Technology: Building the Pinnacle of China Starts with Promoting Yingjiang

Generally speaking, they are basically technologies modified by the system magic, and then they are praised

I gave up after reading more than ten chapters. Science and technology articles can be wild and unconstrained, but they cannot be illogical. In a national-level confidentiality organization, the plane was lost for more than ten days and no one found it, and then suddenly an epoch-making product appeared. Not to mention whether the security system is a labor of love, tell me how one person can install dozens of tons of things. Isn't it good to just give ideas, theories, and drawings? Write the article more logically

Hey, I really don't want to give a bad review for San Guan Zheng's book. But I still have to write with Nao Zi. . . Too fake

In fact, I personally can accept brainless cool writing. I think that brainless cool writing is just that the details cannot withstand scrutiny, but the basic logic is okay. Brainless refers to ignoring some details, but the basic development path of the event cannot have huge logical conflicts. This book feels to me like it is treating the reader as a fool, and I can't complete the story in the book by making up my own imagination. The research and development of the first fighter jet is still barely understandable, very barely. After all, it is related to the male protagonist's study career. I was already very uncomfortable watching this section. To complete the logic closed loop, you have to ignore the issue of engine materials, ignore the issue of the chip source of the intelligent system in the aircraft, ignore It is reasonable for your plot to ignore many details such as the origin of the idea of the UAV combat cluster. The second time you go to build a nuclear submarine, no problem. It can be explained to the outside world that you are a genius and can learn everything quickly, but you come up and directly change the fission reactor into a controllable fusion reactor? Even if your system is powerful, do you dare to take out this thing? It's still a hand-made fusion reactor. Let's not talk about the structural problems, material problems and other issues of your fusion reactor. It is about how a researcher who has never been exposed to fusion theory in his resume can use his own imagination to make a small nuclear fusion reactor and install it into a nuclear submarine. It doesn't make any sense.

Q: How to express that foreigners are angry? Answer: Fak Q: How to express that foreigners are very angry? Answer: Farke! Farke! Farke! Whether it is Britain, the United States, France, Australia or Russia, Germany, Vietnam, India and the Philippines. Don't ask, just ask, it's Fake! How did a book with this kind of writing get a score of 9?

Such a big plane is missing. Is it so difficult that it won't be discovered?

Why not just use the spacecraft?

The controllable nuclear fusion power station is built and the electricity is free? Bullshit or not? Does electricity transmission cost nothing? No cost for manual maintenance? Let alone profit, self-sufficiency is required, right? Are the wages paid in oil, salt, rice and vinegar? Are you self-sufficient in oil, salt, rice and vinegar? When repairing electrical equipment, do you distribute oil, salt, rice and vinegar yourself?

⬆️Language is like a piano string that strikes the resonant frequency of the heartstrings.

⬆️Philosophical conversations that transcend time and space flow between the pages.