The Lost City

Since the author of this book came to comment on my book, I took a look at all four of the author's books. How to put it, maybe my personal experience is too shallow, maybe my knowledge is not enough. My personal feeling is that the author's writing still needs improvement... There is really still a lot of room for improvement... Let's talk about it in the author's own words. The author's work is really very jumpy like a movie. If Hollywood-style movies add jumps and suspense points, one is because of time constraints, and the other is to increase the flexibility of the plot, attract the audience, and allow them to speculate and discuss. To me, the author's book feels more like an autobiography, more oriented towards his own genre. If you are doing it just for fun, just because of interest, then it doesn't actually matter. But if it is for readers, it is not very friendly. (It means it is uncomfortable to read) As soon as I appeared on the scene, I was almost overwhelmed by the large number of settings and rapid jumps. I already knew who I was, where I was, and what I was doing. Maybe it was because the original writing style was too unfamiliar, maybe it was just a three-minute hit... But this Dungeon book seems quite friendly in terms of recent chapters, at least I can read it.

The writing is too blunt

I am also a writer, although it is a hobby, but I can understand the author's way of writing, that is, "This is the world I created. I can show it in my mind and bring myself into the characters, but I cannot describe it from a perfect third-person perspective. He may be a novice author like me, but the storyline is still very good. Please give it your full support."

Cheers to this book in 2018!

The author's writing is very good. It's really fun to watch during the battle. The protagonist is so handsome, but I just don't like this kind of writing... Ugh

Very cool writing

Since Brother Cunyi's book review area has been occupied by a large number of trolls, I will not post it individually under the chapter. These chapters feel better to me than the previous ones, but there is an obvious problem. How should I put it, it's still the old problem of "reading sense". When writing a book, you create a world that runs in your mind, and you describe the events and scenes in this world from a perspective (usually a third-person God's perspective). It can be said that the information you collect from this perspective is comprehensive and very rich. Although I don't agree that gorgeous words can solve all problems, I still have to use my experience. "This is a glass of wine" "It's a martini on the rocks." The author's description from God's perspective affects the reader's reading experience. In other words, when the reader makes up his or her mind, it is based on the author's words. Brother Cun Yi's chapters may be a little rushed, and there are some places that I don't understand well. Generally speaking, it is an old problem I mentioned before. This God's perspective is presented to the reader, not to the author. It should make the reader feel like they are watching a movie. The reader should feel the text and the smoothness of the plot. The character will not suddenly predict things without any basis (unless he is a prophet). Therefore, the reader must be reminded of relevant clues, and then the character in the story can give a reaction. This way the reader will not feel that this concept was given to him by you, but that he understood it himself, which is in line with common sense and convention. Although the sparrow is small, it has all the internal organs. There is no need for gorgeous words, but there must be a basic reading experience that makes readers feel friendly. Above.

Thanks for the big red envelope, come on

The writing is okay but I don't like the writing style.

Is it good to read the book? I support it greatly.