The Red-Hot Years: A Young Doctor and His Childhood Friend Go to the Countryside

The main line is clear, but there are many shortcomings. 1. The age discussion is confusing: 18 is a bit too long to live through. 2. Lack of description language: no one will compete with you in one sentence 3. Lack of common sense. Meat tickets, oil tickets, etc. Are all limited. It is impossible to braise pork every now and then. Forget it, talking too much will undermine the author's confidence. The structure of the main story is still clear and clear. The protagonists in the book are so comprehensive and delicate. The author should also be more delicate and stand up to more scrutiny. Don't let readers complain about the details.

What to eat in the morning and what to eat in the evening? One chapter is fine, but dozens of chapters are too much.

It's bland, without any ideas or ideas. A sentence appears only once every few chapters. Is this hydrology or what does it mean?

To be honest, I can keep reading the first 300 chapters or so. When I got to the county hospital, I was confused. The preface didn't match the subtitles, even AI wouldn't write it like this. It's my first time to write a review, and I really can't stand it.

Recommendation vote, monthly vote has been voted, can you update a few more chapters?

Times are chaotic. In 1975, you could listen to the then-poisonous weed Red Rock on the radio, and buy selected poems of Rabindranath Tagore in bookstores. There is no electricity but you can use the radio. Wells and cellars can be dug at minus 30 degrees Celsius.

From treating people, to treating cows, pigs and dogs, there is no atmosphere of the era, it is all the nonsense of today.

Is it funny that a team of health workers don't purchase basic medicines?

Holy Virgin Protagonist, others have slapped you in the face, but you also handed your face over and let others step on it hard

Although it is a bit dull, overall it is still good, the writing is also very good, and it is clear and logical.