I Saved the Souls of the Dead for a Hundred Years in Jin Dynasty

I think that in the online literary world, many people (or maybe I am one too) praise Taoism and suppress Buddhism? In fact, think about the reasons: 1. Buddhism has not had the same self-division as Taoism since ancient times. Once we mention evil people, what immediately comes to mind are: evil people (evils becoming enlightened) and evil people (evil people, evil people pretending to be Taoist priests, cheating, abducting and stealing). When a bad person or a demonic monk comes out of Buddhism, what we think of is (the monk who does not abide by the precepts is still a member of your Buddhist school. After all, your Buddhist school preaches that you should put down your butcher knife and become a Buddha immediately!) Therefore, the first reason why I have a bad impression of Buddhism is that Buddhism has no self-division. 2. The Chinese people respect their ancestors. When talking about Taoism or Taoism, everyone knows that Huang Lao must be mentioned. So who are we? We are the descendants of the Yan and Huang people, so to a certain extent, Taoism and Taoism are related to our ancestors in people's subconscious mind, and are their own family's things. What's more, this kind of doctrine, thought, and sect are originally local thoughts and sects. So we all have a certain degree of closeness. So when it comes to Buddha, everyone thinks that she is a foreigner's daughter-in-law, a local man, not the same surname, and not from the same family as you. Moreover, now that the literacy rate in New China has increased, most people know about the several events that destroyed Buddhism in history, so they really don't have that much favorable impression of Buddhism! Suggestion: If the author of an online article wants to write about Buddhism, he or she should 1. Cut out the inside of Buddhism, or 2. Like a dream machine, directly come to the conclusion that Buddha is the Tao. Or simply be like the protagonist of Yangshen and say that "Buddha" is a wise man and just a teacher. If someone says that Buddha is everything and Buddha is the highest, that is the path of evil. If the author doesn't cut it, doesn't change the definition, and just writes it randomly, it's like adding a dog to the book, your book will never be good and it will never be popular.

All kinds of Buddha Buddha Buddha Buddha are very annoying. Is the author a Buddhist believer?

This book belongs to the supreme monk. In the opening chapter, the protagonist's first sentence after being reborn in another world is to say Buddha three times, and then he wakes up and finds that he has been reborn. In addition, the IQ of the protagonist is difficult to say, and the book seriously discriminates against non-Buddhists. The protagonist has cultivated for 80 years, saved the souls of the dead, and disturbed the underworld. Then he met a bull-headed horse-face. His first reaction was to use a magic weapon (the protagonist's magic weapon is a Taoist magic weapon, and was called an immortal friend by the city god) to collect the bull-head. Horse-faced ran away, and then horse-faced actually came to use the Yin soldiers to take advantage of it. Was he preparing to destroy the village? The protagonist actually thinks that there is nothing wrong with accepting the cow head? In short, Buddha is supreme

I'm very curious. After a hundred years of transcendence, you haven't even started to step on the horse for two or three years and you have already started investigating and handling cases. Where are the ghosts of the transcendence?

He cherishes his own life while doing important things, but he is just a slut and makes trouble everywhere. When it comes to important things, he behaves like he is serving the country and the people. It looks like I'm playing a big game of chess, and it's boring for people to watch.

The author can live so long thanks to the harmony in our country

Come on, the monk writes a book that is invincible...

This plot is really not fascinating!

1. The plot of the story is a bit messy, and maybe the author's layout is too profound. 2. The biggest advantage of modern people in ancient times is their unconstrained imagination. Isn't this book too dull? 3. The plots drawn by men and women are too dramatic.

For the sake of writing this, all I need is your support, investment, recommendation tickets, monthly tickets. If you can help, please do so. Thank you.