
Let You Debate, and You Will Work Hard Every Day
by Preserved Egg With Red Pepper
About This Novel
After Lin Qing traveled through time, he found that he had become the youngest member of the Debate Team of Shanghai University. At the same time, they are participating in a live debate competition! Contestants need to debate based on the debate topics of the competition group. In the face of love, Lin Qing: "Love is the sinking of free will. I can choose not to fall in love with her, but I can't choose not to love her." The whole audience cried when one beat seven to the limit. Facing history, Lin Qing said: "The name of the prosperous era of Kangxi and Qianlong is naturally inconsistent with its reality, because the name of Yongzheng has not yet been added." Netizen: "Can you still play like this?!" Lin Qing: "Just say it's right or not." After the program was broadcast, the people were shocked! A generation of Zhenghuo Tianzun was born!
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(24)Scraped 4d ago
Additional thoughts for the affirmative in the first debate. First of all, we affirm that the opposing side pointed out that the people in the prosperous age of Qianyong may not be as happy as that of recuperation. But the reality is that you won't be able to recuperate forever. The growth of bureaucracy and gentry squeezes the people. This is inevitable after stabilization within a certain period of time. In the 17th year of Qian Yong, Obai was beheaded and the Three Feudatories were destroyed. One was to attack the bureaucracy, and the other was to attack the king represented by the squires. This fundamentally liberated a group of peasants and returned them to the leadership of the government. And cracking down on bureaucracy is a way to purify the government and help the people achieve better health. This is equivalent to re-creating a prosperous age when a prosperous age failed, so we call it a prosperous age. What is prosperity? The period when the people are most powerful, at their peak, and have the best sense of happiness in a period of time is called a prosperous age. Of course, I think the people's point of view written by the author is really amazing and more in line with our current people-centered thinking.
Rubbish
Nowadays, novels are becoming more and more rubbish. I just don't want to read short videos before reading novels. As a result, these jokes are just copied and pasted. The writing is still poor, so I might as well watch short videos.
There is only the opening argument, which is nonsense.
There were too many digressions, the focus of the debate was skewed, and the ending was also off-topic. The one about love was so off-topic.
How should I put it? It seems passionate but it has already happened. Change a few things and add a bit of the author's own history. Is that Yang Li the protagonist?
This is called whole life.
I suggest giving the whole system to Yang Li.
The writing is quite good, there are no poisonous points so far, and the meaning is expressed very clearly.
There is very little content about the debate. Most of them write about the reactions of netizens in the live broadcast room and the reactions and contradictions of the judges. There are not many positive articles about the protagonist's debate about NB. If you want to read the debate, it is not recommended.
Are you embarrassed by re-conflicting and forcibly reducing intelligence?
When I saw the word "debate" in the title of the book, I immediately thought of "extreme one wears seven". When I saw the introduction, it turned out to be the case!
Rating
Community(0)
Official(24)Scraped 4d ago
Additional thoughts for the affirmative in the first debate. First of all, we affirm that the opposing side pointed out that the people in the prosperous age of Qianyong may not be as happy as that of recuperation. But the reality is that you won't be able to recuperate forever. The growth of bureaucracy and gentry squeezes the people. This is inevitable after stabilization within a certain period of time. In the 17th year of Qian Yong, Obai was beheaded and the Three Feudatories were destroyed. One was to attack the bureaucracy, and the other was to attack the king represented by the squires. This fundamentally liberated a group of peasants and returned them to the leadership of the government. And cracking down on bureaucracy is a way to purify the government and help the people achieve better health. This is equivalent to re-creating a prosperous age when a prosperous age failed, so we call it a prosperous age. What is prosperity? The period when the people are most powerful, at their peak, and have the best sense of happiness in a period of time is called a prosperous age. Of course, I think the people's point of view written by the author is really amazing and more in line with our current people-centered thinking.
Rubbish
Nowadays, novels are becoming more and more rubbish. I just don't want to read short videos before reading novels. As a result, these jokes are just copied and pasted. The writing is still poor, so I might as well watch short videos.
There is only the opening argument, which is nonsense.
There were too many digressions, the focus of the debate was skewed, and the ending was also off-topic. The one about love was so off-topic.
How should I put it? It seems passionate but it has already happened. Change a few things and add a bit of the author's own history. Is that Yang Li the protagonist?
This is called whole life.
I suggest giving the whole system to Yang Li.
The writing is quite good, there are no poisonous points so far, and the meaning is expressed very clearly.
There is very little content about the debate. Most of them write about the reactions of netizens in the live broadcast room and the reactions and contradictions of the judges. There are not many positive articles about the protagonist's debate about NB. If you want to read the debate, it is not recommended.
Are you embarrassed by re-conflicting and forcibly reducing intelligence?
When I saw the word "debate" in the title of the book, I immediately thought of "extreme one wears seven". When I saw the introduction, it turned out to be the case!









