Show it Off, My Lord

I wanted to keep watching, but I couldn't do it anymore If you want to write a romance book, that's fine, and if you want to write a time-travel lord novel, that's fine too. But look at what you wrote! I can accept that native politicians are stupid, greedy and shameless, but what about the protagonist? The protagonist's character image is too divided. While doing things that everyone is equal, he plays ambiguous games with himself with the territory and the lives of the people in the territory. He seems to care about every life around him, but in fact he is using kindergarten-like methods to destroy his territory. I don't know who has misunderstood war and life, the protagonist, the author, or myself. If limited to the world background, I can understand these three views. It is said that the protagonist is a time traveler, but apart from the set knowledge and the new century values ​​​​like imitating cats and tigers, he really doesn't look like him. Please tell me, author, whether the protagonist has two brains or two souls. Extreme selfishness disguised as selflessness, incompetence masked by cheats, indecision, and no distinction between public and private. This kind of character cannot be a leader in the farming novels that I think are acceptable. If the protagonist has progress and growth as a lord, tell me where it is! The plot can be like a game to the author, but not to the characters. The characterization of the characters is difficult to describe in one sentence. Except for the extremely shameless and incompetent characters, the author has lost the ability to control the characters with slightly richer descriptions. After two hundred chapters, I didn't feel that the protagonist was a complete character at all. It seemed like the settings and personality were forcibly mixed together. I failed to see the protagonist clearly, and my intuition told me that neither did you, the author. I have the spirit to refuse to write mindless and cool articles, but I don't have the ability to depict characters and plots. Tell me, author, what do you want to write, what do you want to write, what do you want our readers to see?

In terms of weapons, I feel a bit like Roland in The Witch, but Roland has the ability of a witch to realize his thoughts. Maybe this film also has it but it is not shown or the strength is not enough. Anyway, I think it is impossible to make weapons. Did the author make a mistake in setting up the protagonist? Then there is the fact that the male protagonist is a saintly dog. Really, it doesn't mean that you are a saint if you don't kill people, but it is impossible not to kill people for everything. Even now, the death penalty has not been completely abolished. How can those who burned the food survive? I don't quite understand. Even if they don't kill them all, it's impossible not to kill them all. People's anger needs to be vented, and it can't be settled with just a few nonsense words. What they did is something that no one can tolerate, and they are still allowed to live like this. I can understand if these people can be exchanged for food. On the contrary, it is extremely stupid. The money issue in this book is huge. It's complete nonsense. It takes too much for granted. Everything is given to you. Buy things, buy, buy, buy. No money? Selling, selling, no one? Buy, buy, buy, buy back? All of them will immediately become free citizens. They will be given land, jobs, money and food to eat. What kind of reward do they need, or how can they get their money back? What? Payback? Get your money back? I am a lord, I can do whatever I want. The people who bought me back cannot riot or anything else can happen. Everything is under my control. Then my own subjects complain that the slaves can still get land, but they don't. The subjects pay taxes. This is so unreasonable. What? Unreasonable? It's okay. All the former citizens can pay half of the tax. Anyway, the money can be earned through business. It's very reasonable, so you won't say anything. I don't care what the knights, guards, bachelors and citizens in the territory who supported me before think about it. Anyway, I don't care. I am a lord. You must listen to what I say. You have to keep up with my thinking. Don't you listen? Can't keep up? Then I will get angry and hum ╯^╰💢💢💢, and then say that I am doing the right thing, and you have to believe me, just like a child. Slavery cannot be changed immediately if you want to change it. You should take your time, give them the opportunity to be promoted to freemen, and gradually promote them instead of telling them that you are no longer slaves. Like the witch Roland, you can get rid of slave status by achieving the goal. This is beneficial to the rule, and the opposition will not be so big. I don't know whether the author wants equality too much or whether the protagonist is a fool and wants everyone to be equal. This is an impossible thing to do. It's the same mistake that most novels make. Most of the protagonists who travel to a feudal society want to engage in human rights. If you want to do this, you can set the protagonist as a primary school student instead of an adult. Most of them Most adults know that this is impossible, especially top students. They know this for sure. They may be naive when they first come out of society, but those who have worked have basically known it. However, many authors still like to write like this. You can write if you want, but at least you have to do it gradually, slowly from one to ten, rather than directly to ten immediately. Isn't this nonsense? Sophia's plot is just a piece of shit, extremely stiff. The author has decided that this is an unsolvable topic, but the author still thinks it's reasonable. Sophia has already killed someone. How can Natalie say that the punishment for attempted murder should not be so severe? Oh my god, and the protagonist really agreed,? ? ? ? ? I was confused. Except for the protagonist and Sophia, I thought all the plots were fine. But these two characters, haha, can only be said to be the author's decision. There is no explanation. If the protagonist does not have the aura of the protagonist, I think he will have only one end, and that is the same as the great time traveler Wang Mang. No, it should not be the same as Comrade Wang Mang, but die faster and more miserably than him. At least Comrade Wang Mang became the emperor, and the protagonist died at the hands of assassins long ago. I don't see what ability the protagonist has to resist the crushing times.

To be honest, many people don't like this book because it's not exciting enough! I am different. Although I have only read a mere 2,000 hours, this book has been very good in my nine years of reading. I read the reviews, and the one who gave it one star said that the protagonist was criticized in the early stages, so he couldn't stand it and thought the political officer was the protagonist. All I can say is that I haven't read enough books. Although the combat part is indeed exaggerated, the character description is so realistic. Especially that royal family, from the perspective of the ancient European century, they were so stupid! But it's also due to the times.

I don't know why there are so many negative reviews. What's going on? In the past, the so-called cool writing meant defeating monsters and leveling up, and enjoying grudges. In fact, anyone can write this kind of vernacular writing. It's not very difficult. It's just a matter of getting a golden finger. From beginning to end, you kill and rob everyone. The plot and character descriptions are basically elementary school students' compositions, suitable for one-shot, fast-food literature. However, the story, characters, and plot descriptions in this article are very delicate and suitable for chewing slowly. I personally think that the author's narrative, characterization, and world view design are all superior works.

No one likes to talk nonsense. Your writing style, setting, and plot are just a novice who has just entered the trap with a clear knowledge.

I've read 500 of them. The main character is too weak. It seems like anyone can kill him. He lets people go everywhere and is indecisive.

The protagonist is so naive. Who do you think you are to bring peace to the world? If you go without food for a few days, will you grab it?

The world is macroscopic, but the conflicts are inexplicable. In the early stage, the enemy is a big country in two continents. The protagonist lives a prosperous life with more than a thousand people, but there is no system in this book, so you can imagine how awkward it is. Virgin bitch can no longer describe the protagonist, because even if you want to kill him and kill your soldiers and people, as long as you are a beautiful woman, the protagonist will keep letting you go and fall in love with you. Regardless of whether you betrayed the protagonist or not, you will be forgiven if you return your allegiance. Even if you hack the protagonist's money, as long as you come back to make money from him next time, you will continue to cooperate with you. Doesn't it feel good?

Such a good book, no one has read it

The protagonist has an unpleasant personality, is indecisive, has no political skills, and relies on modern technology to cheat, which is not realistic. (For example, do people living in cities really remember how to make engines?) Relying on the indigenous people to forcibly bring out the aura of the protagonist. It's really painful to watch.