Shadow Apostle

The character Monica has already appeared in Chapter 2, and it is clearly stated that she is Horst's friend, or at least a very close partner. Chapter 4 further strengthens the relationship between the two through Sven's mouth, saying that Horst can solve the bounty of the Ritual Blade in order to help Monica. The purpose of having this character appear so early is to pave the way for the plot in Chapter 28, so that this character does not seem to appear out of thin air and let everyone know that these two people are friends. Now the question is, something happened to a good friend, and Horst had the ability to save him, and then he went after getting the news. How can this be considered a licking of a feather? Why is it so controversial? Is it right not to save him at this time? That's not a stranger, that's a friend. Then, I was also confused about Mrs. K in Chapter 3536. My logic is very simple. Someone informed me that my friend was in danger through hints. I used this information to help and rescued the person. From a personal perspective, I must be grateful for the information. Otherwise my friend will die. As for the benefits the other party gets from me saving people, that is the other party's business and has nothing to do with me. From my point of view, if I used the other party's information to save my friend, then I should accept the other party's favor. Whether the other party uses this hint to rescue his subordinates or attack his colleagues, that is not an issue that I should consider. I will not take responsibility for it, but I am not qualified to be jealous of the benefits gained by the other party, and I should not deny that this news allowed me to save my friend just because the other party can get more benefits. I think this is a very smooth logic. Why is it so controversial? It's okay to say that the protagonist was deceived into going in to save people, and it's okay to feel aggrieved, but before I went in, in Chapter 29, it was clearly stated that the protagonist knew what was going on, but he really wanted to go in and help Monica, so it was an active acceptance and had nothing to do with being arranged. It's obviously a consensual business. What Mrs. K hinted at is not clear enough. Everyone clearly states the price and gets what they want. Why do so many people feel aggrieved that the protagonist has been arranged?

Many people find it difficult to accept being used by an old lady to save Monica, and I also find it quite strange. Because in my world view, this is a matter of course. As mentioned before, Monica is a friend, a good friend, and she even strengthened the relationship between the two with Lena's words at the door, saying why it wasn't Monica who handcuffed her back this time. Now someone is hinting to me that my friend is going to die. I was able to help, so of course I went to save my friend. Let's not talk about going out of our way to protect your friends. Human lives are at stake. What kind of friend is it if you can help or not? Shouldn't I do this? Should I say I don't care unless you give me money? According to normal logic, it is impossible to say such things. That is my friend, not the other party's friend, that is just the other party's subordinate. If I want to save her, I will save her. If I don't want to save her, I will watch Monica die. What does it have to do with the other party? I have already saved my friend by relying on this news, so who am I to bargain with him? So I don't understand people who say they dare not thank the other party for revealing the information. If the other party doesn't disclose the information, Monica will die. The fact is that I saved the life of a good friend by relying on the information disclosed by the other party. No matter what purpose the other party used this behavior to achieve, it will not change the fact that I saved Monica. Shouldn't I thank the other party and instead ask the other party for money? Eliminating all distractions, for me, the essence of the whole thing is that I relied on the other party's illegal disclosure of information to save my friend from a certain death mission. Should I ask the other party for money? I really don't understand the problem here. Is my logic abnormal?