
The Country's Country's Buffs Are Stacked Up, but the United States is Still Not Dead?
About This Novel
Tianmu takes stock of the reasons for the demise of various dynasties. Big man: Eunuch's relative! Sui Dynasty: Excessive levies and extortion Datang: Separate feudal vassals! The Song Dynasty: Emphasizing literature over martial arts Ming Dynasty: The party fights to destroy the country! Damei: I have all of the above! The emperors of various countries were shocked: Even if this is the case, the United States has not yet perished?
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(10)Scraped 3d ago
Western pseudo-historical theories are certainly not entirely correct, but there are many problems, big problems. Especially the aspect of orderly inheritance is simply impossible to think about in detail.
The United States does not have light weapons!
If the United States did not have force, it would be over!
Wanying Pagoda
Marx said that capitalism is cannibalism. He was describing cannibalism in a literal way. It was not a metaphor for exploiting people. It was real food. Go and search for this tower. There are more than a dozen places across the country. Most of the monuments erected in the 1950s and 1960s have really forgotten the way they came.
Just for the title of this book, I will give it 5 stars first and then give it in installments. Damn it
In fact, these are not correct. The change of dynasties is a good historical law, but the government is changed every four years. So when people think that this is not done well, they will just wait a few years to vote for him and change the electors instead of rebelling. Ancient dynasties are inheritance systems. Even if he does not do well, he will not step down. Only rebellion is the core. Democracy is the core. Hoover did very poorly at that time. People also waited a few years to vote for him instead of rebelling.
Seeing the military strength of both sides in the Battle of Changping, it was said that Qin invested 650,000 and Zhao invested 450,000. The two sides had a total of 1.1 Million troops. After the war, the Qin army suffered more than 200,000 casualties, and Zhao was killed by more than 400,000. So the question is, is Qin so bad? After three years of fighting, more than 200,000 people died, but Zhao had less than 50,000 people? Where did this data come from?
Ask
Are you Chinese? Is it enough?
This book is a pity. The beginning is the most popular one, but it's a pity that I don't know who deceived me.
I don't know if the so-called Rome is true or not, no one wants to see it
It's quite interesting to watch so far. Come on, author, the six monthly passes last month were useless. I'll support you first this month.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(10)Scraped 3d ago
Western pseudo-historical theories are certainly not entirely correct, but there are many problems, big problems. Especially the aspect of orderly inheritance is simply impossible to think about in detail.
The United States does not have light weapons!
If the United States did not have force, it would be over!
Wanying Pagoda
Marx said that capitalism is cannibalism. He was describing cannibalism in a literal way. It was not a metaphor for exploiting people. It was real food. Go and search for this tower. There are more than a dozen places across the country. Most of the monuments erected in the 1950s and 1960s have really forgotten the way they came.
Just for the title of this book, I will give it 5 stars first and then give it in installments. Damn it
In fact, these are not correct. The change of dynasties is a good historical law, but the government is changed every four years. So when people think that this is not done well, they will just wait a few years to vote for him and change the electors instead of rebelling. Ancient dynasties are inheritance systems. Even if he does not do well, he will not step down. Only rebellion is the core. Democracy is the core. Hoover did very poorly at that time. People also waited a few years to vote for him instead of rebelling.
Seeing the military strength of both sides in the Battle of Changping, it was said that Qin invested 650,000 and Zhao invested 450,000. The two sides had a total of 1.1 Million troops. After the war, the Qin army suffered more than 200,000 casualties, and Zhao was killed by more than 400,000. So the question is, is Qin so bad? After three years of fighting, more than 200,000 people died, but Zhao had less than 50,000 people? Where did this data come from?
Ask
Are you Chinese? Is it enough?
This book is a pity. The beginning is the most popular one, but it's a pity that I don't know who deceived me.
I don't know if the so-called Rome is true or not, no one wants to see it
It's quite interesting to watch so far. Come on, author, the six monthly passes last month were useless. I'll support you first this month.









