1977: Snow Disaster from the Start, Yet I Feed My Family Like Kings

Laughing out loud under the covers! Nice! Down to earth!

Interlocking, wonderful and wonderful.

In that era, almost all the people who did this were dead, and they could still take commissions openly. The author was at least born in the 1990s.

Nice!

Good

The plot develops quickly and doesn't drag on, which is a good thing. At least the audience can enjoy watching it. At present, what is beginning to appear in the later period is the confusion of the narrative rhythm. An analysis shows that in the early stages of the protagonist's reincarnation, the narrative is biased toward microscopic narratives, with the focus being on details and starting with small things, such as what he did on a certain day, who he dealt with, what difficulties he encountered, what benefits he gained, etc. In the middle period, it starts to cut to the macro level, and the focus will shift to the plot, which is like pressing fast forward. The number of days in the world and the development of the story will be quickly advanced. After having these two concepts, let's go back to the article itself. The reason why the narrative rhythm begins to become confusing is because the article is in the standard subsection form, with a four-paragraph structure of cause, climax and result. The micro description of this article focuses on the process, and there are also a lot of macro and rapid advancements in the other three paragraphs. Rhythm is like intentionality. Only one breath and one breath can ensure a suitable reading experience. Articles written with this structure are like inhaling → exhaling → exhaling → exhaling. The reading experience will become more outgoing and less incoming. After rising and falling, it will continue to sink. The direct result is that the mood of the article will continue to decline and the reader's fatigue will continue to increase. If you want to optimize, you must reasonably allocate the timing of switching between the two writing methods. To give a few examples, arrange the causes through climax and results in order: 1. Detailed and detailed - is a standard article structure. The reading experience is a complete thing. If there are no mistakes or excellence, the level of the article can only be improved by the hard arrangement of the plot. 2. Slightly detailed and slightly detailed - Contrast the opposite article structure and completely opposite reading perception. Choosing to suppress emotions at the node where emotions are called can put more emphasis on negative emotions and can be used to pave the way for plots of suspense and great sadness. 3. Slightly detailed and detailed - lengthening the rhythm of a single emotion to create a stronger visual stimulation is the narrative rhythm of the current mainstream short dramas, and no further explanation is needed. 4. Detailed and slightly detailed - is the third type of contrapuntal structure, which changes from continuous strong stimulation to continuous gentleness. Generally speaking, there are not many novels with this structure, and most of them are used in emotionless explanations of history and textbooks from a third perspective. So in my opinion, this novel cannot be placed in a good or bad position. I can only hope that the author's notes can be improved in the future.

The writing is okay, not too verbose, and the plot moves forward very quickly.

The most fearful thing in a novel is saliva. The storyline advances slowly. For example, after reading chapter 80, you go directly to chapter 85. There is no sense of violation. That means that the contents of chapters 81 to 84 are dispensable. This novel violates this taboo.

Abandon it, abandon it, the more you look at it, the uglier it becomes.

Our Lady Withdraw