
The Day I Failed the Exams, I Married a Sweet Young Heiress Worth a Fortune
落榜当天,娶了个首富千金小娇妻
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 500k Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Alternate History
- Updated
- 1y ago
- Source
- Qimao
Stats
All-time: Popularity, Must-read votes.
249Chapters
274kPopularity
1kReaders
851Must-read votes
8.5Score
424Ratings
Tags
Synopsis
More by this author
Readers also read
Daming, Get Xiang Yu Template at the Beginning
Replaced His Brother as Shaoqing of Dali Temple and Shocked Everyone
Steal the Country
Three Kingdoms: Defending the Border for Ten Years, Li Yuanba Was Signed at the Beginning
The Best Prodigal Son
The Most Powerful Crown Prince of Ming Dynasty
Datang: from Nine to Five, Li Er Is Mad at Me!
The Tang Dynasty Started as a Village Chief
The Strongest Luo Chengzhi Swept the World
Summon Li Kui at the Beginning of the Three Kingdoms
Datang: My Wife Is Wu Meiniang
Datang: I Treat You as Brother Li, and You Let Me Marry Li Zhi
Training the Southern Song Dynasty
Da Qin: I Can't Stand It Anymore After Killing Zhao Gao at the Beginning
Start: I Am the King in the Three Kingdoms
After Severing the Relationship, the Prince and His Family Regretted It for the Rest of Their Lives.
The First Craftsman in the Song Dynasty
Scouts of the Tang Dynasty
Three Kingdoms: the Shu Han Was a Prodigal, and Wollongong Was Burned at the Beginning
Traveling Through the Song Dynasty to Regain the Old Mountains and Rivers
Reader comments 9
Google Translate

The author's cultural level is limited, his writing is poor, and his logic is confusing.
The preface I wrote does not match the postscript, why is it such a high score? Sometimes I am a scholar, sometimes I am a good candidate, and my speech is confused and incoherent.
I lost interest in reading when I saw the abacus snapping.
The writing is just average How did you give such a high score? How did you evaluate it?
I like this kind of opening, but there are many typos that affect the viewing. The author's writing style is not very good and needs to be improved. Some sentences are not fluent, so I only read less than ten chapters. There are too many typos!
The preface written by AI does not match the postscript and is confusing! And those who give good reviews don't say how good it looks? Didn't you write a book review on these good-looking ones?
It's too general and the article is inconsistent.
The script is so good
Just relying on the defense, can't you tell the difference between a scholar and an author? Such a high score is all done by brushing it up, those who say it looks good are really just bastards