Xu Xiaoxian traveled through the Jiajing period, when he was still a royal guard. He originally wanted to live a petty bourgeois life with a little power in his hands, a small courtyard in his house, and a little money in his pocket.
But unexpectedly, his military achievements were robbed, and there was no hope of promotion...
No way.
In order not to disappoint my widowed sister-in-law, I must get it back!
Many years later.
Yan Song: "Who forced him to make progress back then? Find out!"
Zhang Juzheng: "Don't call me the chief assistant, he is the chief assistant!"
Jiajing: "Yeah, I'll go practice Taoism first. If I need anything, I'll see Xu Xiaoxian!"
…
Xu Xiaoxian: "You told me, I just want to be a royal guard, why do you have to mess with me?"
Qiu Luan: "You blame me?"
I hope I can see the ending of this book in my lifetime. I am 28 years old this year. I hope the author will not walk behind me.
I'm not happy that you followed too little and too slowly. I gave you all the votes. I won't give you a ticket if you're so slow again.
At least it gave me a good ending
It was very well written. Why did it end so quickly?
@7 Donkeys in the production team don't even dare to rest like this.
@7 The book is a good book and the storyline is not exaggerated. I can read it. This is the author. He must be quite young and has a strong heart but is unable to do what he wants! Not being able to stand up is also a problem.
Having said so much, it was just a sudden thought and had no other meaning. Finally, I wish the author is full of talent and inspiration, and writes better and better as he writes! Come on!
(Continued) To find a suitable position between the two, the author needs to work hard. I wanted to give an example, but I thought it wouldn't be appropriate so I forgot about it.
On a side note, in fact, in a good novel, excellent description of supporting characters is the most effective way to improve the quality of the entire novel. In most current novels, it can be said that only the protagonist has a complete "personality", while the other characters are mostly paper figures with no personality or personality but no growth. However, it will take more energy to achieve this, and non-full-time authors will often make choices here.
Regarding time travel novels, I think the difficulty lies in the "tampering" of history. Of course, it is not difficult to tamper with history. The difficulty lies in the development of the plot after the historical change. It must be logical and have a wonderful story, and it must also show inextricable connections with the original history. For readers, the real excitement of a good time-travel novel lies in the process of changing "history". For the author, instead of writing a "time-travel historical novel", it is better to say that he is writing an "alternative historical novel". It is easy to say, but to do it, in addition to the author's rigorous thinking logic and deep understanding of history, he also needs to carefully consider how to polish his writing.
Most authors of time-travel novels either advance the plot strictly in accordance with the evolution of history and emphasize their powerlessness to change history, or they write nonsense without any logic. Although history has changed, it gives people an unreasonable sense of violation everywhere.
Soldiers call themselves villains, those with official positions call themselves humble, and those with general positions call themselves junior generals. However, in the Ming Dynasty, no generals called themselves junior generals because only unofficial generals could call themselves junior generals. So the author wants the protagonist to be a warlord? The horror of ignorance
I hope I can see the ending of this book in my lifetime. I am 28 years old this year. I hope the author will not walk behind me.
I'm not happy that you followed too little and too slowly. I gave you all the votes. I won't give you a ticket if you're so slow again.
At least it gave me a good ending
It was very well written. Why did it end so quickly?
@7 Donkeys in the production team don't even dare to rest like this.
@7 The book is a good book and the storyline is not exaggerated. I can read it. This is the author. He must be quite young and has a strong heart but is unable to do what he wants! Not being able to stand up is also a problem.
Having said so much, it was just a sudden thought and had no other meaning. Finally, I wish the author is full of talent and inspiration, and writes better and better as he writes! Come on!
(Continued) To find a suitable position between the two, the author needs to work hard. I wanted to give an example, but I thought it wouldn't be appropriate so I forgot about it. On a side note, in fact, in a good novel, excellent description of supporting characters is the most effective way to improve the quality of the entire novel. In most current novels, it can be said that only the protagonist has a complete "personality", while the other characters are mostly paper figures with no personality or personality but no growth. However, it will take more energy to achieve this, and non-full-time authors will often make choices here.
Regarding time travel novels, I think the difficulty lies in the "tampering" of history. Of course, it is not difficult to tamper with history. The difficulty lies in the development of the plot after the historical change. It must be logical and have a wonderful story, and it must also show inextricable connections with the original history. For readers, the real excitement of a good time-travel novel lies in the process of changing "history". For the author, instead of writing a "time-travel historical novel", it is better to say that he is writing an "alternative historical novel". It is easy to say, but to do it, in addition to the author's rigorous thinking logic and deep understanding of history, he also needs to carefully consider how to polish his writing. Most authors of time-travel novels either advance the plot strictly in accordance with the evolution of history and emphasize their powerlessness to change history, or they write nonsense without any logic. Although history has changed, it gives people an unreasonable sense of violation everywhere.
Soldiers call themselves villains, those with official positions call themselves humble, and those with general positions call themselves junior generals. However, in the Ming Dynasty, no generals called themselves junior generals because only unofficial generals could call themselves junior generals. So the author wants the protagonist to be a warlord? The horror of ignorance