Light the Incense and Marry the Snake King

It's very, very beautiful, and I highly recommend it. However, I don't have a monthly vote this month, so I can only vote next month.

Except for the first few articles, some of the words are too detailed and look a bit like nonsense. But after the fifth and sixth articles, I feel that it is quite good to read, but I don't know why so few people read it. I hope the author will get better and better.

I originally wanted to wait until I read the entire story before commenting, but the current content makes me feel the need to write my own opinion. Many authors on Qimao that I think have potential have stopped writing. I have read all the books of the two authors of this article, and I have always thought that he is a good author. I hope to continue writing. I hope that the author's books can have better data, so I would like to provide some reference opinions. First of all, I want to say that the subject matter is interesting. I sincerely hope that people who read my book review will read it and support the author. The biggest problem is first person writing. Writing in the first person is difficult. It puts the protagonist in a position of being judged and scrutinized, reducing the reader's sympathy and understanding for the protagonist. In contrast, third-person writing increases distance and creates a stronger sense of fiction, making readers more tolerant of the protagonist. This is especially fatal in online articles. In fact, many online article editors will directly say that they do not accept the first person. In addition, first-person writing will limit the scope of the narrative, and insufficient writing power will make the story very thin. In successful first-person writing, the protagonist or author often has complex and rich emotions and thoughts, which can support the content of a book. References are made to Nabokov's "Lolita" and Milan Kundera's "The Joke". Among the author's books, several written in the third person are obviously better than those written in the first person. The second problem is that I feel that this book seems to be written as a long story in the same way as a short story. The conflict in the opening chapter is more direct and intense, and the text focuses on the conflict. This writing method is suitable for short stories, because short stories are limited in length and must use the most straightforward plot and text to create a sense of excitement. But the refreshing feeling of straightforwardness comes and goes quickly, and the threshold will be raised if there are too many, so readers will definitely feel more and more bored when writing a long story like this. The advantage of a long novel is that it uses more detailed settings and richer foreshadowing to guide readers into the story and empathize with it. In any case, I will continue to follow up and hope that the author will get better and better!