Truth is Everywhere Within Range

It's nice to watch, but the main character setting is annoying. My Chinese masculinity is missing. You shouldn't be so humble. Hope it can be changed later. As he is Chinese, he should have that kind of spirit. I feel uncomfortable when you write it like this, but fortunately I have read a novel about the return of all poisons before. After that time it made me cry, I have become very immune to the toxicity of the book. I endured the uncomfortable feeling while reading this book. However, the overall setting is very good, and the characters and storylines are very good. Just four stars, but unfortunately not four and a half stars

Since I learned to read book reviews before reading, I have found that I can no longer read a book. I believe that book reviews are worse than no book reviews. Everyone has their own taste in novels. The quality of a book should not only be judged by reviews. Only by reading a few chapters can you find out whether it suits your preferences. Practice is the only criterion for testing truth. It's never too late to read a few chapters. Don't just skip reading because of the reviews. You may miss a novel you like. Of course, if the novel has unanimously negative reviews, unless it is maliciously written or deliberately smeared, then it is better not to read it, lest you become too poisoned and unable to recover. I once read a novel and was poisoned by the plot. It has been more than ten years, and I still feel resentful every time I think about it. I really regret reading that novel. Thank you for your support.

The character of the protagonist of this book is different from the so-called "public". At least he knows how to be humble. This is a very attractive feature for readers who are tired of seeing pretentious people slapped in the face. Just like the name of the protagonist, he will definitely not take an ordinary route. If you just like the usual pretentious and slap-in-the-face novels, you'd better quit as soon as possible.

Although this book is good, I don't recommend it to newcomers or old book fans. After reading 100 chapters, I was so excited. The previous plot and caliber attracted me to justice, but the author deliberately portrayed the protagonist, which made me feel stupid*. Some people compare Shen Yong to him, but I can only say that he is not worthy. Shen Yong knows his own strength and does not look down on any enemy. I just feel stupid about the protagonist of this book* Although he also underestimates his enemies, he doesn't know how to collect information to compare himself, he is a brainless person.

Who doesn't need me to tell you that it's super?

After reading about ten chapters, the overall feeling is okay, but there is a very serious problem. The protagonist traveled back in time and worked in the spirit-removing industry for half a year, and even joined a formal organization. So why does the protagonist not have the slightest correct understanding of the strength of spirit-removing people and ghosts in this world? I feel like ordinary people don't know as much. Although many people think that the protagonist is similar to Shen Yong, I feel that they are far different. Shen Yong is cautious because of the messages he left in his previous life, but the protagonist really feels like he is mentally ill . Finally, I would like to ask the book friends who have been following me, at which chapter does the protagonist finally face himself?

The book is a good book, but the main character is too comical, which persuaded me to put it down, but I still have to give it five stars, because some people may take a bite of it, and the author's writing style is very good, not wordy, not verbose, and humorous. However, I am not used to this kind of book that deliberately belittles oneself and elevates others. I don't know if it will change in the future, but I can't read it anymore. In this way, I hope that the author can make a change in the later period and change the writing style, which may be more suitable for the public's taste.

There is a reason why novels are getting worse and worse nowadays. First, there is a large influx of writers (you should understand why I don't want to use authors to represent them here), and reference articles are produced in large numbers. Although there are high-quality works, the proportion becomes smaller, which leads to the division of readers' resources for good novels. It's not easy for readers to discover it. After all, I don't bother to look through a novel with the same title. I just click on it and read it. If you have the patience, you won't find many novels one by one. For example, chefs, there are a large group of chefs, some of them are good chefs. The good chef made a good dish, and the chef followed and learned from it. This kind of dish is everywhere, and it is very troublesome for diners to find it. The unlucky ones can just find a restaurant and eat it. Good chefs lose diners. Don't tell me about patents from other industries. Is there a novel here? Just look at those Douluo *** The second is meaningless negative reviews. Although they are not good-looking, ratings are personal rights. But it's also great for us to give them some suggestions for negative reviews. Giving them suggestions allows authors who can listen to the suggestions to understand their own shortcomings, improve their self-writing outline process, and improve their writing skills. This is also good for us readers, isn't it? This is like a diner who thinks the dish is not delicious and yells in the lobby that the dish is not delicious. Maybe someone likes this taste, right? It will only make others treat you like a monkey or a dog. If you don't like this dish, you can tell the chef if you don't like it, and you don't have to be that monkey. A good chef will definitely listen, right? If you don't listen, you can read down and tell me. The third is a group of guardian dogs. You are awesome and you write this kind of thing. It is really annoying. The kind that gives one star and says that the article is hot but does not say where the hot chicken is. You can criticize it. But the kind of low-star reviews that write what they think are toxic and problematic. I don't know why you also criticize. Is it because you think it's not good and give it one star but don't say what the problem is. Is it okay to make the author so confused that he can't think about himself and continue to make a mess of the next book? Or are you just spraying for the sake of spraying, without even looking at it. For example, it's still a chef. There's nothing easy to compare this group of things to, and most people understand it. The reality is not smooth. When I meet others saying that the food I eat is not delicious, I think of myself being criticized. I automatically assume the role of a chef. I feel that the person criticizing the chef and the boss criticizing me overlap, and I can't help but get into a fight. It doesn't mean I understand them. After all, it's easier for whoever is wronged, right? We are wronged when they are wronged. This group of them also keeps some good chefs from hearing advice, so don't be merciful Fourth, this is the problem on the author's side. Just delete the unintelligent negative comments, no problem. Those low-star recommendation posts are certainly not good-looking. But those are precious resources, where you have a greater chance of discovering your own shortcomings. Of course, you are just a waste of money. You need a seemingly harmonious comment area to attract the brainless and cool writers of Xiaobai Jiucai. Just think that what I said in this post is nonsense, and everyone will say eh ah novel. If you don't make money, it says that good chefs will listen to suggestions given to chefs because they want to become better and earn more money, so they will definitely listen. Those who don't listen will be eliminated sooner or later (of course, the elimination rate is lower than the joining rate, so there are still many lazy chefs). Your cooking is not delicious. The diners are not allowed to say what will happen to the diners. Not counting the overwhelming publicity that this restaurant is not delicious, ordinary people will remember it immediately when asked by friends at a gathering if there are any good restaurants. Don't go to that small restaurant somewhere. If the food is terrible, others will say it, and then you will be eliminated naturally, right? So you can do whatever you want. I'm not forcing you to be good. There are plenty of good authors out there, right? Why do I talk so much? Because I feel uncomfortable with my free time. After all, I have no money and no power. Apart from games, I only read novels. After reading it, I had a lot of time to daze, so I wrote this. [Emot=default,52/]It has 1288/3000 words and poor expression ability. I don't believe anyone can read it to the end.

And the setting of the protagonist successfully persuaded me. I don't like the protagonist who is suspicious of everything, suspicious of everything and cares about this and that.

Has the author established a QQ group?