I'm Just Teaching the Law. Why Are You Calling Me an Outlaw?

There are typos and omissions throughout the entire article... And mistakes in key legal provisions, which seriously affects the viewing experience -_- The plot is basically a retelling of Teacher Luo's story, with a little bit of litigation added.

I can't stand it anymore after reading Chapter 10

There are a lot of typos, and some of the plots are a bit confusing, and some of the knowledge is a bit incorrect.

The content is okay, but there are a lot of typos and omissions. You can guess as you read.

More than 270 chapters were written by different people?

The early stage was okay. There are too many things discussed in the next chapter, which makes me indigestive. You can slow down for a while. In addition, there are some things that you are too subjective. What the law needs is objectivity.

Why do you have to write a title twice? It's a lie. I can't stand it even if I read it a hundred times.

I was halfway through reading it, and then browsed the table of contents at the back, and decided to write a serious review and change the book. First of all, this novel is purely case-based from beginning to end. It combines the theory of live-streaming Lianmai case legal education and offline court defense with practical writing throughout the whole text. The system provides some functions, but other than skills, other things such as money are of no use. It's true that I have worked hard to write so many chapters, but things must be reversed precisely because they are purely case-based and lack the "accidents" and "reversals" used in plots and film and television dramas, and there are even few exciting points. Therefore, it is difficult for this type of novel to gain popularity. Objectively speaking, the author carefully writes various real cases, and also implicitly projects some popular cases in real life, and is extremely rigorous from the perspective of laws and regulations. As an academic extracurricular book, this is a coffee break reference book for legal practitioners. However, as an online article with entertainment as its core, it will not adapt to the local environment.

French is supposed to be rigorous, but you are so inconsistent and there are so many missing words and typos.

I have said one thing three times before falling into the pit. I have said it three times before and after. I don't know if there is more later. There are one or two plots that are almost the same. I mentioned them before, but I will say them again later without changing the ingredients. Some things are too much nonsense to talk about for a long time, and I am speechless. But, this book is still okay, remarkable, and worth reading, but don't read too much. If you think it is not good, don't ask me. I can only say that this work is above average.