Entertainment: I Really Want to Make Progress

What does it mean for the author to create his own character for the protagonist? They say career comes first, but what's the result? Let Liu Yifei play "My Love from the Star"? Can Chun Chun slap yourself in the face? I know you borrowed from the fatter one, but what does it matter? We readers only want good works, so I will read both books. They are really the number one in career! You and I can accept it if you let Gao Yuanyuan play the star, but Liu Yifei is really inappropriate. You can even accept it if you let her mother play the role! Readers are not blind. I know very well what you thought about when you asked Liu Yifei to act!

First, it's unclear where the protagonist's abilities come from, whether it's time travel or rebirth. A parallel space suddenly appears in front of him. It's so embarrassing to watch, and the setting is confusing. Secondly, the nature of dog licking is too serious, especially pussy licking. There are many female protagonists who can take the pussy. When it comes to hard licking for a long time, it looks very disgusting. There are other lickings that can be said to be fun if you lick them occasionally. If you lick them all the time, it is very disgusting. Third, pretending to be 13 is too serious. If there are multiple female protagonists, please be more relaxed. If you have a single female protagonist, don't write so many supporting roles and use so much pen and ink to exaggerate them. Some of them are worthy and established. Fourth, the saints are serious and have constant nanny attributes. Those in the dormitory feel disgusting and unprincipled. Fifth, business has seriously degraded the intelligence. It knows that future generations are in the spotlight, but it just doesn't make money. For example, the house prices in Kyoto are low, but they don't buy it even if they know it will rise. The forced slow development of the plot is particularly disgusting. There is also the alternative dog-licking attribute of business profit-making. I feel like a fool, the kind who works for nothing and doesn't pay for it, which is even more disgusting to watch. After reading the above five poisons, I don't know why I have the courage to write this, it's just poisonous and watery stuff.

The TV series I filmed was exclusively given to another video platform for free, and the male protagonist was only one of the shareholders of the platform. He did what no fool would do. When you make a movie, your share is about 50%, and then the male protagonist's salary is not included. Don't talk about the salary being converted into investment. Why should the salary be converted into investment for a movie that is guaranteed to make money? Isn't this a fool? I would have known that the male protagonist's salary would already start at 60 million by this time. If the remuneration is 0, then investing money to account for the share would not only be stupid, but also stupid. The male protagonist is already a capital, and he is the only actor and director in the domestic entertainment industry. Two Hollywood movies are also huge hits. Movies that are sure to make money are given shares everywhere. Forget it, give it to China Film, Shanghai Film, Enlight, and Emperor. You can get about 40% of the share. Are you as stupid as the moon? I am embarrassed to say that I am a human being if I don't have more than 65% of it, like 🐶?

This book is actually Chow Yun-fat's licking dog! Why did Chow Yun-fat get more money in Hollywood? In the movie Let the Bullets Fly, the protagonist himself wrote a letter inviting Zhou to participate in the film, and also thanked him for lowering the salary, which was 40 million for the film. I'm really vomiting. In reality, his market price for this movie dropped all the way after filming The Golden Jacket, and it became a box office poison again. The movie is a movie with King's main investment, and the salary is 10 million.

The author has a lot of poisonous points when it comes to business writing, not to mention variety shows. Everyone who has read this book says it is poisonous. Also, giving the copyright to Bilibili for free is actually just a shareholder. When making a movie, my company is the controlling party and gives away even half of the share. Have you always been able to afford the investment in super large-scale productions? For distribution of theater chain resources, just have China Film Group. If you want more theater chain support, add Wanda. If other companies want to participate in the investment, they can enter the market at a premium or use other resource replacements. The author did not write about it. It is completely an image of being taken advantage of.

Is this protagonist a time traveler? It's too messy. One moment the plot is written to make him not look like a time traveler, and the next moment it's written about a future that only time travelers know. There are too many bugs.

The protagonist's salary is over 60 million, but it costs 100 million to make a movie? This movie is not a sole proprietorship. The male protagonist will have a maximum share of 50%. What about the other people's remuneration? Special effects also cost tens of millions. This 100 million cost means the male protagonist gets zero pay? Isn't that a fool? If you jointly create a joint venture with someone else, Bilibili, and authorize your TV series to be watched by Bilibili for free to the audience, then the authorization is also free? A TV series can cost around 100 million in copyright fees. How stupid can someone do such a thing?

It is a well-written entertainment article. Both the writing style and the plot of the characters are of a very high standard. It is more realistic and has an online IQ. It seems to be more exciting and less exciting, but it does not involve all the action, so it suffers a lot!

2009 was the first year Liu Tianxian entered Hollywood. He signed a contract with the second largest management company in the United States. Both his mother and himself wanted to be an international superstar, so you jumped directly into the Hong Kong circle. . Liu then reconciled with Huayi for the 500 million box office book "The Book of Youth". . . How many women have you got and you still kneel down and lick them? The most important thing is that in 2009, did you know that Liu could not make TV series? When the internet wasn't booming and you were burning money, making top-notch TV series was just skipping movies and going back to TV series, which meant you were a failure. Star, all those who read the novel of this drama, can Liu, who was 22 years old in 2009, have a flat face and a figure, be able to film it? This novel can collapse right now.

Is it a matter of Liu Tianxian's acting skills? She also went to act in a play, and it was even more embarrassing to hear that the protagonist was going to act in a play. She was signed to the second largest economic company in Hollywood and only stayed there for a year. In addition, her godfather's financial crisis broke out in 2010 and she was involved in the Hong Kong circle. Like Yang Mi, she was unable to receive film resources in the mainland and TV series were still looked down on. They were already top-notch. Later, it was mixed up in the Hong Kong scene and then favored by the media. Even if the Hong Kong scene declined from 2008 to 2012, if the box office of a big movie with movie resources could not exceed 100 million or 50 million, it would be no problem. You also mentioned that the movie Red Cliff did not lose money, but the Chinese side made less money. Red Cliff had a Japanese investment of 15 million US dollars, and it immediately became a box office hit in Japan. The Japanese market belongs to the Japanese film studio. There is also Good Voice. Even if you know the senior management, they will only produce two episodes for you at most. The TV station will definitely take back the rights and copyrights and give you a maximum of 20.30% Of the advertising fee. In China, if you look at the reality, there are several production and broadcasting separations. The TV stations were very strong 12 years ago. There are too many minor points. I suggest you, the author, check the information carefully. There is nothing wrong with the writing.