Ji Chang accidentally traveled to the ancient parallel world with an atlas of wonders and became the last monarch of a vassal state.
He found that as long as he changed people's views on the dynasty by building wonders, the dynasty would be as powerful as it was boasted to be.
It is said in later generations that all of his powerful soldiers were wearing heavy armor and riding red-blooded horses. One man could kill hundreds of enemies;
So everyone in his army really wore heavy armor and rode tall horses, and one person was as brave as a hundred people.
In order to avoid the fate of being captured alive by the annihilation of the country, Jichang ignored the dissuasion of his courtiers and began to build wonders——
Terracotta Warriors, Star-Zhaing Tower, Forbidden City, Temple of Heaven, Imperial Capital...
As magnificent wonders are unearthed one after another, people in later generations are excited: What, the seven continents and four oceans have been our country's indivisible inherent territory since ancient times?
The book is a good book, there are no obvious poisonous points, and the ending is a bit clumsy, but judging from the plot, there is nothing major wrong with it.
After reading the book review, I deleted the paragraph and stopped reading!
The logic is confusing. It was said earlier that people today don't know the history before the Han Dynasty, but later there appeared a group of people who had learned knowledge about the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods since childhood.
Spectacle wins, right? Play civilization or empire?
What's behind? Are all the courtiers keeping it for the New Year?
Writing about the imperial court was too witty, thinking that I was Qianlong leaving He Shen to be killed by Jiaqing.
What is written after chapter 50 is laji, after reading a few chapters it is completely zhizhang. If you dare to kill the people you want to protect in front of you, you are still a prince. If they rebel and kill you, do you still have to go and kill yourself? This saves them from having to attack the palace, for fear that they won't be able to get in.
The author, this cool article is okay, but a bit lacking in brains. If the author reads more history books before writing historical fictional novels, the readability will be much higher
The subject matter is indeed novel, but the follow-up plot feels a bit off, and the writing style in many places is not very good. For example, you want to write about the court, but you write so intellectually, you write about the talent you have raised, but in the end, you kill the killer when you change hands. The sports students you have trained for a few days can beat ten. . .
I just want to tell the author that it was sheer nonsense to allow common people to study in that era, because studying required a lot of time. Who would farm the land? And the world was peaceful. If a large number of people studied in the troubled times before, don't think it is impossible because we are in peace.
The book is a good book, there are no obvious poisonous points, and the ending is a bit clumsy, but judging from the plot, there is nothing major wrong with it.
After reading the book review, I deleted the paragraph and stopped reading!
The logic is confusing. It was said earlier that people today don't know the history before the Han Dynasty, but later there appeared a group of people who had learned knowledge about the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods since childhood.
Spectacle wins, right? Play civilization or empire?
What's behind? Are all the courtiers keeping it for the New Year?
Writing about the imperial court was too witty, thinking that I was Qianlong leaving He Shen to be killed by Jiaqing.
What is written after chapter 50 is laji, after reading a few chapters it is completely zhizhang. If you dare to kill the people you want to protect in front of you, you are still a prince. If they rebel and kill you, do you still have to go and kill yourself? This saves them from having to attack the palace, for fear that they won't be able to get in.
The author, this cool article is okay, but a bit lacking in brains. If the author reads more history books before writing historical fictional novels, the readability will be much higher
The subject matter is indeed novel, but the follow-up plot feels a bit off, and the writing style in many places is not very good. For example, you want to write about the court, but you write so intellectually, you write about the talent you have raised, but in the end, you kill the killer when you change hands. The sports students you have trained for a few days can beat ten. . .
I just want to tell the author that it was sheer nonsense to allow common people to study in that era, because studying required a lot of time. Who would farm the land? And the world was peaceful. If a large number of people studied in the troubled times before, don't think it is impossible because we are in peace.