Get Rich Overnight! My Factory Connects Ancient and Modern Times

I didn't pay much attention when I read the introduction. I came in, took a look and then left. Finally, when I checked Mr. Huo's website for the third time, I found that this article was published by the author Da Da. I was instantly fascinated. After a patient look, I found that it was indeed my favorite.

I have always rejected this kind of article about trading multiple employers, because I have always stubbornly believed that it is more interesting to only trade with one. However, I was relieved when I found out that the male protagonist is a modern person in the same time and space as the female protagonist. The content is still good, especially since trading starts from ancient times, things become more and more interesting! Come on, author, please update soon!

Because I read a lot of articles of the same type, I thought they were all similar, so I didn't read the introduction. I accidentally saw in the discussion forum that the male protagonist is actually a modern person. I prefer to read ancient romances and only accept the female protagonist falling in love with an ancient prince. Therefore, I don't like this book! It's true that I didn't read the introduction beforehand, so I still gave it a good review, but in fact this is not my truest idea!

I saw the abandonment of the matriarchal tribe. As a person who has been harmed by son preference, the heroine actually took the initiative to improve the status of men in the matriarchal society? Does she know that she is regarded as a god in that time and space? Did she ever think about the consequences when she said this? It's so disgusting.

The male protagonist has such a venomous mouth. He is sarcastic about the female protagonist all day long. Is the female protagonist so mean? She must be with him. And later on, the emotional scenes between the two become more and more disgusting. Just like the pornographic novel, I really don't want to see it anymore.

I just watched Primitive Tribes. I am a bit of a feminist and even a bit radical feminist. I was a bit surprised when I saw in the comments section what led primitive tribes to favor boys over girls. But the beginning is quite attractive and I watched it. It is completely nonsense! If we just tell primitive tribes that "men are not unprotected by gods", because matriarchal society is not equal, equality is neither favoring boys over girls nor valuing girls over boys. Just like if a person goes back to ancient times and says that it is enough to improve the status of women, but if he goes back to primitive society and says to improve the status of men, why not? Even if it later develops into favoring boys over girls, it is a normal trend of historical development, because it is difficult to achieve a harmonious society. As far as I can see so far, the heroine only stated a fact, and she did not even guide equal rights. If there is any discomfort in the follow-up, I will post a lightning protection. The current writing of this book is really good.

The plot of the story is relatively novel, not the ordinary one that talks about the present and the past, and then there is a deep love between the young general, the prince and the city lord in the future. As an exchange manager across time and space, the heroine has successively traded with special people from feudal society, primitive society and future interstellar space (must be desperate, have outstanding minds, and be the future controllers of time and space). I saw the change part with Starboy abandoned the article. The main reason is that I don't like the character of the heroine. Although she has the advantages of being independent and strong, she is indeed greedy. Goldfinger Exchange comes from the merits accumulated by the family for generations. It is natural to open an exchange to make money, but at least for the so-called military intermediary trading part, it enjoys the protection and support of the country from top to bottom, but there is no feedback to the country. The heroine's surname "Rong" is wrong and she really doesn't deserve it! The professor in the article spends N billion to buy cultural relics, and the major general in his thirties saves one billion New Year's money for his sister who was lost in infancy. Is it Japanese yen?

Looks good! ! It's my type! ! Big cheers for the author! ! I will definitely chase it to the end! ! ! (,,>᎑<,,)

How should I put it? This is the first time I have seen a work with countless bugs, logical loopholes, and unreasonableness. This can no longer be defined as a brainless novel. It is simply a work that rubs the readers and the author's own IQ on the ground. Why do you say this? You will understand by giving two examples. One is a representative who doesn't take the reader's IQ seriously. The book says that the second customer trades wild ginseng. We can roughly infer the gathering place of this primitive tribe, but suddenly the heroine needs Tianshan snow lotus, Polygonum multiflorum, Cordyceps sinensis, etc. This tribe can also get it, which is very confusing. Then there are various ancient trees, medicinal materials and even animals that are only found in different regions. Is this tribe so big that it covers half the world? The author may have been aware of this problem, so he later quoted a so-called expert in the book and said that the ecological environment thousands of years ago was better than it is now, so it is possible to find different animals and plants in the same area. Please, no matter how good the ecological environment is, we cannot ignore the differences in environmental climate caused by different latitudes of the earth. Is this treating readers as illiterate? Well, this can be explained as the author's negligence, and after all, it is a fantasy novel. To borrow the author's words from the book; it can be traded in different time and space, what else can't be accepted? The author set this up so that I can barely continue reading without thinking, but you have to abide by the rules you set. Others disagree. The first step is to set the space-time trading space so that living objects can continue to grow and survive, while dead objects will be stuck in time and remain unchanged (in fact, this setting itself is contradictory enough. How can this happen in the same space, but it doesn't matter. Since the author writes this, let's see it this way). The second step is that the author comes up with a self-denial: the guest enters the space to ask for help, and the heroine thinks, "Anyway, you can stay in time. As long as you don't go out, you won't die. You can slowly find a way to wait for rescue." Oh my God, aren't only dead things ignoring time? Are pregnant women and fetuses dead? If this is true, then the tiger that was brought in had difficulty giving birth, so why is the heroine anxious? With such inconsistent writing, does the author have amnesia or does he find it funny to slap himself? From these two examples, it can be seen that the author does not take the readers' IQ seriously at all, nor does he take his own face seriously. There are countless problems like this in books. If a bug or unreasonableness is regarded as a hole, then this novel is like a sieve, like sifting flour. I endured it again and again, and after reading a third of it, I couldn't stand it anymore (I can read so much because the setting of time and space trading is relatively new). It is highly rated and highly recommended in reviews. It takes a lot of conscience to do it.

If you are worth 100 million, then buy a Wuling car