else can object if Lao Zhu gives you a reward. But, but, what we lack most is actually the general political direction and the general direction for the future. If a five-year plan is drawn up every five years at a great meeting, it would be much better than this. There is also the improvement of the tribute system, as well as the dialectical renewal of concepts and where to expand. These are the most important. But the author obviously doesn't quite understand this.

I recently read a novel on 🍅, which is a historical novel. Many of the author's interpretations are different from others. When explaining the Ming Dynasty, he didn't say much, just a few points. However, he mentioned Zhu Yunwen's incident. According to the author's guess, Zhu Di must have changed history, because it doesn't make sense that Zhu Yuanzhang was so focused on rules. How could a person pass the throne to his concubine Zhu Yunwen? According to the author's analysis, the identities of Zhu Xiongying and Zhu Yunwen were changed by Zhu Di, and he also gave several evidences. First, Zhu Xiongying's name did not use the word "Yun". He is the eldest son. Those who say that Zhu Yuanzhang was named Zhu Xiongying because he had not yet typed are probably wrong because Zhu Yuanzhang had already started naming his sons according to the word "wood" when naming them. This shows that Zhu Yuanzhang had the idea of ​​taking a name very early. Secondly, Zhu Yunwen took back the title of King of Wu as soon as he was born, because King of Wu was made by Zhu Yuanzhang. The title before the emperor, thirdly, those who speculated that the Lu family was the victim of Zhu Xiongying and the Chang family are even more false. They said that Zhu Yuanzhang and Zhu Biao did not understand, but Queen Ma had given birth to several children, how could she not understand the birth of children? Also, the Lu family basically had no sense of existence before and after Zhu Yunwen became emperor. Fourthly, after Zhu Yunwen became emperor, he conferred the title of King of Wu on Zhu Yunxi.

Even if you do well, you are still an unstable factor and will be fucked to death sooner or later.

Give the author a video. The [3D Topographic Map Series] of station b talks about the grassland phase one, BV1WUnFz3EGD. It's really intuitive. The war on the grasslands in the early Ming Dynasty, compared to the Han and Tang Dynasties, seemed to have no strategic planning at all, and no one knew where to fight. It looked like a strong man with high myopia fighting a thin man.

Won't you write a single chapter? The author is great

Please update it soon. The author seems to like it.

Turn off the anti-theft, I want to see it, thank you😶

Zhu Yuanzhang is not interested in the modern future at all?