Shen Qing, who had just established her own business empire, became the second daughter of the old Shen family.
With her face turned to the earth and her back to the sky, she was exhausted and had no food or clothing. She was all advantaged by the white lotus and her daughter in the first house. The best cousin wanted her to marry that leper bastard!
Shen Qing said that you should not panic when something happens. It is really delicious to step on the best and abuse the scum to make a fortune.
As peach blossoms bloomed on the road, the sinister and domineering prince came to visit.
Shen Qing: "Men will only affect the speed at which I get rich!"
Gu Hanzhang: "But Gao Fushuai won't. Gao Fushuai will only make you one step closer to success!"
Very nice and worth watching. The words are meaningful and rich in content; the character descriptions are lifelike. Almost every theme is fully developed, with twists and turns. The heroine travels through time and has outstanding appearance, noble character, independence and self-reliance, intelligence and hard work. The heroine herself changes the status quo through hard work, setting goals, and doing business. At the same time, a perfect girl attracts countless outstanding men.
Although the article is long, it is overall good. The plot is full and the characters are three-dimensional. It is exciting from beginning to end. Worth reading!
The heroine Shen Qing, the male protagonist Gu Hanzhang, the heroine is a career woman who travels through ancient times to expand her career. She is smart and capable, and has a good personality. She repays kindness and revenge. The heroine's mother, Zhang Xiu'e, is simple, kind and studious, but she is strong as a mother and grows and changes very quickly. However, the villains in the whole book are a bit weak, and the holes behind Luo Changsheng have not been filled. The power of the court has been reduced, but the women are strong and the men are strong, they are evenly matched, and the heroine is not a love mind. The overall plot is not bad.
At first I saw that the rating was too low and I wanted to skip it, but after reading the reviews it was okay. What criteria is this rating based on? It shouldn't be! No space and special skills to be in a league of your own!
This book is very good. I have already read it for the second time. It shouldn't have scored 8.3. The score of 9.6 Is not an exaggeration.
Why do I feel that the heroine's father is so heartless? He doesn't love his wife and children. He has kept his sister-in-law by his side for more than ten years. I can't understand how he wants to repay his kindness. Everything else is fine.
How can such a scumbag be described as a scholar? Farming in the countryside is just fine. Scholars value reputation the most. He actually brought his sister-in-law with him and taught in the academy. I'm really speechless.
In line with my stubborn character of starting from beginning to end, I still finished reading the book. What should I say? Not a good storyteller? But after I finished reading it, I said it was good, but I also felt that the whole book had various problems, so after thinking about it, I gave it a neutral rating.
In addition to a few typos, the sentences are fluent, and there are several logical problems in the whole book (for example, the abandoned wife and daughter and the widowed sister-in-law have lived together in the college for more than ten years. It is impossible for a conservative ancient man to do such a thing and he is qualified to be a role model...), The story plot is straightforward, and the relationship between the good and the villain is There is no profound strategy for either the initiator or the dismantling party (the author's great mental ability is closely related to the depth of the text), but there is nothing here and there. The heroine has been humiliated from the beginning to the end of a thousand chapters. The heroine has insufficient ability to retaliate. She always adheres to the Buddhist attitude towards evil words. She is so angry! Why! But the author has been blindly praising the heroine's ability to break the situation! In ancient times, when imperial power was paramount but fate was trivial, how could the protagonist, who was at the top of the pyramid, tolerate a few treacherous and evil deeds that could not be brought to the fore almost from beginning to end? I like the wise Mrs. Yu, the kind-hearted Nie Qingmei and Zhang Houshan
I didn't understand it at the beginning. Who lost her virginity? The characters are so confusing? Didn't the heroine Shen Qingqing have to go to the academy to find her father? It was she who wrote about losing her virginity. Then when she got married, she said that Shen Lianlian was the one who lost her virginity, and she didn't want to take the blame for others. I was also speechless. Author, do you want to read what you wrote?
I just want to ask, is there really such a father? Aren't you reading books from sages? Why can I live in the same courtyard with my sister-in-law without knowing how to avoid suspicion?
Very nice and worth watching. The words are meaningful and rich in content; the character descriptions are lifelike. Almost every theme is fully developed, with twists and turns. The heroine travels through time and has outstanding appearance, noble character, independence and self-reliance, intelligence and hard work. The heroine herself changes the status quo through hard work, setting goals, and doing business. At the same time, a perfect girl attracts countless outstanding men.
Although the article is long, it is overall good. The plot is full and the characters are three-dimensional. It is exciting from beginning to end. Worth reading!
The heroine Shen Qing, the male protagonist Gu Hanzhang, the heroine is a career woman who travels through ancient times to expand her career. She is smart and capable, and has a good personality. She repays kindness and revenge. The heroine's mother, Zhang Xiu'e, is simple, kind and studious, but she is strong as a mother and grows and changes very quickly. However, the villains in the whole book are a bit weak, and the holes behind Luo Changsheng have not been filled. The power of the court has been reduced, but the women are strong and the men are strong, they are evenly matched, and the heroine is not a love mind. The overall plot is not bad.
At first I saw that the rating was too low and I wanted to skip it, but after reading the reviews it was okay. What criteria is this rating based on? It shouldn't be! No space and special skills to be in a league of your own!
This book is very good. I have already read it for the second time. It shouldn't have scored 8.3. The score of 9.6 Is not an exaggeration.
Why do I feel that the heroine's father is so heartless? He doesn't love his wife and children. He has kept his sister-in-law by his side for more than ten years. I can't understand how he wants to repay his kindness. Everything else is fine.
How can such a scumbag be described as a scholar? Farming in the countryside is just fine. Scholars value reputation the most. He actually brought his sister-in-law with him and taught in the academy. I'm really speechless.
In line with my stubborn character of starting from beginning to end, I still finished reading the book. What should I say? Not a good storyteller? But after I finished reading it, I said it was good, but I also felt that the whole book had various problems, so after thinking about it, I gave it a neutral rating. In addition to a few typos, the sentences are fluent, and there are several logical problems in the whole book (for example, the abandoned wife and daughter and the widowed sister-in-law have lived together in the college for more than ten years. It is impossible for a conservative ancient man to do such a thing and he is qualified to be a role model...), The story plot is straightforward, and the relationship between the good and the villain is There is no profound strategy for either the initiator or the dismantling party (the author's great mental ability is closely related to the depth of the text), but there is nothing here and there. The heroine has been humiliated from the beginning to the end of a thousand chapters. The heroine has insufficient ability to retaliate. She always adheres to the Buddhist attitude towards evil words. She is so angry! Why! But the author has been blindly praising the heroine's ability to break the situation! In ancient times, when imperial power was paramount but fate was trivial, how could the protagonist, who was at the top of the pyramid, tolerate a few treacherous and evil deeds that could not be brought to the fore almost from beginning to end? I like the wise Mrs. Yu, the kind-hearted Nie Qingmei and Zhang Houshan
I didn't understand it at the beginning. Who lost her virginity? The characters are so confusing? Didn't the heroine Shen Qingqing have to go to the academy to find her father? It was she who wrote about losing her virginity. Then when she got married, she said that Shen Lianlian was the one who lost her virginity, and she didn't want to take the blame for others. I was also speechless. Author, do you want to read what you wrote?
I just want to ask, is there really such a father? Aren't you reading books from sages? Why can I live in the same courtyard with my sister-in-law without knowing how to avoid suspicion?