After the Huangchao Rebellion, Zhu Wen usurped the Tang Dynasty. Over the past fifty years, there were thirteen emperors with five surnames in the Central Plains. After he arrived, he stayed dormant for ten years, read three thousand volumes of poems and books, and mastered the sword for killing people on the battlefield; he fought for ten years, blood flowed three thousand miles from north to south, and defeated powerful enemies with iron horses and golden swords; he governed the country for ten years, and made three thousand strategies for the country every day, and his hair grew gray by candlelight at night... One day, he will finally become the emperor of ten kingdoms. How should he end the troubled times, and how should he shape the ever-powerful Tang Dynasty?
Seriously, this is one of the best historical novels I have ever read.
If you write fiction, I won't say much, but if you write historical fiction, can you be a little more realistic? You have mixed modern ideas into this history, which looks too awkward. For readers like us who are used to reading historical texts and have a little knowledge of the dynasties at that time, it looks very awkward. If you are writing fictional stories and plots, I can't fault you, but when you write actual historical texts about the dynasties at that time, you didn't write clearly about the thoughts and environment of the people at all.
The more I read this book, the less I can stand it. What is the position of your book? Is it a second creation with history as the background or a fiction based on imaginary history? It was okay at first, but I couldn't watch it later. Later, he became invincible and cool, and his opponent forcibly lowered his IQ. The protagonist only has two at a time, and every time he wins with less, it's really like a fantasy novel where one person kills a hundred thousand. Historical novels focus on power and strategy, not on being the best in the world in terms of force. Look at the reasons why the emperors in the Five Dynasties countries were short-lived. They were indeed capable of fighting, but only reigned for three to five years. Also, you want to be the emperor and unify the world. In the early stage, you will go to the battlefield in person and take the lead every time. You are afraid that you will not survive for a long time. Why are all your men useless? In history, who has fought fiercely and fiercely has become the emperor? This kind of protagonist still wants to dominate the world. He is not qualified as a commander. He is at best a vanguard. The ups and downs of the plot can be fascinating. Write more defeats and wins and losses to be consistent with history. In history, the founding emperors of the past dynasties had more defeats than wins. They only won the key battles by luck and unified the world. Liu Bang had never won before the decisive battle between Liu Bang and Xiang Yu. When Zhu Yuanzhang and Chen Youliang fought, who was stronger and who was weaker. The protagonist is victorious in every battle. The whole story is about defeating the many with less, and there are no strategies left. The famous ministers and generals stopped at the early stage, and it was just written as an invincible and cool story with the historical background. I remembered a sentence I saw before. In ancient times, only a few people were admitted to the imperial examination nationwide. In terms of wisdom, Tsinghua University and Peking University were not worthy of carrying shoes to others. They were just limited by the environment at that time. It does not mean that ancient people were stupid.
Wasn't Cui Linglong's head presented to Li Congjing by Shi Jingtang?
It's more realistic, and I like to read slow-burning novels that directly fit my criteria.
A time traveler can only fight and kill
In troubled times, if you don't advance through killing to establish your authority, how can you be a Bodhisattva and persuade others to do good?
When the protagonist travels back in time, he becomes a fierce man from ancient times without any modern thinking. It's like traveling to the Three Kingdoms to challenge a military commander. It's funny.
The ninth-grade team leader also wants to be granted the title of emperor? Talent
Seriously, this is one of the best historical novels I have ever read.
If you write fiction, I won't say much, but if you write historical fiction, can you be a little more realistic? You have mixed modern ideas into this history, which looks too awkward. For readers like us who are used to reading historical texts and have a little knowledge of the dynasties at that time, it looks very awkward. If you are writing fictional stories and plots, I can't fault you, but when you write actual historical texts about the dynasties at that time, you didn't write clearly about the thoughts and environment of the people at all.
The more I read this book, the less I can stand it. What is the position of your book? Is it a second creation with history as the background or a fiction based on imaginary history? It was okay at first, but I couldn't watch it later. Later, he became invincible and cool, and his opponent forcibly lowered his IQ. The protagonist only has two at a time, and every time he wins with less, it's really like a fantasy novel where one person kills a hundred thousand. Historical novels focus on power and strategy, not on being the best in the world in terms of force. Look at the reasons why the emperors in the Five Dynasties countries were short-lived. They were indeed capable of fighting, but only reigned for three to five years. Also, you want to be the emperor and unify the world. In the early stage, you will go to the battlefield in person and take the lead every time. You are afraid that you will not survive for a long time. Why are all your men useless? In history, who has fought fiercely and fiercely has become the emperor? This kind of protagonist still wants to dominate the world. He is not qualified as a commander. He is at best a vanguard. The ups and downs of the plot can be fascinating. Write more defeats and wins and losses to be consistent with history. In history, the founding emperors of the past dynasties had more defeats than wins. They only won the key battles by luck and unified the world. Liu Bang had never won before the decisive battle between Liu Bang and Xiang Yu. When Zhu Yuanzhang and Chen Youliang fought, who was stronger and who was weaker. The protagonist is victorious in every battle. The whole story is about defeating the many with less, and there are no strategies left. The famous ministers and generals stopped at the early stage, and it was just written as an invincible and cool story with the historical background. I remembered a sentence I saw before. In ancient times, only a few people were admitted to the imperial examination nationwide. In terms of wisdom, Tsinghua University and Peking University were not worthy of carrying shoes to others. They were just limited by the environment at that time. It does not mean that ancient people were stupid.
Wasn't Cui Linglong's head presented to Li Congjing by Shi Jingtang?
It's more realistic, and I like to read slow-burning novels that directly fit my criteria.
A time traveler can only fight and kill
In troubled times, if you don't advance through killing to establish your authority, how can you be a Bodhisattva and persuade others to do good?
When the protagonist travels back in time, he becomes a fierce man from ancient times without any modern thinking. It's like traveling to the Three Kingdoms to challenge a military commander. It's funny.
The ninth-grade team leader also wants to be granted the title of emperor? Talent
The general's kindness is not over yet