Wizard: Gou Adds Some Demon Hunting in the Steam Age

Author, I saw that you said you wanted to write well, so you should write well, but why did I see your introduction that you didn't have, humor, funny, nonsensical, and I saw the word "reasoning" in your introduction, which means that the protagonist should be smart, but why is the protagonist like a fool? No matter whether the author's IQ is equal to the protagonist's IQ, at least make the protagonist smart, okay? You said you write well, but you are so fucking messy, your book will be bad sooner or later. [Emot=default,38/]

It is obvious that the main character has an above-average IQ, neither a glass heart nor a virgin. It seems that there are many female characters, but there are not many bullshit things happening. The protagonist does not have to sacrifice his life for any woman. It's still possible to be a dog when it's time to be a dog. But why is this book not rated highly? When I saw the mid-term, I discovered a problem. Author, your perspective in writing the book is wrong. As I write, I put the protagonist aside and write about someone else. Maybe in your opinion, this adds to the epic feel of the event. The question is who cares? Who cares what the villain did? Who cares what the nobles did? Who cares what the supporting characters did to save the city? You want to make every character flesh and blood, and that's right. But can it be done from the protagonist's perspective? After writing so many chapters, I didn't even mention a word about the protagonist. So is this protagonist just a charlatan? No wonder I saw some people commenting that the protagonist is a waste. Obviously, the protagonist does everything well and within a reasonable range. But just like the protagonist, he didn't participate in anything, didn't know anything, was kept in the dark, and he wasn't the one who solved the problem in the end. If he is not a waste, who is a waste? This is not a question of the protagonist's ability, but a question of the author's perspective. Obviously the protagonist has a lot to write about, but he has to write these things into a group portrait. It's hard to remember the names of foreigners. When there are so many characters, even someone like me who specializes in memorizing names can't tell who is who. There are even some supporting characters or villains who haven't appeared in several pictures, but suddenly appear, and I forget which organization they belong to. To sum up, the author has too much heart, but does not have the writing skills to match. It's better to write about characters honestly. Writing about events is really not something you are good at.

It's this kind of plot again, I don't have any sense of expectation. It's probably because of the woman who then turned against the Church of Dawn and started fighting. Why does it feel like everyone is so interested in women? They commit suicide before they even have enough power to protect themselves, just like a fool.

If possible, I still hope that the protagonist of this kind of book can be smarter, not crazy, but stupid, and it is difficult to mix.

After reading more than 180 chapters, the most disgusting thing is that you are having a mental dialogue while typing. Why do you use inner dialogue to explain to the readers what you are writing? The dialogue is like an idiot, the more I read it, the more I feel sick to my stomach

How can I put it? The writing is good, and the story is also very good. The only thing that feels wrong is that the timeline of the story is a bit messed up. I've read a million words and the story took nearly a month. . . The continents in the story are very big, and the sea in between is also very big. This can be seen from the fact that it takes a year to travel from the Middle East to the South by boat. However, the supporting characters in the story may appear anywhere on the mainland within a day or two. . . This is very dramatic.

Why don't you follow the new ones?

This book by the author seems to have something to do with Deep Sea Embers.

This kind of protagonist really ruins the plot. Would a normal person have desire for a woman who has the intention to kill him?

The protagonist is just a puppet, and he has been practicing to make a joke.