Although Invincible, the Style of Painting is Wrong

The first three are pretty disgusting. The Iron Man part was okay. But I felt quite speechless during the Spider-Man part. In order to fight against Spider-Man, criminals chose to purchase a large amount of heavy firepower. Will cause greater damage. It will also rot the police system. So we ditch Spider-Man. (Defying logic.) Is it not a cost for criminals to purchase heavy firepower? , What a criminal could do alone could now be done by a group of people, and the target of robbery has changed from ordinary civilians to the upper class. The incidence of crime has been greatly reduced, and casualties have been reduced. The only drawback was that it threatened the upper class, and then it was gone. Isn't this great? The author wants to say that the existence of superheroes will make the police system rot. But is this really a state department? I'm pretty capable of breaking down, but if I can't do it, the police system will rot as it changes with the times. Isn't it time to restructure the police system? And only how many people can a criminal kill. Except for a few people, most people are willing to put their heads in their belts? The protagonist's explanation of Spider-Man's explanation was arrogant. I don't know what to say. The logic is why he only beats you and not others. The protagonist talks about social problems, not people's problems. If social problems are not solved, crime cannot be solved. This is not much better, it is much more effective, and it still insists on talking about something that is not there. Iron Man vents his anger. People just want to use common people to establish their authority. Just send weapons to his opponent directly. Wouldn't the problem of terrorist organizations be solved? If some people die first, not many will die later. Otherwise, what else can we do? To reduce civilian casualties. As for the people who died, they were all soldiers on the battlefield. What does it have to do with civilians? Even more cruel, prepare protective measures yourself and send biological and chemical weapons to both sides. Force them into peace negotiations. The protagonist is really speechless.

To be honest, this is the first time I have made a statement. This book made me feel very disgusted with love for the first time. The view of love in this novel is very embarrassing and very classic. If you die, what use will I have in this world? The plot of this novel is better than the Chinese language and the character of the protagonist. However, the protagonist is very overwhelmed and embarrassed emotionally, especially in love. The protagonist of this book is really too powerful and has the ability to destroy civilization. He is also a weird spiritual type and can easily lose control. Most weird protagonists should not have love, especially in a normal world view, so Because their love will change from normal protection to various extremes such as possessiveness, yandere, and destructiveness. It is a very uncertain thing. Although normal love is also uncertain, love is still easy to control because of the limitations of the carrier, which is also the limitation of human beings. The protagonist is different. He has evolved into an evil god. Can his love be normal?

The beginning of the article is about poisoning. The author's theory is the same logic as "If you didn't hit me, why should you help me?" It sounds 30% reasonable, but it really lacks 97% of virtue.

The rebuttals in the first three chapters give people the feeling of rebuttals for the sake of rebuttal, without considering the actual situation at all.

Even a 10-year-old bookworm couldn't stand those remarks at the beginning. After scrolling through the comment section, it turned out that the public was very discerning. They were all negative reviews. To be honest, it's quite unbelievable to be able to do this. In the end, those who have never eaten shit can give it a try.

Most American high school students are not stupid enough to understand your tirade, not to mention their faces slightly changed after listening to it. Most likely, they saw an Asian who just transferred to another school contradicting them, and they got angry and wanted to beat you up.

It's been 25 years since I was poisoned by the beginning. How come there are still authors writing about the guilt of good people? Does it mean that if Spider-Man is gone, there will be no super human crimes? Hasn't the police system always been a joke in Marvel? The main character's preaching speech is so disgusting

The protagonist's character is really bad. He doesn't react at all unless his bottom line is trampled into the mud. I see the shadow of Lu Mingfei in him, but he is even more unforgivable than Lu Mingfei. Lu Mengfei was deliberately cultivated to be like this, but he knows he has power, but he has always been submissive and like a mouse. It's really disgusting.

What's the difference between the protagonist and the person who said, "You didn't hit him, so why do you have to help him?" Especially later on, when the protagonist encounters something, he still thinks of Spider-Man. He wants both and needs it. Why are you so awesome? Isn't the author just such a person?

I think you are a god, so forget about your incorrect views at the beginning. In order to get the ability activated, there is no problem in saying some nonsense or disgusting things. I really couldn't stand it anymore. The reason is that you can see other people's book reviews, but the author didn't read it at all. What do you emphasize by opening and closing your mouth? This is ordinary people. It is because of this ordinary feeling that it makes people feel so comfortable. Oh, I fall in love with it. Gods and ordinary people have a lot to complain about and a lot to scold. Forget it, gross. I regret voting monthly.