Don't Mess with Her: The Fake Heiress Is the Real Heiress!

I had a good impression after watching nearly half of it. The sentences are smooth and there are few typos. The plot concept is relatively clean, not dark or sad. There are more provocative women. External conflicts can be resolved at any time without delay. The relationship between the male and female protagonists sometimes creates conflicts artificially. Isn't it wrong to simply explain the problem and it will be gone? Comparatively speaking, it is superior. It makes you feel angry but not heart-wrenching. I don't know about the second half, but it's not as common as the first half.

After reading more than 170 chapters, I feel that everyone is a little sick. The heroine is involved with three men. The heroine's best friend is entangled in bed with the heroine's two uncles. The hero and heroine have been engaged since childhood. After the heroine returns, the hero does not know that the person he is engaged to is the heroine, so he breaks off the engagement unilaterally. After knowing the truth, he starts to pursue the heroine. During this period, there is also a plot of admitting the wrong savior. After the heroine breaks up with the evil partner, she becomes emotional when she gets along with the hero. She didn't blame him at all for breaking off the engagement without permission. Instead, she kept seeing him and she felt happy when the male protagonist gave her a good look. . . I feel like everyone has a bit of a wrong outlook on things.

I really don't like this heroine

Doesn't the heroine have so many vests? He is still the second boss of a handicraft shop, writes novels, and is a famous painter. As for being left penniless by his adoptive parents? The novel was written out of sync and not coherent. At first, the heroine was made to be so poor, but then there were so many waistcoats that came out that she should be very rich. How could she be penniless?