Rebirth of Napoleon Ii

It's really bad enough. The author's soul is so beautiful. Have you grown up? The subject matter is average. Except for farming and intrigues in the first 250 chapters, the battle process is as plain as water. Almost all the people who die after each battle are soldiers and the like. The generals all have the halo of God, and they are not fake at all. They are all mortal enemies and they are defeated and put back in hypocrisy. Go, refer to history for the first 250 chapters. Author, you can't tamper with history too much and need to be reasonable. I can understand this, but starting from chapter 280, it has already changed history. The time traveler is going to be a dictator and will not kill any usurpers. What the hell is that? Author, are you trying to express a few meanings? Do you want to play house with Aiki?

Chapter 278 said that killing a royal family will bring disrepute to the people. It is ridiculous that the people will not want such a person to be the emperor. You can let the government and court sentence you for any crime. If you deserve to be shot, you will be shot. If you deserve to be imprisoned, you will be imprisoned. If it is important for the royal family to commit a crime, it is okay, so the people will object, right?

Dad, where is my country?

That's a bit bullshit

Author, I think your writing style is very good and very vivid, but I have a question. Because Napoleon's son failed to inherit the throne, after the restoration, Bonaparte was called Napoleon III when he became emperor.

In modern Europe, the races can be roughly divided into Anglo-Saxons (the main race in Britain and France); Aryans (the pan-German race); and Slavs (the race of the Soviet or Warsaw Pact countries).

Can't the protagonist of a time-travel novel be changed into a handsome man or a beautiful woman? It can make people vomit after watching it, and let's understand the aesthetic fatigue.

The equipment was too advanced, and others couldn't play with it. I didn't understand it myself, so I had to pretend to be awesome. It was still very difficult to make those weapons with the technology at that time. You couldn't just say something, especially if you didn't understand it either. Also, the infantry equipment made me laugh. Even in modern times, every infantryman is not equipped with a telescope, and grenades have not been made yet, so there is no need to write them down. Everyone is confused when they are not written down. The better the equipment, the harder the logistics support is. If you only have the equipment and logistics, you can't keep up with the fight. Don't tell me that you have to build a logistics system for just one legion.

If Napoleon killed all his brothers and sisters before he died, (nominally) clearing the way for the King of Rome, and then the protagonist only saves the protagonist's parents, it would be perfect (my own woman is very complete in her own territory)

At first, I was a little confused. 1800 Was the era of flintlock muzzle-loading guns and muzzle-loading cannons. The good guys just took out the breech-loading bolt-action rifles and primer-loaded metal bullets from a hundred years later. Looking at breech-loading guns and metal cannonballs in this way, it's not that far away, right? Skip directly to flintlock smoothbore weapons, flintlock rifled weapons, percussion smoothbore weapons, percussion rifled weapons, and repeating guns. Is this the plan to start the First World War in 1800? Very good, try to build the Maxin heavy machine gun before 1810